{"id":11490,"date":"2026-06-29T13:10:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T13:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/29\/danistay-iddknun-2021-1828-e-2021-1630-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T13:10:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T13:10:00","slug":"danistay-iddknun-2021-1828-e-2021-1630-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/29\/danistay-iddknun-2021-1828-e-2021-1630-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130DDK’nun 2021\/1828 E., 2021\/1630 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

T.C.
\nD A N I \u015e T A Y
\n\u0130DAR\u0130 DAVA DA\u0130RELER\u0130 KURULU
\nEsas No : 2021\/1828
\nKarar No : 2021\/1630<\/strong><\/p>\n

TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVALI) : \u2026 \u00dcniversitesi Rekt\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVACI) : …
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

\u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n

YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130 :<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dava konusu istem: … \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesinde profes\u00f6r olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7imlerinde aday olmak amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddine ili\u015fkin … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin iptali istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla;
\nAnayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesi ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kanunu’nun 36. maddesine 08\/08\/2011 tarih ve 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi ile eklenen h\u00fck\u00fcm belirtilerek;<\/p>\n

An\u0131lan 40. madde ile ayn\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin muhtelif maddelerinin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada; Anayasa Mahkemesince, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, Yetki Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptallerine karar verildi\u011fi, Anayasa’n\u0131n 158. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 66. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince bu maddelere ili\u015fkin iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, karar\u0131n Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak alt\u0131 ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesine karar verildi\u011fi;<\/p>\n

Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinde yer verilen, Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmeyece\u011fi kural\u0131n\u0131n, iptal edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan haklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu, Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu bilinen h\u00fck\u00fcmler dikkate al\u0131narak g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan davalar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmelerinin, Anayasan\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve hukuk devleti ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131;<\/p>\n

Bu durumda, Anayasa Mahkemesince hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanm\u0131\u015f olan 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesine dayan\u0131larak tesis edilen i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131;<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesinin i\u015flemin tesis edildi\u011fi tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de; iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki bo\u015flu\u011fun doldurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giri\u015f tarihinin ertelenmesinin, an\u0131lan maddenin Anayasa Mahkemesi yarg\u0131sal denetiminden ge\u00e7erek hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fini de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 idarenin bu iddias\u0131na itibar edilmesine de olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: Dan\u0131\u015ftay Sekizinci Dairesinin 09\/04\/2019 tarih ve E:2013\/6775, K:2019\/2827 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla;
\nAnayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesinde yer alan erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n sadece kanun koyucu i\u00e7in de\u011fil, idareler ve di\u011fer ki\u015filer i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli bir oldu\u011fu; e\u011fer aksi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olsayd\u0131, bunun an\u0131lan Anayasa h\u00fckm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmesi gerekti\u011fi; nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesinin iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc erteledi\u011fi bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda, erteleme gerek\u00e7esi olarak, iptal nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015flu\u011fun kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edici nitelikte olmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesinin de erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n sadece kanun koyucu i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 destekledi\u011fi;<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesinin bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle iptaline karar verip, an\u0131lan iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc erteledi\u011finde, bu d\u00fczenlemeye dayal\u0131 olarak tesis edilen i\u015flemlerin erteleme nedeniyle do\u011frudan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hale gelmeyece\u011finden, benzer durumlarda ilgili Dan\u0131\u015ftay Dairesi ve mahkemelerce, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde davan\u0131n hangi tarihte a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, ilgili Kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesince ne zaman iptal edildi\u011finin, bu karar\u0131n hangi tarihli Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ertelenip ertelenmedi\u011finin ve bunun s\u00fcresinin, erteleme s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde veya sonras\u0131nda iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri do\u011frultusunda yeni bir d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mutlak suretle dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi;<\/p>\n

2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kanunu’nun 36. maddesine, 08\/08\/2011 tarih ve 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesiyle eklenen f\u0131kran\u0131n yetki kanunu kapsam\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Anayasa Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla iptaline karar verildi\u011fi; an\u0131lan karar 01\/01\/2013 tarihli Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanmakla birlikte iptal karar\u0131 nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015flu\u011fun kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak alt\u0131 ay sonra yani 01\/07\/2013 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinin uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc;<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, dava konusu i\u015fleme dayanak te\u015fkil eden 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesine eklenen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal tarihi olan … ile iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giri\u015f tarihi olan 01\/07\/2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan ve\/veya karara ba\u011flanacak olan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n hukuki denetimine etkisinin a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi;<\/p>\n

Anayasa’n\u0131n 158. maddesi ile 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 66. maddesinde yer alan; Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 mercileri dahil herkesi ba\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kural dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; Anayasa Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla iptal edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarih olan 01\/07\/2013 tarihine kadar y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu ve hukuk aleminde sonu\u00e7 do\u011furdu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131;
\nBu durumda; … \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesinde profes\u00f6r olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n, ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7imlerinde aday olmak amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 13\/12\/2012 tarihli ba\u015fvurusunun, 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi gere\u011fi mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda mesleklerini serbest icra eden \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkan\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddine ili\u015fkin … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 dava konusu i\u015flemin tesis edildi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin … tarihli karar\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmedi\u011finden, an\u0131lan 40. maddeye uygun olarak tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131larak …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolundaki ilk kararda \u0131srar edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

TEMY\u0130Z EDEN\u0130N \u0130DD\u0130ALARI : <\/strong>Daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan, Anayasa Mahkemesince bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptaline karar verilmesinin o h\u00fckme dayan\u0131larak tesis edilen i\u015flemleri do\u011frudan hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hale getirmeyece\u011fi, 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. madesinin iptaline karar verilmi\u015f ise de iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ertelendi\u011fi, dava konusu i\u015flemin de hen\u00fcz iptal karar\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmeden, an\u0131lan 40. madde hukuken ayakta iken tesis edildi\u011fi, bu haliyle dayana\u011f\u0131 \u00fcst hukuk normuna uygun oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI TARAFIN SAVUNMASI : <\/strong>Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, \u0130dare Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n usul ve hukuka uygun bulundu\u011fu ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenlerin, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi savunulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

DANI\u015eTAY TETK\u0130K H\u00c2K\u0130M\u0130 \u2026 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNCES\u0130 : Temyiz isteminin reddi ile …. \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulunca, Tetkik H\u00e2kiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendikten ve dosyadaki belgeler incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

\u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E:
\nMADD\u0130 OLAY :<\/strong><\/p>\n

… \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Kad\u0131n Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 ve Do\u011fum Ana Bilim Dal\u0131nda profes\u00f6r \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131, ayn\u0131 zamanda muayenehane a\u00e7mak suretiyle mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda serbest meslek icra etmektedir.<\/p>\n

06\/04\/2011 tarih ve 6223 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un verdi\u011fi yetkiye dayan\u0131larak, 26\/08\/2011 tarih ve 28037 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin De\u011fi\u015ftirilerek Kabul\u00fc Hakk\u0131nda Kanun ile Baz\u0131 Kanun ve Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamelerde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kanunu’nun 36. maddesine bir f\u0131kra eklenmi\u015f; an\u0131lan f\u0131krada; y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka yerlerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin rekt\u00f6r, dekan, enstit\u00fc, y\u00fcksekokul ve konservatuar m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, b\u00f6l\u00fcm ba\u015fkan\u0131, anabilim ve bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkan\u0131, ba\u015fhekim ve bunlar\u0131n yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Hem iptal davas\u0131 hem itiraz yoluyla 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin an\u0131lan 40. maddesi de dahil olmak \u00fczere muhtelif maddelerinin iptali istenmi\u015f, Anayasa Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla;
\n“…
\n6223 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un kapsam\u0131na giren iki konu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u00e7e\u015fitli kamu kurumlar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan tabip, di\u015f tabibi ve uzman tabip gibi kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin ikinci i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kurallar\u0131n kamu hizmetlerinin bakanl\u0131klar aras\u0131ndaki da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yeniden belirlenmesi ile bir ilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan \u00e7e\u015fitli kamu kurumlar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan tabip, di\u015f tabibi ve uzman tabip gibi kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin ikinci i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kurallar kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda istihdam edilen memurlar, i\u015f\u00e7iler, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli personel ile di\u011fer kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin atanma, nakil, g\u00f6revlendirilme, se\u00e7ilme, terfi, y\u00fckselme, g\u00f6revden al\u0131nma ve emekliye sevk edilme usul ve esaslar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenleme olarak da nitelendirilemez.
\n…” gerek\u00e7esiyle Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 ve 41. maddelerinin Yetki Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve iptallerine karar verilmi\u015f;
\n“…650 say\u0131l\u0131…Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin…40… maddelerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015fluk kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince bu maddelere ili\u015fkin iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak alt\u0131 ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.” gerek\u00e7esiyle de karar\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ertelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, 13\/12\/2012 tarihinde, 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, bu nedenle h\u00fckm\u00fcn herhangi bir ge\u00e7erlili\u011finin kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 17\/12\/2012 tarihinde yap\u0131lacak olan ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7iminde aday olmak istendi\u011fi belirtilerek ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

… \u00dcniversitesi Rekt\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Dekanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemi ile an\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm iptal edilmi\u015f ise de Anayasa Mahkemesine iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ertelendi\u011fi, bu nedenle 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesinin halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulundu\u011fu, buna g\u00f6re mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda mesleklerini icra eden \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkan\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi reddedilmi\u015ftir.
\nBunun \u00fczerine temyizen incelenen dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa Mahkemesinin, yukar\u0131da \u00f6zetine yer verilen … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131, 01\/01\/2013 tarih ve 28515 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 MEVZUAT :<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anayasa’n\u0131n, dava konusu i\u015flem tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan, “Anayasa Mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 153. maddesinde;
\n“…
\nKanun, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkar. Gereken hallerde Anayasa Mahkemesi iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir. Bu tarih, karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.<\/p>\n

\u0130ptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giri\u015finin ertelendi\u011fi durumlarda, T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi, iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki bo\u015flu\u011fu dolduracak kanun tasar\u0131 veya teklifini \u00f6ncelikle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcp karara ba\u011flar.<\/p>\n

\u0130ptal kararlar\u0131 geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmez.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazetede hemen yay\u0131mlan\u0131r ve yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131, idare makamlar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczelki\u015fileri ba\u011flar. ” h\u00fckm\u00fcne,<\/p>\n

6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un, dava konusu i\u015flem tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan, “Mahkeme kararlar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 66. maddesinde ise;<\/p>\n

“(1) Mahkeme kararlar\u0131 kesindir. Mahkeme kararlar\u0131 Devletin yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131, idare makamlar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri ba\u011flar.<\/p>\n

(2) \u0130ptal kararlar\u0131 geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmez.<\/p>\n

(3) Mahkemece iptaline karar verilen kanun, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc veya bunlar\u0131n belirli madde veya h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkar. Mahkeme gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde, Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7memek \u00fczere ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir.<\/p>\n

…” h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Di\u011fer yandan, dava konusu i\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan, 06\/04\/2011 tarih ve 6223 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un verdi\u011fi yetkiye dayan\u0131larak, 26\/08\/2011 tarih ve 28037 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin De\u011fi\u015ftirilerek Kabul\u00fc Hakk\u0131nda Kanun ile Baz\u0131 Kanun ve Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamelerde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kanunu’nun 36. maddesine a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki 6. f\u0131kra eklenmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n

\u201cY\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n kadrolar\u0131nda bulunan \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131, kanunlarda belirtilen h\u00e2ller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanununun 28 inci maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne t\u00e2bidir. Ancak \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyeleri, y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca e\u011fitim ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma faaliyetlerinde bulunmak ve d\u00f6ner sermaye faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda gelir elde edilen hizmetlerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmamak kayd\u0131yla mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka yerlerde meslek\u00ee faaliyette bulunabilir ve meslek veya sanatlar\u0131n\u0131 serbest olarak icra edebilir. Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka yerlerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerine 58 inci madde ile 27\/6\/1989 tarihli ve 375 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin ek 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi uyar\u0131nca ek \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmaz; bunlar rekt\u00f6r, dekan, enstit\u00fc, y\u00fcksekokul ve konservatuar m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, b\u00f6l\u00fcm ba\u015fkan\u0131, anabilim ve bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkan\u0131, ba\u015fhekim ve bunlar\u0131n yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n

An\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesince iptali sonras\u0131nda 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesinin 6. f\u0131kras\u0131, 02\/01\/2014 tarih ve 6514 say\u0131l\u0131 Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Ba\u011fl\u0131 Kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fkilat ve G\u00f6revleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun’un 11. maddesi ile yeniden d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve an\u0131lan f\u0131krada, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyesi olarak istihdam edilmeye ili\u015fkin kurallar getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6514 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 36. maddeye 7. f\u0131kra eklenmi\u015f ve burada tabip, di\u015f tabibi ve t\u0131pta uzmanl\u0131k mevzuat\u0131na g\u00f6re uzman olan \u00f6\u011fretim elemanlar\u0131n\u0131n, kanunlarda belirtilen h\u00e2ller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 28. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne tabi oldu\u011fu, ancak bunlardan profes\u00f6r ve do\u00e7ent kadrosunda olanlar\u0131n, mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6zel hastaneler veya vak\u0131f \u00fcniversitesi hastanelerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f ve bu f\u0131kra kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin 6. f\u0131krada say\u0131lan idari g\u00f6revlerde bulunamayacaklar\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da aktar\u0131lan 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesinin 6 ve 7. f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemi ise Anayasa Mahkemesinin 19\/06\/2015 tarih ve 29391 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 07\/11\/2014 tarih ve E:2014\/61, K:2014\/166 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile reddedilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

HUKUK\u0130 DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; davac\u0131n\u0131n mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda muayenehanesinde serbest meslek icra etti\u011fi, 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesi ile mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda serbest meslek icra eden \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olamayacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yetki Kanunu’na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle Anayasa Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile iptaline karar verildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 idareye ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Mahkemece iptal karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de hen\u00fcz bu karar\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmedi\u011fi, di\u011fer yandan Mahkemenin iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi dikkate al\u0131narak bu kez kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname de\u011fil kanun ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a h\u00fck\u00fcmler eklendi\u011fi, nitekim an\u0131lan Kanun’un 36. maddesine 6514 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile eklenen 7. f\u0131krada; 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 28. maddesine at\u0131fla, muayenehane a\u00e7mak suretiyle serbest meslek icra edilmesinin yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 07\/11\/2014 tarih ve E:2014\/61, K:2014\/166 say\u0131l\u0131 kararla tespit edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
\nAktar\u0131lan bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 itibar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n muhteviyat\u0131, sonu\u00e7 ve etkileri, geriye y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi ve s\u00f6z konusu kararlardan \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 kural d\u00f6neminde tesis edilen i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan ve halen g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan davalar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131ndan ve bu kararlar uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan yeni yasal d\u00fczenlemelerden ne \u015fekilde etkilenece\u011fi hususunun a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesince bir kanunun veya kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamenin t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ya da belirli h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunarak iptal edildi\u011fi bilindi\u011fi halde eldeki davalar\u0131n Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanm\u0131\u015f olan kurallara g\u00f6re g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi, Anayasa’n\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc prensibine ve hukuk devleti ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclemez. Aksine durum ise, Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesinde yer alan Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki h\u00fckme ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Anayasa’n\u0131n 152. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131nda;<\/p>\n

“…Anayasa Mahkemesinin karar\u0131, esas hakk\u0131ndaki karar kesinle\u015finceye kadar gelirse, mahkeme buna uymak zorundad\u0131r.” kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn getirili\u015f amac\u0131 ve ruhu Anayasa Mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n, itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyen ki\u015fi ya da ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, iptal edilen h\u00fck\u00fcm ya da h\u00fck\u00fcmler esas al\u0131narak hakk\u0131nda uygulama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan ve g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan davalarda da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bu hukuksal durumun do\u011fal sonucu olarak, bir kanun ya da kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamenin uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle dava a\u00e7mak durumunda kalan ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluyla Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131na sahip olan ki\u015filerin a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davalarda da; hak veya menfaat ihlaline neden olan kural\u0131n iptal davas\u0131 veya itiraz yoluyla daha \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru sonucunda Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 yaln\u0131zca h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 ile anlam ifade etmemekte olup, gerek\u00e7eleriyle bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7enin bir nevi, mahkemece tespit edilen maddi olgular ile h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131 aras\u0131nda bir k\u00f6pr\u00fc oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir. Bu anlamda iptal ya da y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 yolunda verilen kararlar\u0131n, gerek\u00e7esi ile birlikte dikkate al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Zira, Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131nda da; “B\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r.” denilmek suretiyle bu konuya verilen \u00f6neme dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015ftir. Bu husus, Anayasa Mahkemesince hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeye dayan\u0131larak tesis edilen idari i\u015flemlerin hukuka uygunluk denetimi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da \u00f6nem arz etmektedir.<\/p>\n

Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131nda, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131, idare makamlar\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczelki\u015fileri ba\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda, Anayasa Mahkemesinin karar gerek\u00e7elerinin de, h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131yla bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olu\u015fturmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir. Nitekim, Anayasa Mahkemesi de yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihat haline gelen bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda gerek\u00e7elerinin ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir (\u00d6rne\u011fin; AYM Karar\u0131: E:1988\/11, K:1988\/11, T:24\/05\/1988 ve E:2011\/60, K:2011\/147, T:27\/10\/2011).<\/p>\n

Dava konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00f6zelinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131 idareye ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu tarihte mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda serbest meslek icra eden \u00f6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerinin baz\u0131 idari g\u00f6revlerde bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 650 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 40. maddesinin iptali hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesince iptal karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de; Mahkemenin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, bu yasaklama iradesinin esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir di\u011fer anlat\u0131mla esas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir gerek\u00e7eye yer verilmedi\u011fi, yaln\u0131zca h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yetki Kanunu’na ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptaline karar verildi\u011fi; bu haliyle karar\u0131n esasa de\u011fil \u015fekle ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu; kanun koyucu taraf\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin karar\u0131nda yer alan gerek\u00e7e dikkate al\u0131narak benzer y\u00f6ndeki d\u00fczenlemenin 6514 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklendi\u011fi ve Anayasa Mahkemesince bu kez, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn esas\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011fi ve belli idari g\u00f6revlerden yasaklama iradesinde Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden; gelinen a\u015famada davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen muayenehane faaliyetinde bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle ana bilim dal\u0131 ba\u015fkan\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\nBu itibarla, dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolundaki \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0131srar karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

KARAR SONUCU:<\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n

1. Daval\u0131 idarenin temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fcne;<\/p>\n

2. Dava konusu i\u015flemin yukar\u0131da \u00f6zetlenen gerek\u00e7eyle iptaline ili\u015fkin …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin temyize konu … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

3. Yeniden bir karar verilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n an\u0131lan \u0130dare Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

4. Bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren 15 (onbe\u015f) g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 04\/10\/2021 tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI OY<\/strong><\/p>\n

X- Temyiz edilen kararla ilgili dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinden; …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n, usul ve hukuka uygun bulundu\u011fu, dilek\u00e7ede ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen temyiz nedenlerinin karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, temyiz isteminin reddi ile karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi oyuyla, karara kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” T.C. D A N I \u015e T A Y \u0130DAR\u0130 DAVA DA\u0130RELER\u0130 KURULU Esas No : 2021\/1828 Karar No : 2021\/1630 TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVALI) : \u2026 \u00dcniversitesi Rekt\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc VEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026 KAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVACI) : … VEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u2026 \u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : …. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11491,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11490\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}