Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde herkesin me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, 74. maddesinde ise vatanda\u015flar\u0131n ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k esas\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmek kayd\u0131yla T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de ikamet eden yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n kendileriyle veya kamu ile ilgili dilek ve \u015fikayetleri hakk\u0131nda yetkili makamlara ve T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisine yaz\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131na sahip bulundu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. <\/strong>Hak arama ve ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131, ki\u015finin elindeki bilgi ve bulgulara dayanarak yetkili makamlara ba\u015fvurabilmesini kapsamaktad\u0131r. \u0130leri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddian\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu ise ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yap\u0131lacak inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda belirlenir. Ki\u015fi, do\u011frudan g\u00f6zlemledi\u011fi olaylara, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na, belge ve kay\u0131tlara ya da hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ku\u015fkuya neden olan di\u011fer somut bilgilere dayanarak bildiklerini yetkili makama aktarabilir ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyebilir. Ba\u015fvuru sahibinin mevcut bilgi ve olgular\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirmesi, hukuki nitelendirmede yan\u0131lmas\u0131 veya inceleme sonunda iddian\u0131n do\u011frulanamamas\u0131, tek ba\u015f\u0131na iftira su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmayacakt\u0131r. Su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in failin, ma\u011fdurun isnat edilen fiili i\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi halde ma\u011fdur hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ya da idari bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla hareket etti\u011finin belirlenmesi gerekir. Olay\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, delillerin toplanmas\u0131 ve hukuki nitelendirmenin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 adli ve idari makamlara aittir. Yarg\u0131tay, anayasal \u015fikayet hakk\u0131 ile iftira su\u00e7u aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131mda ba\u015fvuruda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen isnad\u0131n sonradan do\u011frulan\u0131p do\u011frulanmamas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda isnad\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi olgular\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi, ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bilgi d\u00fczeyini, isnad\u0131n niteli\u011fini ve failin ma\u011fdurun isnat edilen fiili i\u015flemedi\u011fini bilip bilmedi\u011fini birlikte de\u011ferlendirmektedir.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 03.12.2025 tarihli, 2023\/4907 E., 2025\/9883 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda, <\/strong>san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceden anla\u015fmazl\u0131k ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerden birinin silahl\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunarak kendisini \u00f6ld\u00fcrece\u011fini, di\u011ferinin ise 2.000 kilogram eroinin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ad\u0131na yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu belirterek Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dilek\u00e7eyle ve adliye santralini aramak suretiyle ihbarda bulundu\u011fu, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin isnat edilen su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemediklerinin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine haklar\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin bu su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemediklerini bildi\u011fi halde haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 veya idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiil isnat etmesinin anayasal \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015farak iftira su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu belirtilerek mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 08.10.2025 tarihli, 2024\/19218 E., 2025\/7492 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda,<\/strong> san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceden husumet ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karde\u015fi olan kat\u0131lan\u0131n sahte evrak d\u00fczenleyerek ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u00c7ift\u00e7i Kay\u0131t Sistemi kayd\u0131 \u00fczerinden haks\u0131z kredi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu suretle kamuyu zarara u\u011fratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u015fikayette bulundu\u011fu, soru\u015fturma sonucunda kat\u0131lan\u0131n isnat edilen fiilleri i\u015flemedi\u011finin belirlenerek hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi olayda, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki husumet, \u015fikayet i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan\u0131n bu fiilleri i\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi halde hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 veya idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiil isnat etti\u011fi, eylemin anayasal \u015fikayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalmay\u0131p TCK m.267\/1\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen iftira su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu belirtilerek beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 09.10.2024 tarihli, 2023\/635 E., 2024\/7513 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda, <\/strong>\u015f\u00fcphelinin bo\u015fanma s\u00fcrecinde oldu\u011fu e\u015finin karde\u015fi olan polis memuru \u015fikayet\u00e7inin Diyarbak\u0131r\u2019a tayini \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ili\u015fi\u011fini kesmedi\u011fi, ailesinin devlet i\u015flerini kolayl\u0131kla halletti\u011fi ve bu sebeple kendisi ile aile bireylerinin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olabilecekleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ihbarda bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u015fikayet\u00e7i hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclerek soyut ve genel nitelikteki ihbar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi olayda, isnatlar\u0131n makul \u015f\u00fcpheye, maddi vak\u0131aya ve somut delile dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki bo\u015fanma s\u00fcrecinden kaynaklanan husumet ile mesaj i\u00e7erikleri birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda iftira su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren yeterli \u015f\u00fcphenin bulundu\u011fu ve delillerin mahkemesince de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddi kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 25.01.2024 tarihli, 2023\/1363 E., 2024\/792 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda,<\/strong> otopark\u0131n m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi ve giri\u015finin beton bariyerlerle kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6revli zab\u0131ta memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kendisinden zorla 200 TL istediklerini ileri s\u00fcren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n paran\u0131n seri numaras\u0131n\u0131 kaydettikten sonra polisi arad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yerine gelen zab\u0131ta amirinin talebi \u00fczerine paran\u0131n zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlilerinden birinin cebinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, zab\u0131ta g\u00f6revlilerinin ise paran\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan belediye arac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k cam\u0131ndan i\u00e7eri at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunduklar\u0131 ve haklar\u0131nda tehdit ile icbar suretiyle irtikap su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi olayda, ilk derece mahkemesince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n paray\u0131 zab\u0131ta arac\u0131na atarak maddi eser ve delil uydurmak suretiyle iftira su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015f ise de san\u0131\u011f\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayamamas\u0131n\u0131n tek ba\u015f\u0131na iftira su\u00e7unun olu\u015fmas\u0131na yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraf ve tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, kolluk tutanaklar\u0131, disiplin incelemesi, idare mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 ve olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme bi\u00e7imi birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde paran\u0131n kim taraf\u0131ndan b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lanlara i\u015flemediklerini bildi\u011fi bir fiili isnat etti\u011fi ve iftira kast\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi hususlar\u0131n\u0131n mahkumiyete yeterli kesinlikte belirlenemedi\u011fi belirtilerek beraat h\u00fckm\u00fc, san\u0131k lehine maktu vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi suretiyle d\u00fczeltilerek onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Savunma hakk\u0131, ki\u015finin hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen adli veya idari s\u00fcre\u00e7te olay\u0131n olu\u015funa ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 sunmas\u0131n\u0131, aleyhindeki iddialara cevap vermesini ve lehine olan bilgi ve belgeleri ileri s\u00fcrmesini kapsamaktad\u0131r. Ki\u015finin, hakk\u0131ndaki su\u00e7lamadan veya yapt\u0131r\u0131m tehdidinden kurtulmak amac\u0131yla, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin i\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir fiili o ki\u015fiye y\u00fcklemesi ve bu ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya elveri\u015fli bir isnatta bulunmas\u0131, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015farak T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 267. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilir. Nitekim uygulamada, savunma s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye y\u00f6neltilen isnatlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131klama ile savunma konusu aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flant\u0131 ve isnad\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya elveri\u015flili\u011fi esas al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n V. Failin Bilgisi ve \u0130snat Amac\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Ba\u015fvurunun hukuki niteli\u011fi, dilek\u00e7e, ihbar, \u015fikayet veya ara\u015ft\u0131rma talebi olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan \u00e7ok isnad\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru an\u0131ndaki bilgi ve belgeler, bu bilgi ve belgelerin yetkili makama aktar\u0131l\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imi ile ba\u015fvuru sahibinin amac\u0131 esas al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir. G\u00f6zlemlenen olaylar\u0131n oldu\u011fu gibi aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi hak arama h\u00fcrriyeti kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r. Olay\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesini etkileyecek hususlar\u0131n bilin\u00e7li bi\u00e7imde saklanmas\u0131, isnad\u0131n aksini g\u00f6steren bilgilerin ba\u015fvurudan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n anlam\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi veya mevcut kay\u0131tlar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 aktar\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131, failin isnat an\u0131ndaki bilgisinin ve ma\u011fdur hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma, kovu\u015fturma veya idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flama amac\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruda ihtiyatl\u0131 ifadelerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 da aktar\u0131lan maddi vak\u0131alar, ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bilgisi ve isnatla ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7la birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Failin, ma\u011fdurun isnat edilen fiili i\u015flemedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bilgisinin belirlenmesinde \u00e7o\u011fu kez dolayl\u0131 delillerden ve olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan yararlan\u0131l\u0131r. Bu nedenle tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri, resmi kay\u0131tlar, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fki ve failin olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ek niteli\u011fine ili\u015fkin bilgi d\u00fczeyi birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 02.02.2026 tarihli, 2023\/5150 E., 2026\/1116 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda, <\/strong>san\u0131\u011f\u0131n karakolda ifadesi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan darbedildi\u011fi ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla \u015fikayette bulundu\u011fu, bu iddialar\u0131n karakolda haz\u0131r bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131yla do\u011frulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna ra\u011fmen i\u015flenmedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi fiilleri m\u00fc\u015ftekiye isnat ederek hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu belirtilerek iftira su\u00e7undan verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 23.06.2025 tarihli, 2024\/22294 E., 2025\/5149 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda,<\/strong> infaz kurumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 odada \u00e7\u0131kan kavgaya kar\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde ba\u015fmemur ve iki infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ici odaya g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclerek darbedildi\u011fini, iki infaz koruma memurunun da kap\u0131da bekledi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek be\u015f kamu g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 ihbar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu olayda, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri, doktor raporlar\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek isnatlar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015flemediklerini bildi\u011fi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiilleri ayn\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda birden fazla ki\u015fiye isnat etti\u011fi belirtilerek TCK m.267\/1 ve 43\/2-1 uyar\u0131nca verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesinin 09.09.2024 tarihli, 2024\/244 E., 2024\/6373 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda,<\/strong> san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015firketiyle kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n avukatl\u0131k yapt\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nemde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen davalar ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fikayetler nedeniyle aralar\u0131nda olu\u015fan husumet \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7ede kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n belirli bir zihniyetteki adli makamlar\u0131 organize ederek sahte delillerle lehlerine karar verilmesini sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu kararlar\u0131 veren on bir hakim ve savc\u0131dan yedisinin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensubu olduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle meslekten \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n da \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ihbar \u00fczerine kat\u0131lanlar hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada isnatlar\u0131 destekleyen belge veya ba\u015fka bir delil bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi halde ge\u00e7mi\u015fe dayal\u0131 husumet nedeniyle haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiil isnat etti\u011fi ve ayn\u0131 fiille birden fazla ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 iftira su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi belirtilerek TCK m.267\/1 ve 43\/2 uyar\u0131nca verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n \u0130snat edilen hususun failin g\u00f6rev, yetki veya uzmanl\u0131k alan\u0131na girmesi halinde, ma\u011fdurun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiili i\u015flemedi\u011fini bilme unsuru, s\u0131radan bir ba\u015fvuru sahibine g\u00f6re daha s\u0131k\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilecektir.<\/strong> Mevzuat\u0131 uygulayan, denetleyen veya bu mevzuata g\u00f6re i\u015flem yapan kamu g\u00f6revlisi, idareci ya da meslek mensubunun, g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeleri, yap\u0131lan i\u015flemin hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve mesleki faaliyetin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 bilmesi beklenir. Bu ki\u015filerin g\u00f6revleri gere\u011fi sahip olduklar\u0131 bilgi, deneyim ve eri\u015fim imkan\u0131, isnat konusu fiilin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirebilme d\u00fczeylerinin belirlenmesinde dikkate al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Failin ilgili i\u015flemin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na veya uygulanmas\u0131na kat\u0131lmas\u0131, belge ve kay\u0131tlara eri\u015febilmesi ya da ayn\u0131 alanda mesleki faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctmesi, isnada konu eylemin ger\u00e7ek niteli\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki bilgi d\u00fczeyinin tespitinde \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Failin, isnada konu i\u015flemin hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ger\u00e7ek mahiyetini bildi\u011fi halde maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131 farkl\u0131 bir anlat\u0131mla aktarmas\u0131, eylemi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir fiil olarak ma\u011fdura y\u00fcklemesi ve ma\u011fdur hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma, kovu\u015fturma veya idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yetkili makama ba\u015fvurmas\u0131, T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 267. maddesinde yer alan \u201ci\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi halde\u201d ve \u201csa\u011flamak i\u00e7in\u201d unsurlar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan belirleyicidir.<\/p>\n VI. <\/strong>Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130hbar veya \u015fikayet \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan incelemede isnad\u0131n do\u011frulanmamas\u0131, iftira su\u00e7u bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ancak ba\u015fvuru sahibinin isnat an\u0131ndaki bilgisi ve amac\u0131yla birlikte anlam kazan\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurunun hukuki niteli\u011fi, isnad\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru sahibinin isnat an\u0131nda sahip oldu\u011fu bilgiler, bu bilgilerin yetkili makama aktar\u0131l\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imi ve ba\u015fvuru amac\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek belirlenmelidir. Ki\u015finin elindeki somut bilgilere dayanarak yetkili makamlara ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 ve olay\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemesi, hak arama ve ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r. \u0130ftira su\u00e7unda ise failin, bir kimsenin i\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir fiili, o ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ya da idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla isnat etmesi aranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n Kanaatimizce uygulamada \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereken as\u0131l husus, isnad\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ile failin bu ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru an\u0131nda bilmesi aras\u0131ndaki farkt\u0131r. Failin bilgisi ve amac\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fki, ba\u015fvurudan \u00f6nce sahip oldu\u011fu bilgiler, isnad\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 ve olay\u0131n yetkili makama aktar\u0131l\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imi birlikte incelenerek belirlenmelidir. \u0130hbar ve \u015fikayet hakk\u0131 ile iftira su\u00e7u aras\u0131ndaki s\u0131n\u0131r belirlenirken, yetkili makamlara ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131 ile ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 isnat sebebiyle adli veya idari s\u00fcrece maruz kalan ki\u015finin hukuki g\u00fcvenli\u011fi birlikte g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n \u00d6nceki yaz\u0131m\u0131zda, iftira su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 ile ihbar ve \u015fikayet yoluyla i\u015fleni\u015fini ele ald\u0131k. Bu yaz\u0131da ise \u015fikayet hakk\u0131 ile iftira su\u00e7u aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131m\u0131, hak arama ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bilgisi ve isnat amac\u0131 \u00fczerinden inceleyece\u011fiz. IV. Hak Arama H\u00fcrriyeti ve Savunma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde herkesin me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11411,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11410\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Av.](\"https:\/\/hukukihabernet.teimg.com\/crop\/200x200\/hukukihaber-net\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ozer-alisan-ekren-1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nAv. \u00d6zer Ali\u015fan EKREN<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n
>> \u015eikayet Hakk\u0131 Ne Zaman \u0130ftira Su\u00e7una D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr? – I<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n