{"id":11400,"date":"2026-06-20T12:26:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-20T12:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/20\/aym-karari-isiginda-bylock-delili-ve-orgutsel-icerik-tespitinin-onemi\/"},"modified":"2026-06-20T12:26:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-20T12:26:00","slug":"aym-karari-isiginda-bylock-delili-ve-orgutsel-icerik-tespitinin-onemi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/20\/aym-karari-isiginda-bylock-delili-ve-orgutsel-icerik-tespitinin-onemi\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM Karar\u0131 I\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u201cByLock\u201d Delili ve \u00d6rg\u00fctsel \u0130\u00e7erik Tespitinin \u00d6nemi"},"content":{"rendered":"

I. Giri\u015f<\/strong><\/p>\n

19.06.2026 tarihli ve 33285 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan<\/a>, Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 24.02.2026 tarihinde verilen R. \u00c7. <\/i>karar\u0131<\/a>nda;<\/strong> ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden mahkum edilen ba\u015fvurucunun mahkumiyetinde, ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ve delil de\u011ferlendirilmesinin yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda;<\/strong> Ergani Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, lise \u00f6\u011fretmeni olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta olan ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda, FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyeli\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphesi ile soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar sonucunda;<\/strong> ba\u015fvurucunun, kendi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 GSM hatt\u0131 \u00fczerinden ByLock program\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na, Bank Asya hesab\u0131 bulunup, bankan\u0131n \u00e7e\u015fitli \u015fubelerinde bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fine, an\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibat\u0131 nedeniyle kapat\u0131lan Aktif E\u011fitimciler Sendikas\u0131na \u00fcye oldu\u011funa ve Sendikan\u0131n Ergani il\u00e7e temsilcisi oldu\u011funa dair tespitlerde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu; <\/strong>Aktif E\u011fitim-Sen \u00fcyeli\u011fini, herhangi bir y\u00f6nlendirme olmadan ve herhangi bir faaliyetine kat\u0131lmadan, yaln\u0131zca memurlar\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 korudu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00fcye oldu\u011fu \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu daha sonra, san\u0131k olarak yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fman\u0131n ilk celsesinde, Sendikan\u0131n Ergani temsilcili\u011fi g\u00f6revini y\u00fcr\u00fctmedi\u011fini de s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bank Asya hesab\u0131n\u0131 ise; faizsiz bankac\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle tercih etti\u011fini, Bankadaki hesab\u0131n\u0131 uzun s\u00fcredir aktif olarak kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlarla birlikte ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile hi\u00e7bir ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede;<\/strong> \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn gizli ileti\u015fim vas\u0131tas\u0131 olarak kabul edilen ByLock program\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tespit ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere, Bank Asya hesap hareketleri, Sendika \u00fcyeli\u011fi ve an\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile meslekten uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu, san\u0131k olarak yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fman\u0131n ilk celsesinde; <\/strong>temsilcilikle ilgili beyan\u0131na ek, ByLock tespiti yap\u0131lan GSM hatt\u0131n\u0131 kendisi kullanmakla, ByLock program\u0131ndan haberdar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu program\u0131 kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Diyarbak\u0131r \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc; <\/strong>\u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olduklar\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen F.D.\u2019nin ve H.Do.\u2019nun farkl\u0131 tarihlerde, kollukta \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131 ile al\u0131nan ifadelerine dair tutanaklarla kendilerine g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraflar \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131r\u0131lan te\u015fhis i\u015flemine dair tutana\u011f\u0131 celse aras\u0131nda Mahkemeye g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Tutanakta;<\/p>\n

Etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanmak isteyen F.D.\u2019nin, ba\u015fvurucuyu \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde \u201cErgani il\u00e7e abisi\u201d olarak bildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanmak isteyen H.Do.\u2019nun ise; ByLock program\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmekle, ba\u015fvurucunun numaras\u0131n\u0131n ByLock\u2019unda ekli oldu\u011funu ve onun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7inde \u201cErgani il\u00e7e abisi\u201d oldu\u011funu ifade etti\u011fi yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ek olarak; <\/strong>F.D. ve H.Do., kendilerine g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraflar aras\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuyu te\u015fhis etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n

Celse aras\u0131nda dosyaya sunulan ByLock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131 ile CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanmak isteyen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n ifade tutanaklar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya okunmu\u015f olup; ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan, ByLock kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131 tekrarla, F.D. ve H.Do.\u2019yu tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu ki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n son celsesinde ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan;<\/strong> H.Do.\u2019nun tan\u0131k olarak ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015fse de, dosyan\u0131n geldi\u011fi a\u015fama gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek bu talep reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvuruya konu yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan Mahkemece, ByLock delili \u00fczerinde durulmakla, delil;<\/strong> \u201c04.03.2016 tarihine kadar ByLock sistemine giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d, \u201csan\u0131\u011fa ait olan ID numaras\u0131n\u0131n ekleyen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa \u2018rmzn2143\u2019, \u2018erganili Ramazan\u2019 \u015feklinde isim verdi\u011fi ve kendi ByLock listelerine bu \u015fekil ekledi\u011fi\u201d, \u201csilahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn kullan\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulmu\u015f ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran bu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmakta olan a\u011f \u00f6zelli\u011fini bilerek, sisteme ancak \u015fifre ile girilebilen d\u00f6nemde bir\u00e7ok kez kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d, \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn haberle\u015fme arac\u0131 olan ByLock program\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yo\u011fun bir \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu\u201d \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca gerek\u00e7ede; alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilirken, \u201csan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yapmakta oldu\u011fu kamu g\u00f6revinin niteli\u011fi\u201d ve \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fctteki konumu\u201d hususlar\u0131na da yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan;<\/strong> ByLock program\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ileti\u015fimi sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan mahkumiyet karar\u0131na dayanak al\u0131nan delillere ve de\u011ferlendirmelere kar\u015f\u0131, davan\u0131n esas\u0131na etkili olarak ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc itirazlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil\/d\u00fcr\u00fcst yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

II. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin De\u011ferlendirmesi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi;<\/strong> mahkumiyetin, CGNAT kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak tutanakta yer alan veri i\u00e7eriklerinin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel nitelikte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, uygulaman\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7i ileti\u015fim amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda tespit edilen di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131slar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. AYM; FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin gizli haberle\u015fme a\u011f\u0131 olarak kabul edilen ByLock\u2019u cep telefonuna y\u00fcklemenin ve kullanman\u0131n, yaln\u0131z ba\u015f\u0131na san\u0131\u011f\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY mensubu olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hele yegane veya belirleyici delil olarak ByLock\u2019un kabul edildi\u011fi davalarda, bu haberle\u015fme program\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetler i\u00e7in kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitinin gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015f ve nitekim derece mahkemeleri ile Yarg\u0131tay da bu y\u00f6nde kararlar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu sabit olmakla birlikte, uygulamay\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ama\u00e7la kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya koyulmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fi \u00fczerinde durulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

\u00d6nceden, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unda mahkumiyet i\u00e7in, program\u0131n kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclse de; <\/strong>Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin Ferhat Kara<\/a> <\/i>ve Adnan \u015een<\/a> <\/i>kararlar\u0131ndan sonra, \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya\/T\u00fcrkiye <\/i>karar\u0131nda, ulusal mahkemelerin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez \u015fekilde ve geni\u015fletici yorum yoluyla ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi i\u00e7in yeterli kabul edildi\u011finin tespit edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Nitekim;<\/strong> Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, ba\u015fvurucunun, ByLock program\u0131n\u0131 yo\u011fun \u015fekilde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015fse de, yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n ve kay\u0131tlarda yer alan di\u011fer i\u00e7eriklerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesinin gereklili\u011fi ortaya koyulmu\u015f olup, aksi kabul ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, belirsizlik halinin devam etti\u011fi, bu durumda da \u015f\u00fcphenin san\u0131k lehine yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kararda da yer verildi\u011fi \u00fczere, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n;<\/strong> A\u0130HM\u2019in Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya\/T\u00fcrkiye <\/i>karar\u0131ndan sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te verdi\u011fi kararlarda, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7eri\u011fi tespit edilemeyen san\u0131klar\u0131n ByLock program\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ileti\u015fim amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00f6rg\u00fct yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na dahil olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilebilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fclen ara\u015ft\u0131rma i\u015flemlerini ilkesel olarak ortaya koydu\u011fu ve yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilkesel tutumu, AYM\u2019ye konu kararda (Kapat\u0131lan) Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin; <\/a><\/strong>25.06.2020 tarihli, 2019\/11650 E. ve 2020\/3039 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda bulunan, \u201cByLock\u2019ta sadece di\u011fer san\u0131k [\u00d6.n\u00fcn] ekli olmas\u0131 ve yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7eriklerinin \u00f6rg\u00fctsel nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen<\/strong> hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u00f6rg\u00fct talimat\u0131 ile bu a\u011fa dahil olundu\u011funu\u0131\u0131 ve gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in haberle\u015fme amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi\u201d<\/i> halinde, verilen mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel nitelik ta\u015f\u0131mayan yaz\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7eri\u011finin hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong> 3. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin; <\/strong>30.09.2024 tarihli, 2022\/3864 E. ve 2024\/11879 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/a>nda yer alan, \u201cByLock ileti\u015fim sisteminin FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n kullanmalar\u0131 amac\u0131yla olu\u015fturulan ve m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran bu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir k\u0131s\u0131m mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lan bir a\u011f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, \u00f6rg\u00fct talimat\u0131 ile bu a\u011fa dahil olundu\u011funun<\/strong> ve gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in haberle\u015fme amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n<\/strong>, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin kanaate ula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lacak teknik verilerle tespiti halinde<\/strong> ki\u015finin \u00f6rg\u00fctle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan bir delil olaca\u011f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamakla birlikte\u201d <\/i>denilerek, ki\u015finin ByLock\u2019u kullan\u0131m amac\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi durumda, etkili bir delil mahiyeti ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 Dairenin; <\/strong>31.10.2024 tarihli, 2022\/7769 E. ve 2024\/12947 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar<\/a> i\u00e7eri\u011finden, \u201cSavunmas\u0131nda ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildiren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n denetlenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ByLock tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme tutana\u011f\u0131nda ekleyen, eklenen ve irtibatl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ki\u015filer olarak g\u00f6z\u00fcken \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yahut kovu\u015fturma bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak<\/strong>, varsa san\u0131k ile ilgili a\u015fama beyanlar\u0131 dosyaya getirtilip, tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulduktan sonra sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi\u201d <\/i>bozma sebebi yap\u0131larak, ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fine \u00f6rnekleri ile yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

G\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme;<\/strong> eksikliklerin istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131nda da giderilmedi\u011finin tespiti ile, Anayasa m.36 ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil\/d\u00fcr\u00fcst yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile verilmi\u015f olup, say\u0131n \u00dcye taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131oyda;<\/strong> 477\u2026 ID numaral\u0131 ByLock hesab\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 GSM \u00fczerinden kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, tespit edilen ilk log tarihinin 09.12.2015 oldu\u011fu, bu ID \u00fczerinden aktif \u015fekilde yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ve aramalar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 zamanda elektronik posta al\u0131n\u0131p g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, tespit edilen di\u011fer ByLock kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya \u201crmzn2143\u201d ve \u201cErganili Ramazan\u201d isimlerinin verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131ktan yararlanan iki \u015fahs\u0131n da ba\u015fvurucuyu te\u015fhis etti\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde \u201cErgani il\u00e7e abisi\u201d olarak bildi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, \u015fah\u0131slardan birisinin ByLock listesinde ba\u015fvurucunun kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n

Delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan derece mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revi oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finden bahisle Yerel Mahkemenin, ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ve di\u011fer deliller ile karar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirerek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurdu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleri ile \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. De\u011ferlendirme;<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kanaatimizce; <\/strong>silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak kabul edilen FET\u00d6\/PDY\u2019nin gizli bir haberle\u015fme vas\u0131tas\u0131 say\u0131lan <\/strong>ByLock\u2019un yaln\u0131zca cep telefonuna indirilmesi hususunun tek ba\u015f\u0131na \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi i\u00e7in yeterli delil kabul edilmemesinin, bu durumun somut ve destekleyici ba\u015fka kan\u0131tlarla g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesinin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n uygulamay\u0131 kullan\u0131m amac\u0131n\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131 ile ileti\u015fim kurmak olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyulmas\u0131n\u0131n, yani uygulaman\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetler kapsam\u0131nda kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinin gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan; ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n, kural olarak \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ileti\u015fime \u00f6zg\u00fc bir veri olmas\u0131 kabul\u00fc ile birlikte, bunun do\u011frudan \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi sonucuna yol a\u00e7mayaca\u011f\u0131, yani \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubiyeti i\u00e7in kimlik kart\u0131 say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu delile y\u00f6nelik esasl\u0131 itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 halinde adil\/d\u00fcr\u00fcst yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilece\u011fi[1],<\/a><\/p>\n

ByLock\u2019un tek ba\u015f\u0131na\/yegane veya belirleyici delil oldu\u011fu durumlarda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n;<\/strong> uygulamay\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn amac\u0131 ve faaliyeti i\u00e7in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n net olarak belirlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi, aksi halde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, ya esasl\u0131 hatadan dolay\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu m.30\/1 gere\u011fince 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu m.223\/3-d\u2019ye g\u00f6re ceza verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r\u201d ilkesinin tatbiki suretiyle CMK m.223\/2-e gere\u011fince beraat karar\u0131 verilmesinin gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Di\u011fer yandan;<\/strong> San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu oldu\u011fu ba\u015fka delillerle tespit edilmi\u015fse, bu durumda ByLock uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n belirleyici delil say\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131, uygulaman\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyeti i\u00e7in telefona y\u00fcklendi\u011finin kabul edilece\u011fi, yan veya tamamlay\u0131c\u0131 delil olarak mahkumiyete dayanak yap\u0131labilece\u011fi[2],<\/a><\/p>\n

Haberle\u015fme program\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct ama\u00e7l\u0131 kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi, bu a\u015famadan sonra g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme i\u00e7eriklerinin tespitinin, o ki\u015finin \u00f6rg\u00fctte yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 konumunu, y\u00f6netici veya \u00fcye olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyaca\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme i\u00e7eriklerinin tespit edilemedi\u011finin ve ba\u015fka delillerle y\u00f6netici oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda ise, ByLock program\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7i haberle\u015fme i\u00e7in kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinden hareketle, failin \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn y\u00f6neticisi de\u011fil, \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131labilece\u011fi[3]<\/a>,<\/p>\n

\u0130zahtan varestedir.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda;<\/strong> hukuk devletinin bir gereklili\u011fi olarak, \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.7, Anayasa m.38 ve TCK m.2 ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131nda bulunan \u201csu\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik\u201d prensibinden, yine \u0130HAS m.6\/2 ile Anayasa m.38\/4\u2019\u00fcn \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc su\u00e7suzluk\/masumiyet karinesinden, hi\u00e7bir durumda uzakla\u015f\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve bu ilkelerinin terk edilemeyece\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Bir fiilin su\u00e7 say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, bir fiilden dolay\u0131 failin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in de, fiilin unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131na denk d\u00fc\u015fmesinin zorunlu oldu\u011fu ve \u0130spat Hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r\u201d ilkesinin esas olup, mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7in hukuka uygun yol ve y\u00f6ntemlerle elde edilmi\u015f somut delillerle maddi hakikate ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi,<\/p>\n

G\u00f6zden uzak tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015een<\/strong><\/p>\n

Stj. Av. D\u00fcndar Can Yorgun<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Bu makale, say\u0131n <\/span>Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015eEN <\/span><\/a>taraf\u0131ndan <\/span>www.hukukihaber.net<\/span><\/a> sitesinde yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kaynak g\u00f6sterilse dahi makalenin tamam\u0131 \u00f6zel izin al\u0131nmadan kullan\u0131lamaz. Ancak al\u0131nt\u0131lanan makalenin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, aktif link verilerek kullan\u0131labilir. Yazar\u0131 ve kayna\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmeden k\u0131smen ya da tamamen yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 \u015fahsi haklara ve fikri haklara ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil eder.)<\/span><\/p>\n

———<\/span><\/p>\n

[1] <\/span><\/a>https:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\/anayasa-mahkemesinin-orgut-uyeligi-sucunda-bylock-deliline-yaklasimi<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[2]<\/span><\/a> <\/span>https:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\/21112023-tarihli-yargitay-karari-isiginda-bylockun-delil-kuvveti<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[3]<\/span><\/a> <\/span>https:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\/bylock<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I. Giri\u015f 19.06.2026 tarihli ve 33285 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan, Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 24.02.2026 tarihinde verilen R. \u00c7. karar\u0131nda; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden mahkum edilen ba\u015fvurucunun mahkumiyetinde, ByLock kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ve delil de\u011ferlendirilmesinin yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi incelenmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda; Ergani Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, lise \u00f6\u011fretmeni olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta olan ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11401,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}