{"id":11932,"date":"2026-08-12T15:23:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-12T15:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/12\/aymnin-2022-103543-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-08-12T15:23:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T15:23:00","slug":"aymnin-2022-103543-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/12\/aymnin-2022-103543-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2022\/103543 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

<\/strong>ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>H.<\/strong>C.<\/strong> BA\u015eVURUSU <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/103543)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Karar Tarihi: 17\/6\/2026<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

\u00dcyeler<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Hikmet Murat AKKAYA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ba\u015fvurucu<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Vekili<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanunun su\u00e7 saymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiillerden dolay\u0131 silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. 1991 do\u011fumlu ba\u015fvurucu, 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda Hitit \u00dcniversitesi Makine M\u00fchendisli\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00fcniversite e\u011fitimine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, an\u0131lan \u00dcniversiteden 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda mezun oldu\u011funu ve mezuniyet sonras\u0131nda 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinde m\u00fchendis olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 17\/11\/2016 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma sonucunda \u00c7orum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 3\/8\/2017 tarihli iddianamesinin kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

4. \u0130ddianamede; ba\u015fvurucunun b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc, \u00fcniversiteci, ev imam\u0131 olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fctle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 bir derne\u011fe \u00fcye olmas\u0131na, haklar\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi veya y\u00f6neticili\u011fi su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen \u015f\u00fcphelilerle tespit edilen irtibat\u0131na, Samanyolu TV ve Zaman gazetesine y\u00f6nelik i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 \u00c7orum Adliyesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na farkl\u0131 g\u00fcnlerde kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na da yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucunun FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131na uyarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7 ve hedefleri do\u011frultusunda eylem ve faaliyetlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 faaliyet ve etkinliklerle ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. Mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne ifadesi esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klardan A.B.nin beyan\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“<\/i>Ben 2008-2015 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u0130T\u00dc’de i\u015fletme b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde okudum, H.C. da bizim \u00fcniversitemizde \u00f6\u011frenciydi, ben o d\u00f6nem cemaat olarak bilinen yap\u0131n\u0131n evlerinde 2008-2015 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00fcniversite hayat\u0131m boyunca kald\u0131m, san\u0131k ile ayn\u0131 evde kalm\u0131yordum, ben de evlerde abilik yapt\u0131m, konumumuz gere\u011fi san\u0131k ile ayn\u0131 sohbet ortam\u0131nda bulunduk, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6revi de evlerde abilik yapmak, sohbet d\u00fczenlemekti, biz kendimiz topland\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda Fetullah G\u00fclen’in CD’sini izler, kitab\u0131n\u0131 okurduk, bu \u015fekilde sohbet d\u00fczenlerdik, sohbetlerde risale de okunurdu, bu sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131 haftada bir g\u00fcn \u015feklinde olurdu, ben ve san\u0131k cemaat i\u00e7inde abi konumundayd\u0131k, abinin g\u00f6revi evde sorumluluk almak, sohbet d\u00fczenlemek, evin idaresini sa\u011flamakt\u0131, sohbetlerde himmet paras\u0131 topland\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u015fahit olmad\u0131m, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da bu \u015fekilde bir eylemine \u015fahit olmad\u0131m, 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda okul bittikten sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedim, H. C. daha \u00f6nce vermi\u015f oldu\u011fum ifademde anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131m gibi Subayl\u0131k s\u0131navlar\u0131na haz\u0131rland\u0131 ve Deniz Kuvvetlerinde Te\u011fmen oldu, s\u0131nav\u0131 kazan\u0131rken cemaatin bir katk\u0131s\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmiyorum, kendisine soru verilip verilmedi\u011fi konusunda bilgim yoktur, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda net bir bilgim yoktur, sadece abilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 biliyorum, ancak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n abi mi yoksa b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc oldu\u011fu konusu \u015fu an tam olarak hat\u0131rlayam\u0131yorum, her iki g\u00f6revi de yapm\u0131\u015f olabilir, bilgim g\u00f6rg\u00fcm bundan ibarettir, tan\u0131kl\u0131k \u00fccret talebim yoktur dedi.<\/i>“<\/i><\/p>\n

6. H\u00fckme ifadesi esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131k F.Z.nin beyan\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n

“Ben \u0130T\u00dc’de 2010-2014 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda siyaset bilimi ve kamu y\u00f6netimi b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde okudum, san\u0131k ile bu sebeple tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131k, san\u0131k da \u0130T\u00dc’de m\u00fchendislik b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6\u011frenciydi, H. C. cemaat i\u00e7inde b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc olarak ifade edilen g\u00f6revdeydi, bu g\u00f6revdeki ki\u015fi b\u00f6lgesindeki talebelerle ilgilenmek olur, her b\u00f6lgede 4-5 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrsek bu evlerde de 4-5 ki\u015finin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrsek, ortalama 20-25 ki\u015fi civar\u0131nda \u00f6\u011frenciden sorumlu olmas\u0131 gerekir, ben bu d\u00f6nemde H.C.a ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ev abili\u011fi g\u00f6revi yap\u0131yordum, ben evde bulunan 4 ki\u015fiden sorumluydum, H. C.’\u0131 en son 2016 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n \u015eubat ay\u0131nda g\u00f6rd\u00fcm, bu tarihte cemaat i\u00e7indeki g\u00f6revine devam etti\u011fini biliyorum, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonradan Subay oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgim yoktur, bilgim g\u00f6rg\u00fcm bundan ibarettir…<\/i>” <\/i><\/p>\n

7. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ifadesi esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131k Y.B.nin beyan\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Ben 2007 y\u0131l\u0131 ile 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00c7orum’da bulunan Hitit \u00dcniversitesi Kimya M\u00fchendisli\u011fi b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6rd\u00fcm. Okulu 6 y\u0131lda bitirdim ancak 2 y\u0131lda y\u00fcksek lisans yapt\u0131m. 8 sene boyunca okulum sebebiyle \u00c7orum ilinde ikamet ettim. Ben bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda o zaman cemaat olarak bilenen FET\u00d6 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile iltisakl\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenci evinde kald\u0131m. Her \u00f6\u011frenci evinin kendi sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131 olurdu. \u00d6\u011frencilerin sohbeti s\u0131nav durumuna g\u00f6re 2 haftada bir veya ayda bir yap\u0131l\u0131rd\u0131. Sohbetlerde biz \u00f6\u011frenci oldu\u011fumuz i\u00e7in himmet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para istenmezdi. Biz sadece evin ia\u015fesine belli oranda ayl\u0131k para verirdik. San\u0131kla \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn d\u00fczenledi\u011fi toplant\u0131lara kat\u0131l\u0131rd\u0131k. Kendisi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn \u00c7orum k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc idi. K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck talebe mesul\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6revi 7-8 \u00f6\u011frenci evinin organizasyonunu sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Bundan kast\u0131m \u00f6\u011frenci evlerinin ia\u015fesini sa\u011flamak, \u00f6\u011frencilerin eve ka\u00e7ta gidip geldi\u011fini, sohbetlere akt\u0131l\u0131p kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 o evin abisinden \u00f6\u011frenip denetlemektir. K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015fler ile ilgili bir \u00fcst\u00fc olan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck b\u00f6lge imam\u0131na bilgi verir. San\u0131kta benim gibi \u00c7orum’da \u00f6\u011frenci idi. Biraz \u00f6nce belirtti\u011fim gibi \u00f6\u011frenciler evin ia\u015fesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ekstra himmet ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para vermez. San\u0131k yanl\u0131\u015f hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorsam \u00fcniversiteyi bitirildikten sonra \u00c7orum’dan ayr\u0131ld\u0131 ondan sonra kendisi ile bir bilgi sahibi de\u011filim,…<\/i>“<\/p>\n

8. \u00c7orum 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) mahk\u00fbmiyet gerek\u00e7esinde; eylemler de\u011ferlendirilirken t\u00fcm faaliyetlerin tek tek ve ayr\u0131ca bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekti\u011fini, bazen tek bir eylemin \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi i\u00e7in yeterli oldu\u011funu, legal gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcp i\u015fin i\u00e7inde illegal bir\u00e7ok faaliyetin olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ise bu eylemlerin ayr\u0131ca bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak da ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun hukuki durumunun belirlenmesi gerekece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda;<\/p>\n

i. FET\u00d6\/PDY ile irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in kapat\u0131lan Ufuk Akademi Derne\u011fine \u00fcye oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n

ii. Tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun FET\u00d6\/PDY i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc oldu\u011fu ve sorumlu d\u00fczeyde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespit edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

iii. 14\/12\/2014 tarihinde \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye m\u00fczahir bas\u0131n yay\u0131n kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netici ve yazarlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 protesto amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fcte m\u00fczahir sivil toplum kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u00fclke genelinde adliye binalar\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde protesto eylemleri yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 sonras\u0131nda 15\/12\/2014, 16\/12\/2014, 17\/12\/2014, 19\/12\/2014, 23\/12\/2014 ve 24\/12\/2014 tarihlerinde adliye saray\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve oturma eylemine kat\u0131larak destek verdi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

iv. HTS analiz raporuna g\u00f6re di\u011fer \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131 ile irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

9. Sonu\u00e7 olarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri mensubu olmas\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve takdir\u00ee indirim uygulanarak silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan neticeten 6 y\u0131l 6 ay 22 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

10. H\u00fck\u00fcm, istinaf ve temyiz kanun yolu denetiminden ge\u00e7erek 11\/10\/2022 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

11. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 25\/11\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 29\/11\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

12. Komisyon; adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/strong><\/p>\n

13. Ba\u015fvurucu; Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesine at\u0131f yaparak kanunun su\u00e7 ve cezay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tarif etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu ba\u011flamda kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu, Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n kararlar\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin kendine has yap\u0131s\u0131ndan bahsedildi\u011fini ve bu karma\u015f\u0131k yap\u0131n\u0131n kendisini din\u00ee ve hukuki me\u015fruiyet maskesine dayand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7esiyle birlikte kanunsuz su\u00e7 ve ceza olmaz ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Adnan \u015een<\/i> ([GK], B. No: 2018\/8903, 15\/4\/2021) karar\u0131ndaki ilkeler hat\u0131rlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 cevab\u0131nda iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

14. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

”Kimse, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanunun su\u00e7 saymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir fiilden dolay\u0131 cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamaz; kimseye su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi zaman kanunda o su\u00e7 i\u00e7in konulmu\u015f olan cezadan daha a\u011f\u0131r bir ceza verilemez.<\/i>”<\/p>\n

15. Ba\u015fvuru, su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n \u201c<\/i>Su\u00e7 ve cezalara ili\u015fkin esaslar<\/i>\u201d <\/i>ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 38. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi uyar\u0131nca hangi fiillerin yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve bu yasak fiillere verilecek cezalar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde kanunda g\u00f6sterilmesi, kural\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belli olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir (AYM, E.2019\/9, K.2019\/27, 11\/4\/2019, \u00a7 13). Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesine ko\u015fut olarak 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 2. maddesinde de d\u00fczenlenen ilke, yasaklanan eylemlerin ve bu yasak eylemlere verilecek cezalar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde kanunda g\u00f6sterilmesini, kural\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belli olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir. Yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan su\u00e7a veya cezaya ili\u015fkin olgular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken ve \u00f6zellikle fiillerin bir su\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fini belirlerken su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesini anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak \u015fekilde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yakla\u015f\u0131mda bulunmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Emin Karamehmet ve di\u011ferleri<\/i> [2. B.], B. No: 2017\/4902, 28\/1\/2020, \u00a7 47). Bu nedenle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin denetlenmesinde normun mevcut deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olaya uygulan\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin yasal d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir sonuca yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmelidir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz <\/i>[1. B.], B. No: 2019\/20791, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n

17. Anayasa Mahkemesi de \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fvuruda FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcyelik su\u00e7u ba\u011flam\u0131nda su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini incelemi\u015f, ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulunmu\u015ftur (Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2018\/37695, 9\/10\/2024, \u00a7\u00a7 26-52; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, <\/i>\u00a7\u00a7 44-64; Yahya Turgut<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2021\/43694, 9\/10\/2024, \u00a7\u00a7 44-58).<\/p>\n

18. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetleri kapsayan ba\u015fvurularda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken \u00f6ncelikli meselenin ba\u015fvurucunun FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unda delil olarak kabul edilen fiilleri i\u015fledi\u011fi s\u0131rada cezai y\u00f6nden bir sorumluluk alt\u0131na sokulabilece\u011fini makul olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fini vurgulayan Anayasa Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ter\u00f6r niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmay\u0131 istedi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn hayatta kalmas\u0131na, ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine devaml\u0131 bir irade ile katk\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya konuldu\u011fu takdirde s\u00f6z konusu fiillerden dolay\u0131 cezai y\u00f6nden bir sorumluluk alt\u0131na sokulabilece\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 40; Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i>, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n

19. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7una ba\u011flanan a\u011f\u0131r cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde -\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilindi\u011finin kabul edilebilece\u011fi kesin bir tarihin verilmesi yoluna gidilmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte- \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 11) \u00f6nce yasal zeminde faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile hareket ederek hataya d\u00fc\u015fenler ile FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ama\u00e7 ve y\u00f6ntemlerini bilen \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n birbirlerinden dikkatli \u015fekilde ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmi\u015ftir (Yahya Turgut, <\/i>\u00a7 53; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 54; Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i>, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n

20. Ceza verme yetkisinin keyf\u00ee ve hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ama\u00e7larla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenebilmesi kanunilik ilkesinin kat\u0131 bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak yorumun ceza normlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmemesi ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekir. Yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan su\u00e7a veya cezaya ili\u015fkin olgular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken, \u00f6zellikle fiillerin bir su\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fini belirlerken su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesini anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak \u015fekilde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yakla\u015f\u0131mda bulunmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Emin Karamehmet ve di\u011ferleri<\/i> [2. B.], B. No: 2017\/4902, 28\/1\/2020, \u00a7 47; Adnan \u015een<\/i>, \u00a7 107; Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i>, \u00a7 48; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 62). Bu kapsamda somut olayda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olarak geni\u015fletici bir yoruma tabi tutulup tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r (Ahmet Aslan <\/i>[1. B.],<\/i> B. No: 2021\/23949, 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7 68; Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i>, \u00a7 48; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 62). Bu nedenle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin denetlenmesinde normun mevcut deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olaya uygulan\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin yasal d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir sonuca yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmelidir (Hasan Sar\u0131c\u0131<\/i>, \u00a7 48; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz<\/i>, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n

21. Ba\u015fvuruya konu mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesidir. Yarg\u0131 mercilerine g\u00f6re bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc, ba\u015ftan itibaren su\u00e7 i\u015flemek \u00fczere kurulmu\u015f yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir yap\u0131 olabilece\u011fi gibi yasal olarak faaliyet g\u00f6stermekte olan bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn sonradan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hatta ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n

22. Bir ki\u015finin yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmez. \u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na cezaland\u0131r\u0131lan bir su\u00e7tur. Bu itibarla \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesinin faaliyetinin mutlaka \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen su\u00e7lara kat\u0131lma \u015feklinde olmas\u0131 da gerekmez. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, \u00fcye ve hatta \u00f6rg\u00fct hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flememi\u015f olsa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn toplum i\u00e7in yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehlikeyi cezaland\u0131ran ve bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bir yandan da \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesini engelleme amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan bir su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr (Metin Birdal <\/i>[GK], <\/i>B. No: 2014\/15440, 22\/5\/2019,<\/i> \u00a7\u00a7 60, 61).<\/p>\n

23. Bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131ndan biri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemle \u00e7izmek gerekir. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteliklerinin mahkemece belirlenmesi bir tespit karar\u0131d\u0131r (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz,<\/i> \u00a7 14). Aksinin kabul\u00fc, hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 bulunmayan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin eylemlerinin unsur yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamamas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furur. Yukar\u0131da al\u0131nt\u0131lanan Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi gibi bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak tespitine dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bu su\u00e7 \u00f6zelinde en \u00f6nemli fonksiyonu, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hukuki varl\u0131k kazand\u0131rmas\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funu bilinebilecek h\u00e2le getirmesidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hen\u00fcz ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla herkes\u00e7e bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak bilinebilir h\u00e2le gelmedi\u011fi s\u0131rada bir \u00f6rg\u00fct ile irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 olan ki\u015filerin kas\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 hayati \u00f6nemdedir (Ahmet Aslan<\/i>, \u00a7\u00a7 50, 51; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz,<\/i> \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n

24. Di\u011fer taraftan Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan sonra dahi ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc hiyerar\u015fisi i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi tespit edilen \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 suretiyle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n bilindi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lan durumlarda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edilmedi\u011fine de karar vermi\u015ftir (Yahya Turgut, <\/i>\u00a7\u00a7 57-59).<\/p>\n

25. \u00d6te yandan vurgulamak gerekir ki bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunda Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi, bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucu itibar\u0131yla adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda isnat edilen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbuta erip ermedi\u011fi veya toplanan delillerin su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu i\u00e7in yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesi, ilkesel olarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin ilgi alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (Metin Birdal,<\/i> \u00a7 47; Y\u0131lmaz \u00c7elik <\/i>[GK], B. No: 2014\/13117, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7 45). Bundan ba\u015fka bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda hangi delillerin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nabilece\u011fi meselesi de esas itibar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (T\u00fcrk ceza muhakemesi hukuku uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Metin Birdal<\/i>, \u00a7\u00a7 67–<\/i>71).<\/p>\n

26. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi Metin Birdal <\/i>karar\u0131nda, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131nda kalan birtak\u0131m eylemlerin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesini incelemi\u015ftir (Metin Birdal<\/i>, \u00a7\u00a7 60-72). Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re yarg\u0131 mercilerince ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131s\u0131na d\u00e2hil oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren deliller birlikte incelenmeli; temel haklar kapsam\u0131nda kalan her bir delil ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131, niteli\u011fi, bilinirli\u011fi, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiddetin t\u00fcr\u00fc ve yo\u011funlu\u011fu ile somut olay\u0131n ilgili di\u011fer \u015fartlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilmelidir (Metin Birdal<\/i>, \u00a7 72). Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nan dernek \u00fcyeli\u011fi ve toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lma delilleri de bu ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde incelenmelidir. Nitekim Yarg\u0131taya g\u00f6re FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye m\u00fczahir oldu\u011fu tespit edilen derne\u011fe \u00fcye olmas\u0131 ancak ki\u015finin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc hiyerar\u015fisine d\u00e2hil olup s\u00fcreklilik, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik ve yo\u011funluk g\u00f6steren faaliyetleri tespit edildi\u011fi takdirde mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kabul edilebilir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz,<\/i> \u00a7\u00a7 17, 18, 57).<\/p>\n

27. Somut olayda Mahkeme; dernek \u00fcyeli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri, HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun b\u00f6lge talebe mesul\u00fc<\/i> olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde sorumlu d\u00fczeyde faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131yla tespit etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fctteki bu konumunun 2016 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fcte y\u00f6nelik soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucunun adalet saray\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen protesto eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 ve dernek \u00fcyeli\u011fine ili\u015fkin di\u011fer deliller bu ba\u011flamda s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bir etkiyle dikkate al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki faaliyetleri, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel eylemleri ile dosyada yer alan delillerin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucunda Mahkemenin olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul\u00fcn somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

28. Nitekim Mahkeme, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan sonra dahi ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc hiyerar\u015fisi i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi <\/i>sonucuna varm\u0131\u015f ve bu y\u00f6ndeki savunmalar\u0131na itibar etmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin bu yorumunun kanun koyucunun yasak olarak belirledi\u011fi fiilin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde geni\u015fletmedi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fine ili\u015fkin kural\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmedi\u011fi ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 netle\u015ftirirken \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ve su\u00e7un mahiyetine uygun olma konusunda \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan eylemleri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu olu\u015fumun su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131nda oldu\u011funa ve \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 bilebilecek konumda bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin var\u0131lan sonucun temelsiz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n

29. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesine y\u00f6nelik bir ihlalin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

30. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 <\/i>nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 <\/i>nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 17\/6\/2026 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H.C. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/103543) Karar Tarihi: 17\/6\/2026 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR \u200b Ba\u015fkan : \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hikmet Murat AKKAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : \u200b I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanunun su\u00e7…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11933,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11932\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}