{"id":11623,"date":"2026-07-12T14:10:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-12T14:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/12\/yargitay-5-hukuk-dairesinin-2025-2234-e-2025-4269-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-07-12T14:10:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-12T14:10:00","slug":"yargitay-5-hukuk-dairesinin-2025-2234-e-2025-4269-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/07\/12\/yargitay-5-hukuk-dairesinin-2025-2234-e-2025-4269-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 5. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2025\/2234 E., 2025\/4269 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>5. Hukuk Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>2025\/2234 E., 2025\/4269 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN<br \/>\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 16. Hukuk Dairesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2024\/1882 Esas, 2024\/2219 Karar<\/p>\n<p>\nKARAR : Esastan ret<br \/>\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Gelibolu 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2023\/720 Esas, 2024\/265 Karar<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki 4650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;la de\u011fi\u015fik 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanunu&#8217;nun (2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 10 uncu maddesine dayanan kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin tespiti ve kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yol olarak tapudan terkini davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak, davan\u0131n yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin kald\u0131rma karar\u0131 \u00fczerine yeniden yarg\u0131lama yapan \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurular\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmekle; s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. DAVA<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 idare vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u00c7anakkale ili, &#8230;, &#8230; k\u00f6y\u00fc 1834 parsel (yenileme ile 523 ada 1 parsel) say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin tespiti ile kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yol olarak tapudan terkini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. CEVAP<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131lar vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Gelibolu il\u00e7e merkezine ve &#8230; k\u00f6y\u00fc merkezine \u00e7ok yak\u0131n oldu\u011funu, profesyonel anlamda tar\u0131m yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Gelibolu-Ke\u015fan karayoluna yak\u0131n olmas\u0131, denize ve tatil alanlar\u0131na yak\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131, DS\u0130 Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan projeler uygulanmas\u0131, yer alt\u0131 sular\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, yat\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n bu tip tar\u0131m arazileri almak istemesi nedeniyle b\u00f6lgede metrekare birim fiyatlar\u0131n\u0131n olduk\u00e7a artt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin tespit edilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ve kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin tespiti ile daval\u0131 tarafa \u00f6denmesine, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na olan tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n yol olarak tapudan terkinine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<br \/>\n1. Davac\u0131 idare vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; kapitalizasyon faiz oran\u0131n\u0131n tespitinde dikkate al\u0131nan unsurlar\u0131n m\u00fckerrerlik olu\u015fturacak \u015fekilde objektif de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f oran\u0131n\u0131n tayininde de esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle objektif de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f oran\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksek uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kuru tar\u0131m arazisi olarak nitelendirildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kapitalizasyon faiz oran\u0131n\u0131n %6 yerine %5 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, \u00fcretim masraflar\u0131n\u0131n br\u00fct gelirin 1\/3\u2019\u00fc oran\u0131nda al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n bedeli y\u00fckseltti\u011fini, mevcut irtifak de\u011fer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkili idare lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti takdir edilmemesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Daval\u0131lar vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz i\u00e7in belirlenen bedelin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n konumu itibar\u0131yla k\u0131ymetli bir b\u00f6lgede yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayn\u0131 kamula\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00e7evresindeki kuru tar\u0131m arazileri i\u00e7in daha y\u00fcksek metrekare birim fiyatlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fini, objektif de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck belirlendi\u011fini, Anayasa Mahkemesinin 01.08.2023 tarihli Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan 2022\/83 Esas, 2223\/69 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile yasal faiz i\u015fletilmesi nedeniyle enflasyon kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda olu\u015fan de\u011fer kayb\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeline yasal faiz i\u015fletilmesine ili\u015fkin 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019da yer alan d\u00fczenlemeyi iptal etti\u011fini, bu nedenle kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeline dava tarihinden itibaren kamu alacaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen en y\u00fcksek faiz oran\u0131 \u00fczerinden faize h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<br \/>\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile kuru tar\u0131m arazisi niteli\u011findeki dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza net geliri esas al\u0131narak de\u011fer bi\u00e7ildi\u011fi, de\u011fer bi\u00e7ilirken de y\u00f6re ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygun m\u00fcnavebe \u00fcr\u00fcnleri se\u00e7ilmek suretiyle dava tarihinde ge\u00e7erli olan resmi veri listesi esas al\u0131n\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yer \u0130l\u00e7e Tar\u0131m ve Orman M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc verilerinde belirtilen masraflarla ekonomik tar\u0131m yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip \u00fcretim masraflar\u0131n\u0131n br\u00fct gelirin 1\/3&#8217;\u00fc oran\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, niteli\u011fi ve konumuna g\u00f6re %5 kapitalizasyon faizi ile makul oranda objektif de\u011fer art\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 unsur oran\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131nda yer alan irtifak hakk\u0131 nedeniyle makul oranda de\u011fer azal\u0131\u015f\u0131 uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n kadastro yenileme i\u015flemleri sonucu olu\u015fan yeni y\u00fcz\u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fc \u00fczerinden hesaplama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu, 01.08.2023 tarihli ve 32266 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan Anayasa Mahkemesinin 05.04.2023 tarihli ve 2022\/83 Esas, 2023\/69 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 04.11.1983 tarihli 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 24.04.2001 tarihli ve 4650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 5 inci maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 10 uncu maddesine 11.04.2013 tarihli 6459 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 6 nc\u0131 maddesiyle eklenen dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n iptal edildi\u011fi, eldeki davan\u0131n 01.08.2023 tarihinden \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle bu s\u00fcrenin bitiminden itibaren kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeline yasal faiz uygulanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn do\u011fru oldu\u011fu, davan\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi davac\u0131 idare lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesinde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle taraf vekillerinin istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong><\/p>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<p>A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>B. Temyiz Sebepleri<br \/>\n1. Davac\u0131 idare vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sebepleri tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sebepleri tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e<br \/>\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuk\u00ee Nitelendirme<br \/>\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, &#8230; olarak davac\u0131 idare ile daval\u0131 tapu malikleri aras\u0131ndaki kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin tespiti istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. De\u011ferlendirme<br \/>\n1. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 371 inci maddesinde yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Arazi niteli\u011findeki \u00c7anakkale ili, &#8230;, &#8230; k\u00f6y\u00fc 523 ada 1 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 11 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (f) bendi uyar\u0131nca oldu\u011fu gibi kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde getirece\u011fi net gelir esas al\u0131narak de\u011fer bi\u00e7ilmesi yerindedir.<\/p>\n<p>3. H\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi kurulu raporunda 2019 y\u0131l\u0131 Gelibolu \u0130l\u00e7e Tar\u0131m ve Orman M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc verilerinin uygulanmas\u0131, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n belirtilen \u00f6zelliklerine ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenen kapitalizasyon faiz oran\u0131 ve objektif de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>4. 01.08.2023 tarihli ve 32266 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mlanan Anayasa Mahkemesinin 05.04.2023 tarihli ve 2022\/83 Esas, 2023\/69 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 04.11.1983 tarihli ve 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 24.04.2001 tarihli ve 4650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5 inci maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 10 uncu maddesine 11.04.2013 tarihli 6459 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 6 nc\u0131 maddesiyle eklenen dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 iptal edilmi\u015ftir. Dava 01.08.2023 tarihinden \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan; \u201c\u0130ptal kararlar\u0131 geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmez.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc ve Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Kurulunun; \u201cHer davada a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte tespit edilen vaziyet h\u00fckme ittihaz olunmas\u0131 iktiza eylemesine\u2026\u201d gerek\u00e7esini i\u00e7eren 28.11.1956 tarihli ve 15\/15 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; \u201cHer dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki fiili ve hukuk\u00ee duruma g\u00f6re karara ba\u011flan\u0131r.\u201d genel hukuk\u00ee prensibini h\u00e2vi Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 10.05.2017 tarihli ve 2017\/3-990 Esas, 2017\/954 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedeline 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 10 uncu maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten 4 ay sonras\u0131ndan ba\u015flamak \u00fczere yasal faiz uygulanmas\u0131 do\u011frudur.<\/p>\n<p>5. Taraflar\u0131n iddia, savunma ve dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki nitelendirilmesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lamaya h\u00e2kim olan ilkelere, ispat kurallar\u0131na ve temyiz olunan kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re davac\u0131 idare vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131lar vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraf\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>6. H\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demeye ili\u015fkin bendinde toplam kamula\u015ft\u0131rma bedelinin hatal\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi suretiyle infazda teredd\u00fcte yol a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n<p>Ne var ki bu hatan\u0131n giderilmesi yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 370 inci maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>VI. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n<p>1. Davac\u0131 idare vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131lar vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n<p>2. Temyiz olunan, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA, daval\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demeye ili\u015fkin (3) numaral\u0131 bendinde yer alan &#8220;2.160.068,42&#8221; say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131, yerine &#8220;2.738.252,00&#8221; say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131dan pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenildi\u011finde iadesine,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>\n27.03.2025 tarihinde oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KAR\u015eI OY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 21.01.2004 tarihli ve 2004\/10-44 Esas, 2004\/19 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ve m\u00fcstakar kararlar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade edildi\u011fi \u00fczere Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm halini almam\u0131\u015f derdest davalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanmalar\u0131 gerekir. Zira Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal kararlar\u0131 usul\u00ee kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131n ve aleyhe bozma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n istisnas\u0131n\u0131 te\u015fkil ederler.<\/p>\n<p>Bu nedenle somut olayda; daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n 46 nc\u0131 maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca kamu alacaklar\u0131na uygulanacak en y\u00fcksek faizin uygulanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 26 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilecek bir temyiz talebinin (Daval\u0131lar vekillerinin 27.12.2024 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki \u201cFaize\u201d ili\u015fkin talebi) de dosya m\u00fcnderecat\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 2942 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanununun 10 uncu maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn iptali y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen ve 01.08.2023 tarihli, 32266 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan 05.04.2023 tarihli ve 2022\/83 Esas &#8211; 2023\/69 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda karar verilmeli ve \u201cdava tarihinden itibaren mahkeme karar tarihine kadar\u201d Anayasan\u0131n 46 nc\u0131 maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc nazara al\u0131narak faize h\u00fckmedilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle iken, eldeki derdest davada Anayasa Mahkemesi iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun di\u011fer y\u00f6nleriyle kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u201cD\u00fczeltilerek Onanma Karar\u0131\u201dna (faize ili\u015fkin y\u00f6n\u00fcyle) ve faizle ilgili 4 No\u2019lu \u201cDe\u011ferlendirme g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcndeki gerek\u00e7eye\u201d a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z nedenlerle kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz. 27.03.2025\n <\/p>\n<div class=\"article-source py-3 small \">\n    <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 5. Hukuk Dairesi 2025\/2234 E., 2025\/4269 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 16. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2024\/1882 Esas, 2024\/2219 Karar KARAR : Esastan ret \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Gelibolu 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2023\/720 Esas, 2024\/265 Karar Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki 4650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;la de\u011fi\u015fik 2942 say\u0131l\u0131&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11623\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}