{"id":11878,"date":"2026-08-06T12:49:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T12:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/06\/anayasa-mahkemesinden-arabuluculukla-ilgili-hatali-hak-ihlali-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-08-06T12:49:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T12:49:00","slug":"anayasa-mahkemesinden-arabuluculukla-ilgili-hatali-hak-ihlali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/08\/06\/anayasa-mahkemesinden-arabuluculukla-ilgili-hatali-hak-ihlali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"“ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130NDEN ARABULUCULUKLA \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HATALI HAK \u0130HLAL\u0130 KARARI”"},"content":{"rendered":"

AYM, Ba\u015fvurucunun Euroserve Hizmet ve \u0130\u015fletmecilik A. \u015e.’de \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p, Euroserve G\u00fcvenlik A. \u015e. ile y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc zorunlu arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci ard\u0131ndan bu \u015firkete kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, mahkemenin taraf de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini kabul ederek verdi\u011fi i\u015fe iade karar\u0131n\u0131n Sakarya BAM taraf\u0131ndan as\u0131l i\u015fveren \u015firketle arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kesin olarak kald\u0131rmas\u0131 ve ret karar\u0131n\u0131, mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali <\/a>olarak de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Bu ihlal karar\u0131, daha \u00f6nceki arabulucunun sorumlulu\u011funu tespit etti\u011fi 28.11.2024 tarih ve 2020\/39775 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda oldu\u011fu gibi, AYM’nin arabuluculuk hukukuna hakim olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir kez daha ortaya koydu.<\/p>\n

\u00d6ncelikle, AYM’nin ihlal karar\u0131 metninde 6325 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k ve net olarak zikredilen “ARABULUCULUK”<\/i> s\u00f6zc\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc “ARA BULUCULUK”<\/i> \u015feklinde 25 kez hatal\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 kabul edilebilir de\u011fil. Anayasa Mahkemesinin metinlerinde genel dil bilgisi ve yan\u0131m kurallar\u0131 kadar hukuki terimler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da hatas\u0131zl\u0131k aranmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Olay\u0131n AYM taraf\u0131ndan arabuluculuk hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesi de yanl\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015e\u00f6yle ki;<\/p>\n

Bireysel ba\u015fvuru konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, ilk derece mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucu davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fru davac\u0131ya husumet y\u00f6neltebilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ve do\u011fru taraf\u0131n davaya dahil edilmesi, HMK 124. maddesine uygun ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 ve usul ekonomisi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yerindedir.<\/p>\n

Ancak sonras\u0131nda davaya eklenen tarafla ilgili bir arabuluculuk s\u00fcrecinin yoklu\u011funun mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ihmali hatal\u0131d\u0131r. Nitekim BAM da buna i\u015faret ederek kabul karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Arabuluculuk dava \u015fart\u0131, daval\u0131yla dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce arabuluculuk s\u00fcrecinin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi hem 6325 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda Arabuluculuk Kanunu hem de 7036 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131k bi\u00e7imde zorunlu.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin yeterli bilgi ve bilince sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, arabuluculuk s\u00fcrecinde ve davada husumeti yanl\u0131\u015f \u015firkete y\u00f6neltmesi, dava \u015fart\u0131 eksikli\u011fine neden olur ve bu eksiklik HMK m. 114 gere\u011fince sonradan (davada taraf de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi vb yollarla) giderilemez; maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki \u201c<\/i>Di\u011fer kanunlarda yer alan dava \u015fartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler sakl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d <\/i>ifadesi arabuluculuk dava \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n sonradan tamamlanmas\u0131na engel. Bu engel kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ne istinaf mahkemesinin ne de Anayasa Mahkemesinin arabuluculuk dava \u015fart\u0131 eksikli\u011fini genel hukuk ilkeleri veya temel haklara at\u0131fla bertaraf etme \u015fans\u0131 olabilir.<\/p>\n

Pek \u00e7ok hukuk\u00e7u taraf\u0131ndan ele\u015ftirilse de, HUAK ve dava \u015fart\u0131 arabuluculuk h\u00fck\u00fcmleri var olduk\u00e7a; yokmu\u015f gibi kabul edilerek, usulu ve hukuku zorlamak, genel hukuk ilkelerine dayan\u0131larak yasal zorunluluklar\u0131, \u00f6zellikle AYM eliyle, yok saymak sorunlu ve hukuki belirlilik – e\u015fitlik a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan sak\u0131ncal\u0131 bir yol. Usul ekonomisi veya mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6zellikle AYM, karar\u0131yla, net yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7irilemeyece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesindeyim.<\/p>\n

Davan\u0131n bu gerek\u00e7elerle reddi gerekirken, kabul edilmesi hukuken hatal\u0131d\u0131r ve bunu tespit eden kesin BAM karar\u0131n\u0131n hak ihlali do\u011furmas\u0131 da s\u00f6z konusu olamaz.<\/p>\n

Hatal\u0131 tarafla arabuluculuk ve dava s\u00fcreci y\u00fcr\u00fctmesi davac\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun hak kayb\u0131na da yol a\u00e7mam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u0130\u015f Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda davac\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu do\u011fru \u015firketle arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcp ard\u0131ndan yeniden dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015f Kanunu 20. maddesine g\u00f6re, “Arabulucuya ba\u015fvurmaks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddi h\u00e2linde ret karar\u0131 taraflara resen tebli\u011f edilir. KES\u0130NLE\u015eEN RET KARARININ da resen TEBL\u0130\u011e\u0130NDEN itibaren \u0130K\u0130 HAFTA \u0130\u00c7\u0130NDE ARABULUCUYA BA\u015eVURULAB\u0130L\u0130R.”<\/i> der.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 BAM’\u0131n i\u015fe iade davas\u0131n\u0131 kesin ret karar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7inde arabuluculuk ba\u015fvurusuyla dava \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 elde edip yeni bir dava a\u00e7arak hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n pe\u015finden gitmek yerine, AYM’ye bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131n\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihlal karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda, bu karardan do\u011fan menfaatine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k; savundu\u011fu i\u015fe iade hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc 4 y\u0131l sonra verilen hak ihlali sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak yeni yarg\u0131lamada, iki haftal\u0131k arabuluculu\u011fa ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi AYM s\u00fcrecinde ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan<\/u>, i\u015fe iade karar\u0131 alma \u015fans\u0131 hukuken kalmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenlerle, Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131<\/a>n\u0131, olay\u0131n hukukunu do\u011fru tespit a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan eksik ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle \u00e7eli\u015fkili buluyorum.<\/p>\n

\"Av.<\/a><\/p>\n

Av. M. Turgay BiLGE<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

>> AYM karar\u0131n\u0131n tam metni i\u00e7in TIKLAYINIZ<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

AYM, Ba\u015fvurucunun Euroserve Hizmet ve \u0130\u015fletmecilik A. \u015e.’de \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131p, Euroserve G\u00fcvenlik A. \u015e. ile y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc zorunlu arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci ard\u0131ndan bu \u015firkete kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, mahkemenin taraf de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini kabul ederek verdi\u011fi i\u015fe iade karar\u0131n\u0131n Sakarya BAM taraf\u0131ndan as\u0131l i\u015fveren \u015firketle arabuluculuk s\u00fcreci y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kesin olarak kald\u0131rmas\u0131 ve ret karar\u0131n\u0131, mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11879,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11878\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11879"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}