{"id":11685,"date":"2026-07-18T09:50:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-18T09:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/18\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-6905-e-2024-140-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-07-18T09:50:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-18T09:50:00","slug":"yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-6905-e-2024-140-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/18\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2022-6905-e-2024-140-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2022\/6905 E., 2024\/140 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/p>\n

2022\/6905 E., 2024\/140 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : Sakarya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2022\/502 E., 2022\/1441 K.
\nKARAR : Esastan ret
\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Kocaeli 7. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nSAYISI : 2021\/288 E., 2021\/175 K.<\/p>\n

\nTaraflar aras\u0131ndaki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. DAVA<\/strong>
\nDavac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi … aras\u0131nda 04.10.2007 tarihli 21321 yevmiye numaral\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, …’un payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 2821 parsel numaras\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 4.000,00 TL bedelle davac\u0131ya satmay\u0131 vaat ve taahh\u00fct etti\u011fini, sat\u0131\u015f bedelinin tamam\u0131n\u0131n nakden ve pe\u015finen \u00f6dendi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin tasarrufuna b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki engellerin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin m\u00fcvekkiline devredilece\u011finin taahh\u00fct edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek daval\u0131lara ait hisselerin iptali ile davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\nII. CEVAP<\/strong>
\nDaval\u0131lar vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n muris ve murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n zilyetli\u011finde oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n tasarrufuna ge\u00e7medi\u011fini, bedelinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden usulden reddini mahkeme aksi kanaatte olursa davan\u0131n esastan reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/strong>
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131nda; davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle usulden reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>
\nA. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
\nDavac\u0131 vekili; s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan “i\u015fbu gayrimenkul\u00fcn \u00fczerinde bulunan ipote\u011fin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na m\u00fcteakip ilgili tapu sicili m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde kat’i fera\u011f takririni verece\u011fimi beyan ve taahh\u00fct ederim” \u015feklindeki \u015fart\u0131n geciktirici \u015fart oldu\u011funu, \u015fart\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesiyle birlikte hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n da tam anlam\u0131yla do\u011faca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 1\/2’si m\u00fcteveffa …, di\u011fer 1\/2’si … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 iken Akbank lehine ipotek tesis edildi\u011fini, icra takibi sonucu Giri\u015fim (G\u00fcven) Varl\u0131k Y\u00f6netim taraf\u0131ndan 15.04.2014 tarihinde ipote\u011fin paraya \u00e7evrilmesi yolu ile … hissesi devral\u0131narak alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsil edildi\u011fini, muris \u0130smail’in 1\/2 hissesinin bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131karak bor\u00e7tan ari konuma geldi\u011fini, ifa kabiliyetinin de bu tarihte do\u011fdu\u011funu belirterek h\u00fckm\u00fcn kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong>
\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\nDavac\u0131 vekili; istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nDava, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n1. Kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 29 uncu maddesinden alan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri, T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 237 inci maddesi ile T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 706 \u0131nc\u0131 ve Noterlik Kanunu’nun 89 uncu maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca noter \u00f6n\u00fcnde re\u2019sen d\u00fczenlenmesi gereken, bir ba\u015fka anlat\u0131mla ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi resmi \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nan, tam iki tarafa bor\u00e7 y\u00fckleyen ve ki\u015fisel hak sa\u011flayan s\u00f6zle\u015fme t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. Vaat alacakl\u0131s\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile m\u00fclkiyet devir borcu y\u00fcklenen sat\u0131c\u0131dan edim yerine getirilmedi\u011finde T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 716 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesi uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131nda borcun h\u00fckmen yerine getirilmesini isteyebilir.<\/p>\n

2. Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden do\u011fan davalar i\u00e7in \u00f6zel bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 146 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi uygulan\u0131r ve bu s\u00fcre s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131 ile i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar. Ancak sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 vaat edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile veya fiilen sat\u0131\u015f vaadini kabul eden ki\u015fiye yani vaat alacakl\u0131s\u0131na teslim edilmi\u015f ise on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 2 inci maddesinde yer alan \u201cd\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma kural\u0131\u201d ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan dinlenmez.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme
\nSomut olaya gelince; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi 04.10.2007 tarihinde akdedilmi\u015f; dava ise, 30.12.2020 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131lar davaya kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde sunduklar\u0131 02.02.2021 tarihli cevap dilek\u00e7esiyle zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def’inde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n tasarrufuna terk ve teslim edildi\u011fi, vaat bor\u00e7lusu taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a beyan edilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n fiilen olmasa da hukuken vaat alacakl\u0131s\u0131na teslim edildi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir. Bu durumda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131nda bulunmak, hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 niteli\u011findedir. Mahkemece davac\u0131n\u0131n esas talebi hakk\u0131nda olumlu olumsuz bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

VI. KARAR<\/strong>
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle
\nTemyiz olunan, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

Pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131lan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana iadesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

11.01.2024 tarihinde kesin olmak \u00fczere oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/6905 E., 2024\/140 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Sakarya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2022\/502 E., 2022\/1441 K. KARAR : Esastan ret \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Kocaeli 7. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2021\/288 E., 2021\/175 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11686,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11685\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11686"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}