{"id":11950,"date":"2026-08-14T16:46:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T16:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/14\/yargitay-12-ceza-dairesinin-2023-4629-e-2026-3072-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-08-14T16:46:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-14T16:46:00","slug":"yargitay-12-ceza-dairesinin-2023-4629-e-2026-3072-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/14\/yargitay-12-ceza-dairesinin-2023-4629-e-2026-3072-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 2023\/4629 E., 2026\/3072 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>12. Ceza Dairesi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>2023\/4629 E., 2026\/3072 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130:Ceza Dairesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2022\/1279 E., 2023\/701 K.<br \/>\nSU\u00c7LAR : \u015eantaj, hakaret, verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme<br \/>\nH\u00dcK\u00dcMLER: Mahk\u00fbmiyet<br \/>\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc: Temyiz istemlerinin esastan reddi ile h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 298\/1. maddesindeki temyiz istemlerinin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmekle, i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince hakaret su\u00e7undan kurulan ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 58\/6-7 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca m\u00fckerrirli\u011fine karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ikinci kez m\u00fckerrirlik uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle hakaret su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hakaret su\u00e7una y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin reddine dair ek karar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmedi\u011fi belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda hakaret su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 125\/2-1-4, 53\/1-2-3, 58\/6-7. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ve m\u00fckerirli\u011fe, tehdit su\u00e7undan TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 106\/1-2.c\u00fcmle, 53\/1-2-3, 58\/6-7. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 30 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ve m\u00fckerrirli\u011fe karar verilmi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve kat\u0131lan vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131 \u00fczerine duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 280\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda hakaret su\u00e7undan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 125\/4, 53\/1-2-3, 58\/6-7. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ve ikinci kez m\u00fckerirli\u011fe, \u015fantaj su\u00e7undan, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 107\/2-1, 52\/2, 53\/1-2-3, 58\/6-7. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l hapis ve 100,00 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ve ikinci kez m\u00fckerirli\u011fe, verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7undan TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 136\/1, 53\/1-2-3, 58\/6-7. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 2 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunluklar\u0131na ve ikinci kez m\u00fckerirli\u011fe karar verilmi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz istemlerinin esastan reddi ile h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren Tebli\u011fname ile dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye tevdi edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong><br \/>\nB\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz sebepleri; \u015fantaj su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, eylemin basit tehdit su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funa, hakaret ve verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unun birlikte i\u015flenmesi nedeniyle fikri i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca hakaret su\u00e7undan ayr\u0131ca ceza verilmemesi gerekti\u011fine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz sebepleri; at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemedi\u011fine, sab\u0131ka kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle savunmas\u0131na itibar edilmedi\u011fine, kat\u0131lan\u0131n da kendisine hakaret etti\u011fine, kat\u0131lan\u0131n da cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine, olaylar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, dosyada mevcut belge ve bilgiler, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde al\u0131nan beyanlarla birlikte dikkate al\u0131narak yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede; bir d\u00f6nem evinde yard\u0131mc\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kat\u0131lan\u0131n evinden h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olduktan sonra, kat\u0131lan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce Facebook \u00fczerinden yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi,&#8230;&#8230;adl\u0131 Facebook hesab\u0131ndan &#8220;bu kad\u0131n\u0131 yayal\u0131m bu kad\u0131n evlere temizli\u011fe diye gidip h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yap\u0131yor benim can\u0131m yand\u0131 sizlerin yanmas\u0131n&#8221; \u015feklindeki ifadeler ile payla\u015f\u0131p, &#8220;ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 getir yoksa seni rezil ederim, o i\u015fe gitti\u011fin yerlere boy boy foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131 asar\u0131m, s\u00fcr\u00fcm s\u00fcr\u00fcm s\u00fcr\u00fcneceksin, utanmaz&#8221; \u015feklinde mesaj atan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 1 25&#8230; \/1-2. c\u00fcmlesindeki hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lana ait ki\u015fisel veri kapsam\u0131ndaki resmini kat\u0131lan\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile payla\u015fmas\u0131 eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 136\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unu ve ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;nun 125\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakaret su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, &#8220;ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 getir yoksa seni rezil ederim, o i\u015fe gitti\u011fin yerlere boy boy foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131 asar\u0131m&#8221; \u015feklindeki mesaj i\u00e7eri\u011finin de TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 107\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u015fantaj su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilerek ve \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda hakaret, verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme ve \u015fantaj su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adli sicil kayd\u0131nda yer alan mahk\u00fbmiyeti ile ikinci kez m\u00fckerrer oldu\u011fu belirlenerek san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ikinci kez m\u00fckerrirlik uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. GEREK\u00c7E VE KARAR<\/strong><br \/>\nA. Verileri Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Olarak Verme Veya Ele Ge\u00e7irme ve \u015eantaj Su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Kurulan H\u00fck\u00fcmlere Y\u00f6nelik B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Temyiz \u0130stemleri Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<br \/>\nYarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin us\u00fbl ve kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemlerin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemlere uyan su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla,&#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Ceza Dairesinin karar\u0131nda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen temyiz sebepleri ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 289\/1. maddesi ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucunda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 302\/1. maddesi gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fname\u2019ye uygun olarak, oy birli\u011fiyle TEMY\u0130Z \u0130STEMLER\u0130N\u0130N ESASTAN REDD\u0130 \u0130LE H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130N ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>B. Hakaret Su\u00e7undan Kurulan H\u00fckme Y\u00f6nelik B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n Temyiz \u0130stemi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<br \/>\nYarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin us\u00fbl ve kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu kapsamdaki temyiz sebeplerinin reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce Facebook \u00fczerinden yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi,&#8230;&#8230;adl\u0131 Facebook hesab\u0131ndan &#8220;bu kad\u0131n\u0131 yayal\u0131m bu kad\u0131n evlere temizli\u011fe diye gidip h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yap\u0131yor benim can\u0131m yand\u0131 sizlerin yanmas\u0131n&#8221; \u015feklindeki ifadeler ile payla\u015fmas\u0131 \u015feklinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce internet \u00fczerinden payla\u015fmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ki\u015fisel veri kapsam\u0131nda olan resmini kat\u0131lan\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hukuka uygunluk nedenlerinin bulunmamas\u0131 sebebiyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak payla\u015fmas\u0131 sebebiyle 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 136\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7unun ve kat\u0131lan\u0131n h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia edilmesinden dolay\u0131 kat\u0131lan\u0131n onur \u015feref ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n rencide edilmesi nedeniyle de ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 125\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen hakaret su\u00e7unun olu\u015ftu\u011fu, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 44\/1. maddesindeki fikri i\u00e7tima h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca bir fiil ile birden fazla su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda daha a\u011f\u0131r ceza gerektiren verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 ile yetinilmesi ve hakaret su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken, verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hakaret su\u00e7undan yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde ayr\u0131ca mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz istemi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden&#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Ceza Dairesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fname\u2019ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, oy birli\u011fiyle BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 304\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bozma il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re&#8230; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>30.03.2026 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-source py-3 small \">\n    <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesi 2023\/4629 E., 2026\/3072 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130:Ceza Dairesi SAYISI : 2022\/1279 E., 2023\/701 K. SU\u00c7LAR : \u015eantaj, hakaret, verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak verme veya ele ge\u00e7irme H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER: Mahk\u00fbmiyet TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc: Temyiz istemlerinin esastan reddi ile h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin onanmas\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11950\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}