{"id":11418,"date":"2026-06-21T07:35:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-21T07:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/21\/yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2023-1363-e-2024-792-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-21T07:35:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-21T07:35:00","slug":"yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2023-1363-e-2024-792-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/21\/yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2023-1363-e-2024-792-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesi’nin 2023\/1363 E., 2024\/792 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n

8. Ceza Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n

2023\/1363 E., 2024\/792 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2023\/268 E., 2023\/353 K.
\nSU\u00c7 : \u0130ftira
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi
\nTEMY\u0130Z EDENLER : San\u0131k m\u00fcdafii, kat\u0131lanlar vekili
\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenlerin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz istemlerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz istemlerinin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 05.04.2017 tarihli iddianamesiyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda her bir kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik iftira su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 25.04.2019 tarihli karar\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n her bir kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik iftira su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 6 ay olarak hapis cezas\u0131 ile ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 25.04.2019 tarihli karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lanlar vekili istinaf itiraz\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f olup \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesinin 19.12.2019 tarihli karar\u0131 ile iftira su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin olarak “…Su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu halinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayn\u0131 kas\u0131t alt\u0131nda ayn\u0131 s\u00f6zlerle birden fazla m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kar\u015f\u0131 iftira etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 43 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi ile uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, Mahkemece su\u00e7un her m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kar\u015f\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fu hatal\u0131 kabul\u00fc ile san\u0131\u011fa fazla ceza verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu…” gerek\u00e7esiyle karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. Bozma sonras\u0131 \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 08.11.2022 tarihli karar\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iftira su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 21 ay 22 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin, 08.11.2022 tarihli karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lanlar vekili istinaf itiraz\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f olup \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesinin 24.02.2023 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcm bentlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131larak yerine, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda iftira su\u00e7undan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 223 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm eklenerek 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 280 inci maddesi birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine, karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz iste\u011fi; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir fiil isnat ederek iftira su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine, bozma \u00f6ncesi ve bozma sonras\u0131 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funa, eksik ve hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n en a\u011f\u0131r bi\u00e7imde cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz istemi; lehlerine vekalet \u00fccreti takdir edilmesi gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dava konusu olay, 16.02.2015 tarihinde g\u00f6revli zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa ait otopark\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi i\u015flemi i\u00e7in i\u015fyerine geldikleri, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n buna engel oldu\u011fu ve daha sonra zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n beton bariyerlerle otopark\u0131n giri\u015fini kapatt\u0131klar\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ise kat\u0131lan g\u00f6revli zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n belediyeye ait ara\u00e7 ile m\u00fch\u00fcr bozma iddias\u0131yla otoparka geldikleri, tekrar beton bariyerleri koymaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, \u015euayip isimli g\u00f6revlinin “g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc yap, biz seni idare edelim, zorda b\u0131rakmay\u0131z, biz toplam 3 ki\u015fiyiz” dedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da kul\u00fcbeden 200 TL para al\u0131p geldi\u011fi, bu paran\u0131n seri numaras\u0131n\u0131 yazarak kaydetti\u011fi, daha sonra polis imdat\u0131 arad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerine polislerin geldi\u011fi, polislerin zab\u0131ta amirini arad\u0131\u011f\u0131, zab\u0131ta amirinin de geldikten sonra arabada arama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, paran\u0131n bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, zab\u0131ta amirinin “paray\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n” dedi\u011finde G\u00f6khan isimli zab\u0131tan\u0131n paray\u0131 cebinden \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisinden zorla para al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda tehdit ve icbar suretiyle irtikap su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131ktan herhangi bir para talep etmedikleri, para almad\u0131klar\u0131, zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerinden araban\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olan cam\u0131ndan bahse konu 200 TL nin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak isnatta bulundu\u011fu, iftira su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

A. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin kabul\u00fc;
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 iftira su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit oldu\u011fu ve zab\u0131ta arac\u0131 i\u00e7erisine para atmak suretiyle maddi eser ve delilleri uydurmak suretiyle iftirada bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n takdiren ve te\u015fdiden cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin kabul\u00fc;
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince; “…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispat edememesi tek ba\u015f\u0131na iftira su\u00e7una v\u00fccut vermeyece\u011finden, yasal unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmayan su\u00e7tan beraati yerine mahkumiyetine karar verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu…” gerek\u00e7esiyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV.GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Dosya kapsam\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalardaki savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlilerinin beyanlar\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, olay\u0131n kollu\u011fa intikal edi\u015f \u015fekli, kolluk taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklar, m\u00fch\u00fcr bozma tutana\u011f\u0131, takipsizlik karar\u0131, kat\u0131lan zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131na disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmesini gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair rapor, idare mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 ve dava dosyas\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iftira kast\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fine dair delillerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen kararda bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015f ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Mahkemenin yarg\u0131lama sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde olu\u015fan inan\u00e7 ve takdirine, incelenen dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz sebeplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

3. Mahkemece, kendisini vekil ile temsil ettiren san\u0131k yarar\u0131na, Hazine aleyhine karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi uyar\u0131nca maktu vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmolunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclen bu hususun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

V. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Kat\u0131lanlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\nGerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Mahkemesinin 24.02.2023 tarihli karar\u0131nda kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n temyiz itiraz\u0131 ve dikkate al\u0131nan sair hususlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n

2. San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\nGerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmeyen bu hususun, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 303 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (h) bendi gere\u011fince d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131na “san\u0131k kendini vekil ile temsil ettirdi\u011finden karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesinin II. K\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n II. B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc gere\u011fince 5.500,00 TL maktu vekalet \u00fccretinin Hazineden al\u0131narak san\u0131\u011fa verilmesine” ibaresinin eklenmesi suretiyle sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve kanuna uygun olan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik temyiz talebinin REDD\u0130 \u0130LE H\u00dcKM\u00dcN D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 304 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u0130stanbul 52. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine, Yarg\u0131tay il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 25.01.2024 tarihinde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesi 2023\/1363 E., 2024\/792 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi SAYISI : 2023\/268 E., 2023\/353 K. SU\u00c7 : \u0130ftira H\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi TEMY\u0130Z EDENLER : San\u0131k m\u00fcdafii, kat\u0131lanlar vekili TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11419,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11418\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}