{"id":11402,"date":"2026-06-20T12:19:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-20T12:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/20\/yargitay-3-ceza-dairesinin-2022-7769-e-2024-12947-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-20T12:19:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-20T12:19:00","slug":"yargitay-3-ceza-dairesinin-2022-7769-e-2024-12947-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/20\/yargitay-3-ceza-dairesinin-2022-7769-e-2024-12947-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin 2022\/7769 E., 2024\/12947 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3. Ceza Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>2022\/7769 E., 2024\/12947 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2018\/998 E., 2019\/815 K.<br \/>\nSU\u00c7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma<br \/>\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi<br \/>\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p><strong>I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Ankara 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 06.03.2018 tarihli ve 2017\/180 Esas, 2018\/33 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 314 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu\u2019nun 5 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 62 nci maddesi, 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci, ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131, 58 inci maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 63 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi uyar\u0131nca 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesinin, 17.12.2019 tarihli ve 2018\/998 Esas, 2019\/815 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 280 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>3. Dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca tanzim olunan 18.01.2022 tarihli ve onama g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7erir Tebli\u011fname ile Daireye tevdi edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz sebepleri \u00f6zetle;<\/p>\n<p>1. Su\u00e7un maddi ve manevi unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>2. Lehe olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine,<\/p>\n<p>3. Kabule esas al\u0131nan delillerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa,<\/p>\n<p>4. Eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma, inceleme ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011funa,<\/p>\n<p>5. ByLock&#8217;un hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 delil niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funa, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ByLock kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>6.Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen sair temyiz sebepleri ve sair hususlara,<\/p>\n<p>\u0130li\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Temyizin kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n<p>A. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin Kabul\u00fc<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun kabul\u00fc ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin Kabul\u00fc<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince kabul edilen olay ve olgularda, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek istinaf talebinin esastan reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26.09.2017 tarihli ve 2017\/16-956 Esas, 2017\/970 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile onanarak kesinle\u015fen Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 16. Ceza Dairesinin \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi 24.04.2017 tarihli ve 2015\/3 Esas, 2017\/3 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesinin &#8230; ba\u015fvurusuna ili\u015fkin 04.06.2020 tarihli ve 2018\/15231 Ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere; ByLock ileti\u015fim sisteminin FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n kullanmalar\u0131 amac\u0131yla olu\u015fturulan ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran bu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir k\u0131s\u0131m mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lan bir a\u011f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, \u00f6rg\u00fct talimat\u0131 ile bu a\u011fa dahil olundu\u011funun ve gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in haberle\u015fme amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin kanaate ula\u015ft\u0131racak teknik verilerle tespiti halinde ki\u015finin \u00f6rg\u00fctle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan bir delil olaca\u011f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamakla birlikte, savunmas\u0131nda ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildiren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n denetlenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ByLock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131nda ekleyen, eklenen ve irtibatl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ki\u015filer olarak g\u00f6z\u00fcken \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yahut kovu\u015fturma bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak, varsa san\u0131k ile ilgili a\u015fama beyanlar\u0131 dosyaya getirtilip, tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulduktan sonra sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p>UYAP&#8217;ta bulunan \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc su\u00e7lar bilgi havuzunda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131larak sonucunda var ise bu ara\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda elde edilecek t\u00fcm delillerin CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 217 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiine okunmas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu delillere ili\u015fki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131, var ise beyanda bulunan \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n duru\u015fmada tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131, tespit edilen t\u00fcm delillerin karar yerinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 l\u00fczumu,<\/p>\n<p>Kabul ve uygulamaya g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<div data-channel=\"121\" data-advert=\"temedya\" data-rotation=\"120\" class=\"mb-3 text-center\"><\/div>\n<p>Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan verilen cezan\u0131n 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5 inci maddesi ile art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda uygulanan kanun maddesinin ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6rg\u00fct mensubu oldu\u011funa karar verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 58\/9 uncu maddesi uyar\u0131nca tekerr\u00fcr h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeyerek, ayr\u0131ca uygulama maddesi olarak TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 58\/6 nc\u0131 maddesinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>V. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz istemi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesinin, 17.12.2019 tarihli ve 2018\/998 Esas, 2019\/815 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 302 nci maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fname\u2019ye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, oy birli\u011fiyle BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 304 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi uyar\u0131nca Ankara 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine, Yarg\u0131tay il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>31.10.2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-source py-3 small \">\n    <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi 2022\/7769 E., 2024\/12947 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi SAYISI : 2018\/998 E., 2019\/815 K. SU\u00c7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma H\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11403,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11402","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11402\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}