{"id":11798,"date":"2026-07-29T14:04:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-29T14:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/29\/yargitay-10-ceza-dairesinin-2021-1523-e-2022-7238-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-07-29T14:04:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-29T14:04:00","slug":"yargitay-10-ceza-dairesinin-2021-1523-e-2022-7238-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/29\/yargitay-10-ceza-dairesinin-2021-1523-e-2022-7238-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesi’nin 2021\/1523 E., 2022\/7238 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n

10. Ceza Dairesi<\/strong><\/p>\n

2021\/1523 E., 2022\/7238 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mahkemesi :Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7lar : 1- Kenevir ekme 2- Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma
\nH\u00fck\u00fcmler : 1- Mahk\u00fbmiyet; Antalya 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 06\/10\/2020 – 2020\/196 esas ve 2020\/304 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 (Her iki su\u00e7tan t\u00fcm san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda)<\/p>\n

2- \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddi; Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. Ceza Dairesinin 03\/12\/2020 2020\/1859 esas ve 2020\/1881 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 (Her iki su\u00e7tan t\u00fcm san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda)<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafileri taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; temyiz edenlerin s\u0131fat\u0131, ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi, karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve temyiz sebeplerine g\u00f6re dosya incelendi.<\/p>\n

GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:<\/strong><\/p>\n

San\u0131k … m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin isteminin h\u00fckmedilen ceza s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re CMK\u2019n\u0131n 299. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek duru\u015fmas\u0131z inceleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

A- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7undan verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

H\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesinden sonra, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Antalya L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 26\/05\/2022 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201c…temyiz hakk\u0131mdan vazge\u00e7ti\u011fimi beyan eder, yine sizlerden alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fum cezan\u0131n onaylanarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ilgili birimlere g\u00f6nderilmesini sayg\u0131lar\u0131mla arz ederim.\u201d \u015feklindeki beyan\u0131n\u0131n temyiz iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7me niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyizden vazge\u00e7me nedeniyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n

B- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda kenevir ekme su\u00e7undan verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde:
\nSan\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kenevir ekme su\u00e7undan h\u00fckmolunan 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 286\/2-a maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ilk derece mahkemelerinden verilen be\u015f y\u0131l veya daha az hapis cezalar\u0131 ile miktar\u0131 ne olursa olsun adli para cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine dair b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz isteminin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 298. maddesi uyar\u0131nca REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

C- San\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7undan verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 288. ve 294. maddelerinde yer alan d\u00fczenlemeler ile 289. maddesinde say\u0131lan kesin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri dikkate al\u0131narak, san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafilerinin dilek\u00e7elerinde belirttikleri temyiz sebeplerinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilerek, an\u0131lan sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n

1- 17.03.2020 tarihli arama tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131klar … ile …’in ikameti olan adreste yap\u0131lan araman\u0131n saat 14.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde arama izninin saat 15.00-17.30 aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcreyi kapsayacak \u015fekilde verildi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, araman\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan itirazlar \u00fczerine ilk derece mahkemesince araman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 saatin tespiti i\u00e7in aramaya ili\u015fkin video kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fiye verilerek al\u0131nan raporda aramaya ili\u015fkin video kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n 11.52-14.56 aras\u0131nda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, dinlenen tutanak tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n araman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 saat dilimini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirttikleri, tutanak tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n kamera kayd\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan cihaz\u0131n saati konusunda yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k olabilece\u011fini beyan ettikleri, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrindeki bilgiler, tutanak tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; araman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 saatin tespit edilmesi i\u00e7in aramada haz\u0131r bulunan mahalle muhtar\u0131 ve muhtarl\u0131k azas\u0131 ile il\u00e7e tar\u0131m g\u00f6revlisinin de tan\u0131k olarak bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fclerine ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131, kolluk taraf\u0131ndan arama s\u0131ras\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan kamera kay\u0131t cihaz\u0131n\u0131n arama s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki kay\u0131t saatinde yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu ile kamera kayd\u0131ndaki bilgilere g\u00f6re araman\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde belirtilen saatte yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkiye mahal vermeyecek \u015fekilde tespit edilmesi, araman\u0131n Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde belirtilen saat 15.00’dan \u00f6nce yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi halinde araman\u0131n ve elde edilen delilllerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

2- Kabule g\u00f6re de; \u0130lk derece mahkemesince araman\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu kabul edilmesine ra\u011fmen, san\u0131klar\u0131n ikrarlar\u0131 ile kendi su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na yard\u0131m ve hizmette bulunduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanm\u0131\u015fsa da; san\u0131klar\u0131n ikrarlar\u0131 olsa da Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde belirtilen saatler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yap\u0131lan araman\u0131n Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 38. maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile CMK’n\u0131n 206. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi, 217. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 289. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (i) bendi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 yolla elde edilen delil ile bu delillerden hareketle elde edilen delillerin de, zehirli a\u011fac\u0131n meyvesi de zehirli olaca\u011f\u0131 olgusuyla ve san\u0131klara isnat olunan su\u00e7un maddi konusu olan uyu\u015fturucu maddelerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6ntemle elde edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7un maddi konusu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131; buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak su\u00e7un yasal kurucu unsuru olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beraatleri yerine mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n

Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde olup, Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. Ceza Dairesinin 03\/12\/2020 tarih, 2020\/1859 esas ve .\/.. 2020\/1881 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, bozman\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n bu su\u00e7tan TAHL\u0130YELER\u0130NE, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7tan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde sal\u0131verilmelerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ilgili Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n

28\/02\/2019 tarihli Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 304\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca dosyan\u0131n Antalya 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, Ba\u015fkan Vekili …’\u00fcn san\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7undan verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile bozulmas\u0131 ve san\u0131k …’e de sirayet ettirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7esi ve oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile, di\u011fer y\u00f6nlerden oy birli\u011fi ile,
\n02\/06\/2022 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n

DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130K GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/p>\n

17.03.2020 tarihli arama tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131klar\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131klar … ile …’in ikameti olan adreste yap\u0131lan araman\u0131n saat 14.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde arama izninin saat 15.00-17.30 aras\u0131nda verildi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, araman\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan itirazlar \u00fczerine ilk derece mahkemesince araman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 saatin tespiti i\u00e7in araman\u0131n kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin video kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fiye verilerek al\u0131nan raporda, aramaya ili\u015fkin video kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n 11.52-14.56 aras\u0131nda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, mahkemece dinlenen tutanak tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n yeminli beyanlar\u0131nda arama yap\u0131lan saati hat\u0131rlamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirttikleri, tutanak tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131, al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporu ve kolluk taraf\u0131ndan tutulan arama tutana\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7eriklerine g\u00f6re; Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yaz\u0131l\u0131 arama emrinde belirtilen saatten \u00f6nce araman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lan araman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 arama sonucu ele ge\u00e7irilen uyu\u015fturucu maddelerin Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 38. maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131 ile CMK’n\u0131n 206. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi, 217. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 289. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (i) bendi uyar\u0131nca \u201csu\u00e7un maddi konusu\u201d ve \u201csu\u00e7un delili\u201d olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131, mahkemece yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n da yeterli oldu\u011fu, somut olayda su\u00e7un maddi konusunun bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131klar … ve …’un at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan beraatlerine, bu durumun hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcm temyizden vazge\u00e7me nedeniyle incelenmeyen san\u0131k …’a CMK\u2019n\u0131n 306. maddesi gere\u011fince sirayetine karar verilmesi ve h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bu nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 kan\u0131s\u0131nda oldu\u011fumdan say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun bozma gerek\u00e7esine kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum. 02.06.2022<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 10. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/1523 E., 2022\/7238 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Mahkemesi :Ceza Dairesi Su\u00e7lar : 1- Kenevir ekme 2- Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma H\u00fck\u00fcmler : 1- Mahk\u00fbmiyet; Antalya 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 06\/10\/2020 – 2020\/196 esas ve 2020\/304 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 (Her iki su\u00e7tan t\u00fcm san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda) 2- \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddi; Antalya B\u00f6lge…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11799,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11798\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}