{"id":11938,"date":"2026-08-12T15:16:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-12T15:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/12\/aymnin-2023-24029-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-08-12T15:16:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T15:16:00","slug":"aymnin-2023-24029-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/12\/aymnin-2023-24029-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2023\/24029 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

<\/strong>ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>H.<\/strong> E. <\/strong>BA\u015eVURUSU <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/24029)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Karar Tarihi: 17\/6\/2026<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00dcyeler<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Yunus Emre BA\u011eLAR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ba\u015fvurucu<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Vekili<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Av. Hasan Ali TAN<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n; su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuldu\u011fu muhakeme s\u00fcreci itibar\u0131yla ise ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuruda ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. Bal\u0131kesir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu emniyette m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde; FET\u00d6\/PDY ile ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

3. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen beyanlar \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

– K.S.nin emniyette m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde; 2012 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar g\u00fclen cemaati olarak bilinen cemaatin sadece din\u00ee duygular ile sohbetlerine zaman zaman i\u015ftirak etti\u011fini, bu yap\u0131yla 2003-2004 y\u0131llar\u0131nda Bal\u0131kesir\u2019e tayin olduktan sonra davet \u00fczerine sohbetlerine giderek tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zaman zaman bu sohbetlere hi\u00e7 gitmedi\u011finin de oldu\u011funu, hatta 2008-2010 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131 hi\u00e7 gitmedi\u011fini, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ise tamamen koptu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucu ile Polis Okulunda birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, zaman zaman sohbet ortamlar\u0131nda birlikte oldu\u011funu, bu yap\u0131yla 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda irtibat\u0131n\u0131 kesti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

– B.\u015e.nin emniyette m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde; ba\u015fvurucunun 2011 ile 2013 Haziran ay\u0131 aras\u0131nda sohbet grup sorumlusu olan \u015fah\u0131slar aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu gruba m\u00fctevelli heyeti denildi\u011fini, K.S.ye ba\u011fl\u0131 sorumlu sohbet gruplar\u0131 olarak haftada bir veya 15 g\u00fcnde bir gruptan bir sorumlunun veya K.S. isimli \u015fahs\u0131n evinde topland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu toplant\u0131larda sohbet gruplar\u0131n\u0131n sorunlar\u0131, sohbetlere kat\u0131l\u0131m durumu, gelmeyenlerin gelmeme sebepleri ve benzeri konular\u0131n konu\u015fuldu\u011funu, m\u00fctevelli toplant\u0131lar\u0131nda K.S. isimli \u015fahs\u0131n elinde bulunan Bal\u0131kesir Asayi\u015f \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc b\u00fcnyesindeki g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n liste \u00fczerinden teker teker g\u00fcndeme al\u0131narak ilgilenileceklerin belirlenip daha sonra K.S. isimli \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fctevelli grubundan her bir ki\u015fiye ilgilenmesi ve cemaate kazand\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir hedef polis memuru belirledi\u011fini, yine bu toplant\u0131larda sohbet gruplar\u0131n\u0131n telefon konusunda tedbirli davranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin s\u00fcrekli vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu m\u00fctevelli toplant\u0131lar\u0131nda sohbet sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n her ay\u0131n 15’inde kendi gruplar\u0131nda toplanan himmet paralar\u0131n\u0131 K.S. isimli polis memuruna teslim ettiklerini, 17-25 Aral\u0131k olaylar\u0131ndan sonra bu olu\u015fumdan kendini soyutlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131 tamamen kopard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, o g\u00fcnden itibaren bu yap\u0131lanman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir faaliyetine kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisiyle irtibat kurmak isteyen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 da tavr\u0131n\u0131 koyarak reddetti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Savc\u0131l\u0131kta m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde de konuyla ilgili olarak emniyette verdi\u011fi ifade i\u00e7eri\u011fini aynen kabul ve tekrar etti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

– A.K.nin emniyette m\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmadan bilgi sahibi s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde; 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyla beraber B. ve H.Y. isimli \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n evine geldi\u011fini, B.nin Fetullah G\u00fclen cemaatine ba\u011fl\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek kendisini sohbetlere davet etti\u011fini, B., ba\u015fvurucu ve B.S.nin himmet olay\u0131n\u0131 organize etti\u011fini, bu durumun 2013 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar devam etti\u011fini, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki dershanelerin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinden sonra siyasi konular\u0131n konu\u015fulmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 17-25 Aral\u0131k olaylar\u0131ndan sonra sohbetlere kat\u0131lmay\u0131 b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu tarihten sonra gruptakilerin kendi aralar\u0131nda toplanmaya devam edip etmediklerini bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

– M.A.n\u0131n savc\u0131l\u0131kta m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde; kendisinin Bal\u0131kesir ilinde g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde Bal\u0131kesir ilinde erkek yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer alan, sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131lan, himmet veren polisler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011funu, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla bu yap\u0131yla ili\u015fi\u011fini kesti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 24\/10\/2016 tarihli iddianameyi d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede; ba\u015fvurucunun sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, himmet verdi\u011fi, m\u00fctevelli heyeti denen sohbet grubu sorumlulu\u011fu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctle iltisakl\u0131 okulda e\u011fitim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne bulundurularak \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

5. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fcyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Bal\u0131kesir \u0130kinci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama toplamda 45 celse s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc celsede al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda; \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn herhangi bir toplant\u0131, sohbet veya etkinli\u011fine kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctle bir ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dosyan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 K.S., d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc celsede al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. Dosyan\u0131n di\u011fer bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131 B.\u015e.; ikinci celsede al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun sohbet grup sorumlusu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun 2011 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ortalar\u0131nda polis okuluna gitti\u011fini, ondan sonra ne oldu\u011funu, ne yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

7. Dosyan\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 M.A. sekizinci celsede al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda; ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6ncesinde asayi\u015fte oldu\u011funu, daha sonra polis okulunda beraber \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun sohbetlere kat\u0131lan ve parasal yard\u0131mda bulunan ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde Bal\u0131kesir erkek yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer alan polisler aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra kimlerin sohbet toplant\u0131s\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda herhangi bir bilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

8. A.K. istinabeyle al\u0131nan ifadesinde; gezi olaylar\u0131 olduktan sonra sohbetlere bir daha gitmedi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucuyla 2013 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar birlikte bulundu\u011funu, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda 17-25 Aral\u0131k olay\u0131ndan sonra bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak kabul edilmesinden sonra bu ki\u015filerle kavgal\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 17-25 Aral\u0131k olay\u0131ndan sonra bu ki\u015filer ile irtibat\u0131n\u0131 kopard\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in daha sonra ne yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

9. Mahkeme ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

\u201c\u2026Gizli Tan\u0131k Garson’dan elde edilen verilerde san\u0131\u011fa ait bilgilerin de oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle s\u00f6z konusu kodlamalar incelendi\u011finde; <\/i><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n <\/i>[ba\u015fvurucu] hakk\u0131nda “SAY” olarak kodlama bulundu\u011fu, bu kodlaman\u0131n “FET\u00d6 mensubiyeti olan, sadakati ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst derecede olan ki\u015fileri” ifade etti\u011fi, kurs taksidi olarak yaz\u0131lan ancak \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde verilen himmeti belirten miktar\u0131n “150” oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/i><\/p>\n

San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beyan ve te\u015fhiste bulunanlar dinlenmi\u015f; <\/i><\/p>\n

–<\/i>[B.\u015e.] a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn Emniyet mahrem yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen sohbetlerin sohbet sorumlusu oldu\u011funu, bu kapsamda d\u00fczenlenen toplant\u0131larda sohbet gruplar\u0131n\u0131n sorunlar\u0131, sohbetlere kat\u0131l\u0131m durumu, gelmeyenlerin gelmeme sebepleri ve benzeri konular\u0131n konu\u015fuldu\u011funu, bu nedenle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bunu takip eden ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu, <\/i><\/p>\n

–<\/i>[M.A.], <\/i>[K.S.] ve tan\u0131k <\/i>[A.K.] a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131nda kendisinin polis memuru olarak Bal\u0131kesir ilinde g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u0131llarda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen sohbetlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan etmi\u015ftir. <\/i><\/p>\n

Tan\u0131klar\u0131n a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131na san\u0131k ile aralar\u0131nda bir husumet bulunmamas\u0131, a\u015famalarda ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 beyanlarda bulunmalar\u0131 ve mahkememizin kabul\u00fc ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmesi nedeniyle itibar edilmi\u015ftir. <\/i><\/p>\n

Gizli Tan\u0131k Garson’dan elde edilen verilerdeki san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki kodlamalar, itibar edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n dijital verideki kodlamalar ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu itibarla san\u0131k hakk\u0131ndaki dijital verideki bu kodlaman\u0131n somut bir \u015fekilde ispatland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, bu verideki kodlamalara da itibar edilmi\u015f ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn Emniyet Mahrem Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde Lise olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan yap\u0131lanmada polis memuru kimli\u011fine ra\u011fmen yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu hiyerar\u015fide “FET\u00d6 mensubiyeti olan, sadakati ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst derecede olan ki\u015fileri” ifade eder \u015fekilde \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn mahrem imamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kodland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde sohbetlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve himmet verdi\u011fi, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde sohbet sorumlusu olarak kimlerin sohbetlere gidip gitmedi\u011fi, sohbet i\u00e7erisinde ya\u015fanan sorunlar\u0131 m\u00fctevelli ad\u0131 verilen di\u011fer sohbet sorumlular\u0131yla kendilerinin ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ki\u015finin liderli\u011fi alt\u0131nda periyodik olarak g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri Mahkememizce sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. <\/i><\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da bahsedilen ve Mahkememizce san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen t\u00fcm bu eylemler san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eylem ve faaliyetlerinin zamansal olarak s\u00fcreklilik, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik ve belirgin bir yo\u011funlu\u011fa ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011fu hususu yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile kesinle\u015fen FET\u00d6\/PDY Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn hiyerar\u015fisi i\u00e7erisinde d\u0131\u015f d\u00fcnyaya kapal\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn gizlilik, disiplin ve mutlak sadakat gibi kurallara uygun davran\u0131\u015flar sergiledi\u011fi, ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesine nedensel ba\u011f ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct ile aras\u0131nda organik ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet olarak kabul edilmi\u015f olmakla bu eylemler TCK m.314\/2’de tan\u0131mlamas\u0131 yap\u0131lan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7una v\u00fccut verdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r…”<\/i><\/p>\n

10. Ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafii karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Dilek\u00e7esinde; FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye kat\u0131lma iradesinin Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini, mevcut delillerle hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011finden ceza verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, temin edilen kodlama verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin 17-25 Aral\u0131k 2013 tarihinden \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, bu eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet olarak kabul edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini, hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

11. Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi (\u0130stinaf Dairesi) 21\/1\/2022 tarihinde istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine temyiz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

12. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130stinaf Dairesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Dilek\u00e7esinde; tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin 17-25 Aral\u0131k 2013 tarihinden \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, bu eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet olarak kabul edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini, hakk\u0131ndaki kodlama verilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, cezaland\u0131rmaya yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

13. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi 5\/12\/2022 tarihinde mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

14. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 2\/3\/2023 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f ve 28\/3\/2023 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

15. Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/strong><\/p>\n

A. Gerek\u00e7eli Karar Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/strong><\/p>\n

16. Ba\u015fvurucu; mevcut delillerle hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011finden ceza verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin 17-25 Aral\u0131k 2013 tarihi \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, bu eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet olarak kabul edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini, FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye kat\u0131lma iradesinin Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

17. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvuru formundaki itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

18. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

19. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

20. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, ki\u015filerin hakkaniyete uygun bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamay\u0131 ve bu amaca uygunluk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n denetlenmesini ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n, davan\u0131n temel maddi ve hukuki sorunlar\u0131 ile taraflarca ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve davan\u0131n sonucunu etkileyen iddia ve itirazlar hakk\u0131nda delillerle ba\u011f kurulmak suretiyle yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermesi zorunludur. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki ve maddi sorunlar\u0131yla ilgisiz de\u011ferlendirmelere kararda yer verilmesi de gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. Karar gerek\u00e7esinin belirtilen unsurlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerine uygun \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011finin taraflarca \u00f6\u011frenilmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ayr\u0131ca demokratik bir toplumda kendi adlar\u0131na verilen yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n sebeplerini toplumun \u00f6\u011frenmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de gereklidir (baz\u0131 eklemeler ve farkl\u0131l\u0131klarla birlikte bkz. Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31, 34).<\/p>\n

21. Di\u011fer taraftan kanun yolu incelemesi yapan mercinin yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemeyle ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015fmas\u0131 ve bunu ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyi kullanarak veya ayn\u0131 at\u0131fla karar\u0131na yans\u0131tmas\u0131, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Bununla birlikte ilk derece mahkemesince kar\u015f\u0131lanmayan veya ancak ilk defa kanun yolu merciine ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n kanun yolu merciince de de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline yol a\u00e7abilir (baz\u0131 eklemeler ve farkl\u0131l\u0131klarla birlikte bkz. Mehmet Yavuz<\/i> [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/2995, 20\/2\/2014, \u00a7 51).<\/p>\n

22. Somut olayda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun sohbet grup sorumlusu oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik B.\u015e. isimli ki\u015finin beyan\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen sohbetlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik M.A., K.S. ve tan\u0131k A.K.nin beyanlar\u0131na ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda “SAY” olarak kodlama bulundu\u011funa, bu kodlaman\u0131n “FET\u00d6 mensubiyeti olan, sadakati ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst derecede olan ki\u015fileri” ifade etti\u011fine, kurs taksidi olarak yaz\u0131lan ancak \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde verilen himmeti belirten miktar\u0131n “150” oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin gizli tan\u0131k garsondan elde edilen verilere dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer yandan tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n dijital verideki kodlamalar ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 9). Ba\u015fvurucu ise mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin 17-25 Aral\u0131k 2013 tarihinden \u00f6ncesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, bu eylemlerin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet olarak kabul edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n

23. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda beyanda bulunan B.\u015e., ba\u015fvurucunun 2011’in ortalar\u0131nda polis okuluna gitti\u011fini, ondan sonra ne oldu\u011funu, ne yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 6). K.S. de \u00f6rg\u00fctle 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda irtibat\u0131n\u0131 kesti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3). M.A. 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra kimlerin sohbet toplant\u0131s\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda herhangi bir bilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 7). A.K. ise 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 17-25 Aral\u0131k olay\u0131ndan sonra bu ki\u015filer ile irtibat\u0131n\u0131 kopard\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in daha sonra ne yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 8).<\/p>\n

24. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde, ki\u015finin \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki faaliyetlerinin zamansal olarak s\u00fcreklilik g\u00f6stermesi, esasa etki edebilecek nitelikte \u00f6nemli bir unsurdur. Bu nedenle Mahkemenin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden yarg\u0131lanan ki\u015filerin \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki faaliyetlerinin zamansal olarak s\u00fcreklilik arz etti\u011fini dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki delillerle ba\u011f kurmak suretiyle gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmesi beklenir.<\/p>\n

25. Anayasa Mahkemesi Mehmet Emin Okyay<\/i> ([GK], B. No: 2023\/47320, 2\/4\/2026) karar\u0131nda; veri inceleme raporlar\u0131nda yer alan gizli tan\u0131k GARSON’dan elde edilen kodlama bilgisini destekleyici\/teyit edici bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde, idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar\u0131n veri analiz raporlar\u0131n\u0131n ehemmiyetini de g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne alarak s\u00f6z konusu kodlama bilgilerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 iltisak ve irtibata y\u00f6nelik \u015f\u00fcpheden hareketle yeterli d\u00fczeyde ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmas\u0131n\u0131n ve ilgili ki\u015filerin iltisak ve irtibat\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan hususlarda kar\u015f\u0131 beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 da almak suretiyle FET\u00d6\/PDY ile iltisak ve irtibat\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sonuca varmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. Mehmet Emin Okyay<\/i>, \u00a7 141).<\/p>\n

26. Yarg\u0131tay gizli tan\u0131k GARSON’dan elde edilen verilere ili\u015fkin inceleme raporunda ki\u015finin “SAY” olarak kodland\u0131\u011f\u0131 baz\u0131 durumlarda, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kamuoyunca da bilinen operasyonel eylemlerinden sonraki tarihlerde \u00f6rg\u00fctsel nitelikteki eylem ve faaliyetlerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeni g\u00fcncel verilere ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, raporda z\u00fcmre ba\u015fkan\u0131<\/i> ve \u00f6\u011fretmen<\/i> olarak belirlenen ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir soru\u015fturma ya da kovu\u015fturma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015filerin tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131larak san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemli g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr [bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesinin 27\/5\/2025 tarihli ve E.2025\/1797, K.15899; 14\/4\/2025 tarihli ve E.2022\/19613, K.2025\/10995; 18\/2\/2025 tarihli ve E.2024\/3263, K.2025\/4597; 9\/10\/2024 tarihli ve E.2022\/12195, K.2024\/11681; 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve E.2022\/15622, K.2024\/11169; 10\/6\/2024 tarihli ve E.2022\/3202, K.2024\/7762; 27\/11\/2023 tarihli ve E.2022\/36229, K.2023\/9443].<\/p>\n

27. Yine Yarg\u0131tay ki\u015finin, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnen y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fcn ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131ndan sonra g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 varsa farkl\u0131 illerde emniyet mensuplar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturmalar ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak veri inceleme raporunda belirtildi\u011fi gibi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerine devam edip etmedi\u011finin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 da \u00f6nemli g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr [bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesinin 20\/5\/2025 tarihli ve E.2024\/11306, K.2025\/14808; 24\/10\/2024 tarihli ve E.2022\/6707, K.2024\/12416; 29\/4\/2024 tarihli ve E.2022\/30786, K.2024\/5908; 12\/3\/2024 tarihli ve E.2023\/1856, K.2024\/4823].<\/p>\n

28. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kamuoyunda bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi tarihten sonras\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bir eylemden bahsetmedikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki kabul k\u0131sm\u0131nda kodlama verileri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeni g\u00fcncel verilere ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kamuoyunca da bilinen operasyonel eylemlerinden sonraki tarihlerde \u00f6rg\u00fctsel nitelikteki eylem ve faaliyetlerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir de\u011ferlendirme yer almamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

29. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131 destekleyebilecek mahiyette itirazlar sunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Mahkemece bu durum gerek\u00e7eli kararda ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131na cevap verilmemi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yarg\u0131lamaya bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda -somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131nda- Mahkemenin davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili hususlar hakk\u0131nda yeterli bir yan\u0131t vermedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

30. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

31. Ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden, kararda var\u0131lan sonuca ve uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen giderime g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun di\u011fer \u015fik\u00e2yetleri hakk\u0131nda kabul edilebilirlik ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

B. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/strong><\/p>\n

32. Ba\u015fvurucunun; su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuldu\u011fu muhakeme s\u00fcreci itibar\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Mehmet Emin K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7<\/i> ([2. B.], B. No: 2013\/5267, 7\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 19-32) ve Mehmet \u015eim\u015fek<\/i> ([1. B.], B. No: 2018\/10953, 22\/7\/2020) kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 <\/i>nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/strong><\/p>\n

33. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

34. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerinin yapmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2)<\/i> [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3)<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n

35. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n

36. U\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi maddi zararla ilgili bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin, ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131<\/i> nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

C. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

\u00c7. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n

D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Bal\u0131kesir 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2016\/261, K.2021\/213) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

F. 1.480,40 TL har\u00e7 ve 40.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 41.480,40 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

G. \u00d6demenin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

\u011e. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/6\/2026 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H. E. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/24029) Karar Tarihi: 17\/6\/2026 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR \u200b Ba\u015fkan : \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yunus Emre BA\u011eLAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Hasan Ali TAN \u200b I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, karar…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11939,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11938\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11939"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}