\u00dczerindeki bina y\u0131k\u0131larak arsa h\u00e2line gelen ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kat malikleri arsa pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ortak m\u00fclkiyet esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re malik olacaklar\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00e2len dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi ve davan\u0131n konusuz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
arg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 10.09.2025 tarihli, 2023\/648 E., 2025\/512 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hukuk Genel Kurulu<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2023\/648 E., 2025\/512 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 6. Hukuk Dairesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili ve daval\u0131 … vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 5. Hukuk Dairesince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda bozulmu\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Direnme karar\u0131 davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili ve kat\u0131lma yolu ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan g\u00fcndem ve dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n I. DAVA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131lar vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkillerinin \u0130zmir ili Konak il\u00e7esi … Mahallesi 66 06… parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 4 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn, daval\u0131lar\u0131n ise 1, 2, 3, 5 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin maliki olduklar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkillerine ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn, 1 ve 5 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerden m2 olarak daha b\u00fcy\u00fck oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkillerine ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn konumu itibariyle di\u011fer ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerden farkl\u0131l\u0131k arzetti\u011fini, buna kar\u015f\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillerine ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm i\u00e7in d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck arsa pay\u0131 tahsis edilmi\u015f iken daval\u0131lara ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlere de\u011ferinden daha fazla arsa pay\u0131 tahsis edildi\u011fini, \u00f6zellikle daval\u0131lardan 1 ve 5 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcme ait arsa pay\u0131 ile m\u00fcvekkillerine ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn arsa paylar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fartlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck orans\u0131zl\u0131k bulundu\u011funu, apartman\u0131n riskli yap\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 6306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda y\u0131k\u0131l\u0131p, yeniden in\u015fa edilece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden tespit edilmesine ve tapu siciline tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n II. CEVAP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Daval\u0131 … vekili ve daval\u0131 as\u0131l … ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7elerinde, a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 kabul etmediklerini, anayap\u0131n\u0131n 1967 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131 kullanma izin belgelerinin 1968 tarihli oldu\u011funu, kat m\u00fclkiyetinin 51 y\u0131l \u00f6nce kuruldu\u011funu, yar\u0131m as\u0131rd\u0131r hi\u00e7bir kat maliki taraf\u0131ndan arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin dairesinin ve di\u011fer dairelerin cinsinin mesken niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkiline ait dairenin bulundu\u011fu be\u015finci kat\u0131n, di\u011fer dairelerden daha iyi k\u00f6rfez manzaras\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n 1968 y\u0131l\u0131nda kuruldu\u011funu, bilirki\u015filerce 50 y\u0131l \u00f6nceki fiili durumun da net olarak tespit edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin 11.10.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/132 Esas, 2018\/1377 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2 72… alanl\u0131 arsada tesis edilmi\u015f kat irtifak\u0131na g\u00f6re 5 katl\u0131 5 daireli olarak 1972 y\u0131l\u0131nda in\u015fa edildi\u011fi, binan\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n 10 arsa pay\u0131 olarak 5 e\u015fit par\u00e7aya b\u00f6l\u00fcnmek suretiyle her bir daireye 2\/10’ar e\u015fit arsa pay\u0131 verildi\u011fi, bina ilk yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kat irtifak\u0131 kuruldu\u011fu tarihte dairelerin alanlar\u0131, konumlar\u0131, de\u011ferleri, mimari \u00f6zellikleri, ula\u015f\u0131m ve ta\u015f\u0131ma imk\u00e2nlar\u0131, \u0131s\u0131, \u0131\u015f\u0131k, g\u00fcne\u015f, r\u00fczgar, cephe durumlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmadan sadece say\u0131 hesab\u0131na g\u00f6re bir payla\u015f\u0131m yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, zemin kat dairenin ortak olan arka bah\u00e7eyi kullanmas\u0131, arkada istinat duvar\u0131na bak\u0131yor olmas\u0131 ve daire alan\u0131 teras dairenin \u00f6n arka teraslar\u0131 kullan\u0131yor olmas\u0131, \u00fczerinde kiremit \u00e7at\u0131 olmamas\u0131, iklim ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan daha \u00e7ok etkilenmesi, daire alan\u0131 ve 5 kat merdivenle ula\u015f\u0131m\u0131 4 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm \u00fczerinde teras alanlar\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan iklim a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olumsuz etkilenmesi gibi fakt\u00f6rler dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 66 06… parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda; 1 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm maliki …’nin 2\/10 arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n 9\/44 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine, 1. kat 2 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc maliki …’\u0131n 2\/10 olan arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n 10\/44 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine, 2. kat 3 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc maliki …’un 2\/10 olan arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n 10\/44 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine, 3. kat 4 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc malikleri … ve …’nun 2\/10 olan arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n 10\/44 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine, \u00e7at\u0131 5. kat maliki …’\u0131n 2\/10 olan arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n 5\/44 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 …’tan 1 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 15.10.2018 tarihinde devralan … ve …’dan 5 nolu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ayn\u0131 tarihte devralan … vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n B. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n\n\n\n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin 12.07.2021 tarihli ve 2019\/912 Esas, 2021\/1677 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; 66 06… parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ana ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki binan\u0131n 21.08.2020 tarihinde y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Kat M\u00fclkiyeti Kanunu’nun 47\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince anayap\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc harap olmu\u015fsa, ana gayrimenkul \u00fczerindeki kat m\u00fclkiyetinin kendili\u011finden sona erece\u011fi, ana ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki binan\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta hakl\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle yarg\u0131lama gideri, har\u00e7 ve vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar\u0131n istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine HMK’n\u0131n 355. maddesi uyar\u0131nca resen yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, davan\u0131n konusuz kalmas\u0131 nedeniyle esas hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n V. BOZMA VE BOZMADAN SONRAK\u0130 YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n A. Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili ile daval\u0131 … vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. Yarg\u0131tay 5. Hukuk Dairesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; B. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince Verilen Direnme Karar\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; Kat M\u00fclkiyeti Kanunu’nun 47\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re anayap\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc harap oldu\u011fundan kat m\u00fclkiyetinin kendili\u011finden sona erdi\u011fi, buna ili\u015fkin sicilin d\u00fczeltilmesinin idari bir i\u015flem oldu\u011fu, 6306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna g\u00f6re y\u0131k\u0131larak arsa h\u00e2line gelen ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda, payda\u015flar\u0131n yeniden bina yapmaya karar vermeleri h\u00e2linde yeni yap\u0131lacak binan\u0131n nas\u0131l yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi, arsa payda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n kendi aralar\u0131nda ve binay\u0131 yapacak y\u00fcklenici ile anla\u015fmalar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, aksine kabul\u00fcn afet riski alt\u0131ndaki alanlar\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm s\u00fcrecini de uzataca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle direnme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n VI. TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n\n\n\n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen direnme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili ve kat\u0131lma yolu ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. Davac\u0131lar vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; istinaf mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n yasaya ve hakkaniyete ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131lar\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcniyetli olduklar\u0131n\u0131, gerek ilk derece gerekse istinaf mahkemesinden tedbiren y\u0131k\u0131m\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep ettiklerini ancak taleplerinin kabul g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, daval\u0131lar\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131n tamamen sebepsiz zenginle\u015fmeye ve haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kar elde etmeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. Daval\u0131 … vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; daval\u0131 m\u00fcvekkil d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki daval\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7abalar\u0131 ile dosya istinaf a\u015famas\u0131ndayken binan\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeniden kat m\u00fclkiyeti kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davan\u0131n konusuz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istinaf mahkemesinin dosyadaki belgelere, delillere, bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re inceleme yaparak karar vermesi gerekti\u011fini, arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n anayap\u0131n\u0131n kat irtifak\u0131 veya kat m\u00fclkiyeti stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc korudu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131labildi\u011fini, i\u015fbu davan\u0131n da s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. Daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili kat\u0131lma yolu ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011finde davac\u0131lar\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta hakl\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespitlerin bulunmas\u0131 ve m\u00fcvekkillerinin yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine mahkum edilmesi nedeniyle kat\u0131lma yolu ile temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurduklar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n iyiniyetli olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporunda m\u00fcvekkillerine ait \u00e7at\u0131 kat\u0131 5 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm ile zemin 1 No.lu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn \u00f6zelliklerinin dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporunda ekenomik de\u011ferden bahsedilmedi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n 1968 tarihi itibariyle imar durumlar\u0131n\u0131n sorulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u00f6netim plan\u0131n\u0131n celp edilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n C. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k<\/p>\n\n\n\n Direnme yolu ile Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; anata\u015f\u0131nmazdaki ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferleri ile orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesi ve tapuya tescil edilmesi istemine ili\u015fkin eldeki davada, istinaf incelemesi a\u015famas\u0131nda dava konusu ana ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki binan\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla davan\u0131n konusuz kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n D. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n\n\n\n 634 say\u0131l\u0131 Kat M\u00fclkiyeti Kanunu’nun 3, 33… . maddeleri<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. Kat M\u00fclkiyeti Kanunu\u2019nun 3. maddesinde, \u201cKat m\u00fclkiyeti, arsa pay\u0131 ve anagayrimenkuldeki ortak yerlerle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6zel bir m\u00fclkiyettir. (De\u011fi\u015fik \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kra: 23\/6\/2009-5912\/1 md.) Kat irtifak\u0131 arsa pay\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 bir irtifak \u00e7e\u015fidi olup, yap\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenecek yap\u0131 kullanma izin belgesine dayal\u0131 olarak, bu Kanunda g\u00f6sterilen \u015fartlar uyar\u0131nca kat m\u00fclkiyetine resen \u00e7evrilir. Bu i\u015flem, arsa malikinin veya kat irtifak\u0131na sahip ortak maliklerden birinin istemi ile dahi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilir\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. An\u0131lan maddede kat m\u00fclkiyeti veya kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n, bu m\u00fclkiyete konu olan anayap\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinden her birine kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n kuruldu\u011fu tarihteki, do\u011frudan do\u011fruya kat m\u00fclkiyetine ge\u00e7ilme h\u00e2linde ise, bu tarihteki de\u011feri ile oranl\u0131 olarak tahsis edilen arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n ortak m\u00fclkiyet esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi suretiyle kurulaca\u011f\u0131, arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin de\u011feri ile oranl\u0131 olarak tahsis edilmedi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde, her kat maliki veya kat irtifak\u0131 sahibinin arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in mahkemeye ba\u015fvurabilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4. Kat m\u00fclkiyeti d\u00fczeninde arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ger\u00e7ekten \u00f6nemlidir; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc kat maliklerince aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc anla\u015fma olmad\u0131k\u00e7a kap\u0131c\u0131, kaloriferci, bah\u00e7\u0131van ve bek\u00e7i giderleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan t\u00fcm y\u00f6netim giderlerine kat\u0131lmada arsa pay\u0131 esas tutulur (md. 20). Y\u00f6neticinin atanmas\u0131nda (md.34), anata\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ortak yerlerinde faydal\u0131 yenilik ve eklemeler yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda ve merkezi \u0131s\u0131nman\u0131n do\u011falgazl\u0131 bireysel \u0131s\u0131nmaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinde arsa pay\u0131 \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu aranmaktad\u0131r (md. 42). Anayap\u0131n\u0131n kamula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlere ili\u015fkin kamula\u015ft\u0131rma paras\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde arsa pay\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur (md. 40). Kat malikleri anata\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn ortak yerlerine arsa paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda -ortak m\u00fclkiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re- maliktirler ve kullanma hakk\u0131na sahiptirler (md. 16). Arsa pay\u0131 kat m\u00fclkiyetinden ve kat irtifak\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 olarak devredilemez; kat m\u00fclkiyetinin ya da kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fkas\u0131na ge\u00e7mesi, ancak ona ba\u011fl\u0131 arsa pay\u0131 ile birlikte m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (md. 5\/1). ( Mahir Ersin, Germe\u00e7: Kat M\u00fclkiyeti Hukuku, Ankara 2020, s.81).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5. Dosyada mevcut Konak Tapu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131nda \u0130zmir ili Konak il\u00e7esi … Mahallesi 66 06… parsel say\u0131l\u0131 anata\u015f\u0131nmazda 5 katl\u0131 ve 5 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131 g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, ilgili ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n y\u00f6netim plan\u0131na rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda 20.12.2017 tarihinde tapu kayd\u0131na riskli yap\u0131 \u015ferhi konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6. Davac\u0131lar vekili, kat irtifak\u0131 kurulu (dava tarihi itibariyle) anata\u015f\u0131nmazda m\u00fcvekkillerine ait ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn arsa pay\u0131 ile di\u011fer ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin arsa paylar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fartlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck orans\u0131zl\u0131k bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmek suretiyle tapu siciline tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahallinde yap\u0131lan ke\u015fif sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi kurulu raporunda ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerden her birinin konum ve b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fcklerine g\u00f6re hesaplanan de\u011ferleri ile orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak arsa pay\u0131 tahsis edilmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, bunun \u00fczerine ilk derece mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ard\u0131ndan istinaf incelemesi a\u015famas\u0131nda dava konusu anata\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 21.08.2020 tarihinde y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n https:\/\/googleads.g.doubleclick.net\/pagead\/ads?gdpr=0&client=ca-pub-2767716813561984&output=html&h=280&num_ads=1&adk=3964241534&adf=4061539958&pi=t.aa~a.2857503086~i.96~rp.4&abgtt=6&w=832&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1783359071&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=2179228452&ad_type=text_image&format=832×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hukukihaber.net%2Fbina-yikilsa-bile-kat-malikleri-arsa-uzerinde-paylari-oraninda-ortak-mulkiyet-ile-malik-olmaya-devam-eder&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=200&rw=831&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&asro=0&aimartd=4&aieuf=1&aicrs=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTAuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTQ5LjAuNzgyNy4xNTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siR29vZ2xlIENocm9tZSIsIjE0OS4wLjc4MjcuMTU1Il0sWyJDaHJvbWl1bSIsIjE0OS4wLjc4MjcuMTU1Il0sWyJOb3QpQTtCcmFuZCIsIjI0LjAuMC4wIl1dLDBd&dt=1783359066112&bpp=1&bdt=1640&idt=1&shv=r20260701&mjsv=m202607010101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D84fd0e32265cd31f%3AT%3D1781261300%3ART%3D1783359041%3AS%3DALNI_MZS-leUVJeC9jve2bonbBTSpduzTQ&gpic=UID%3D000014281633bafc%3AT%3D1781261300%3ART%3D1783359041%3AS%3DALNI_MZ-s9SN0y2AYOO4iFhJcK25CQbplA&eo_id_str=ID%3D64192e50f3c1c678%3AT%3D1781261300%3ART%3D1783359041%3AS%3DAA-Afjaw2bb8GCFt82QkfYRjSHGI&prev_fmts=0x0%2C728x280%2C420x280%2C1690x820%2C1005x124%2C832x280%2C832x280&nras=7&correlator=8464056903607&frm=20&pv=1&u_tz=180&u_his=1&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=824&u_aw=1536&u_cd=32&u_sd=1.125&dmc=16&adx=210&ady=8170&biw=1690&bih=820&scr_x=0&scr_y=4919&eid=31099343%2C95394904%2C95395662%2C31099532%2C95393484&oid=2&psts=AOrYGsnjPjVzn4uMtGdqJOHaCh8guPTrqTLulq1MDqH-KFOzfn17ZHZKawmn_fxF0DiHmpoD3OmwmngMJcpFNt1sGL-x-fis6vuqS-nP2XVOWLCcfIyt2UPJJTOQdOhZaw%2CAOrYGsk6424hmB2S_vP5a6HeRPQWmhzMsdW4ks4SOX702lnuY2LyyP-UoYJMsofzE0jPL7rGoeYzbtP_wMUdxv9F3Z3S3MyigMbL7eHPcTXKMSbGEQ%2CAOrYGslZ_0nf-VrlJkgp-ncKdzswuezV3QM60aQtAavrBDa2cykN1HCZYU9bgKc3hgDIdup9rAq1NwvTA0_nTF7a01Tl3Jrj41nbP-A_3XwaVhQ&pvsid=6841207486120787&tmod=1011994816&uas=3&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hukukihaber.net%2F&fc=1408&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C824%2C1707%2C820&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&bz=0.9&ifi=5&uci=a!5&btvi=6&fsb=1&dtd=5003<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7. Bu noktada arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda yap\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davan\u0131n konusuz kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8. Baz\u0131 h\u00e2llerde dava devam ederken dava konusu alaca\u011f\u0131n \u00f6denmesi, menkul mal\u0131n davac\u0131ya teslim edilmesi, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tahliye edilmesi gibi bir nedenle dava konusuz kalabilir. Bu h\u00e2lde mahkeme esas hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verir. Ancak dava s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen bir olay nedeniyle davan\u0131n konusuz kalm\u0131\u015f say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, art\u0131k her iki taraf\u0131n da davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesinde hi\u00e7 bir hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n kalmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Sonradan do\u011fan bir olay nedeniyle davan\u0131n konusuz kalm\u0131\u015f g\u00f6z\u00fckmesine ra\u011fmen, taraflar\u0131n davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesindeki hukuki yararlar\u0131 devam ediyorsa, dava konusuz kalmaz; davaya devam edilerek, esas hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesi gerekir (Baki Kuru, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, C. III, \u0130stanbul 2001, s.3015-3021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 9. Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan anlat\u0131mlar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda dava konusu ana ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak taraf iradeleri ile yeniden arsa paylar\u0131 belirlenmek sureti ile kat irtifak\u0131 ya da kat m\u00fclkiyeti tesis edilmemi\u015ftir. Kald\u0131 ki \u00fczerindeki bina y\u0131k\u0131larak arsa h\u00e2line gelen ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kat malikleri arsa pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ortak m\u00fclkiyet esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re malik olacaklar\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00e2len dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi ve davan\u0131n konusuz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10. Hukuk Genel Kurulunda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda; anayap\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle kat irtifak\u0131n\u0131n kendili\u011finden sona erdi\u011fi, buna ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerin 6306 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksine kabul\u00fcn afet riski alt\u0131ndaki alanlar\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm s\u00fcrecini de uzataca\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan benimsenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 11. H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde esas al\u0131nacak olan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin kat irtifak\u0131 kuruldu\u011fu tarih itibari ile de\u011ferlerini olumlu veya olumsuz etkileyen t\u00fcm unsurlar\u0131n incelenip irdelenmesi i\u00e7in bilirki\u015fi kurulundan yeniden ek rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131, arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesini gerektirecek bir hususun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 12. Bu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n VII. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131 … vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 371. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar … ve … vekilinin kat\u0131lma yolu ile temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u0130stek h\u00e2linde temyiz pe\u015fin har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131ranlara geri verilmesine,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyan\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 373. Maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10.09.2025 tarihinde oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla kesin olarak karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00dczerindeki bina y\u0131k\u0131larak arsa h\u00e2line gelen ta\u015f\u0131nmazda kat malikleri arsa pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda ortak m\u00fclkiyet esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re malik olacaklar\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00e2len dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi ve davan\u0131n konusuz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir. arg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 10.09.2025 tarihli, 2023\/648 E., 2025\/512 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2023\/648 E., 2025\/512 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11545,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukuki-haber"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11571"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11571\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11572,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11571\/revisions\/11572"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
SAYISI : 2022\/3641 E., 2022\/3736 K.
\u00d6ZEL DA\u0130RE KARARI : Yarg\u0131tay 5. Hukuk Dairesinin 17.01.2022 tarihli ve
2021\/13839 Esas, 2022\/141 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 BOZMA karar\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Karar\u0131n bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar … ve … vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, davan\u0131n konusuz kalmas\u0131 nedeniyle esas hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
”…Dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelerin incelenmesinde dava tarihi itibariyle kat irtifak\u0131 kurulu ana ta\u015f\u0131nmazda arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemi ile dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ilk derece mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra istinaf incelemesi a\u015famas\u0131nda dava konusu ana ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bunun \u00fczerine ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesinin yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc kald\u0131rarak davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Her ne kadar ilgili B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle hakk\u0131nda yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f ise de dava konusu ana ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak taraf iradeleri ile yeniden arsa paylar\u0131 belirlenmek sureti ile kat irtifak\u0131 ya da kat m\u00fclkiyeti tesis edilmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile bu durumda halen davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu kabul edilerek, arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde esas al\u0131nacak olan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin kat irtifak\u0131 kuruldu\u011fu tarih itibari ile de\u011ferlerini olumlu veya olumsuz etkileyen t\u00fcm unsurlar\u0131n incelenip irdelenmesi i\u00e7in bilirki\u015fi kurulundan yeniden ek rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131, arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesini gerektirecek bir hususun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde karar verilmemesi bu nedenle do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir…” gerek\u00e7esiyle karar bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(De\u011fi\u015fik ikinci f\u0131kra: 14\/11\/2007-5711\/1 md.) Kat m\u00fclkiyeti ve kat irtifak\u0131, bu m\u00fclkiyete konu olan anagayrimenkul\u00fcn ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinden her birinin konum ve b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fcklerine g\u00f6re hesaplanan de\u011ferleri ile oranl\u0131 olarak projesinde tahsis edilen arsa pay\u0131n\u0131n ortak m\u00fclkiyet esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesi suretiyle kurulur. Arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin paylar\u0131 ile oranl\u0131 olarak tahsis edilmedi\u011fi hallerde, her kat maliki veya kat irtifak\u0131 sahibi, arsa paylar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in mahkemeye ba\u015fvurabilir. Ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerden her birine bu f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca tahsis edilen arsa pay\u0131, o b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin de\u011ferinde sonradan meydana gelen \u00e7o\u011falma veya azalma sebebiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez. 44 \u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fckm\u00fc sakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n