{"id":11383,"date":"2026-06-19T11:57:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T11:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/19\/yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2022-1860-e-2024-4419-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-19T11:57:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T11:57:00","slug":"yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2022-1860-e-2024-4419-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/19\/yargitay-8-ceza-dairesinin-2022-1860-e-2024-4419-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesi’nin 2022\/1860 E., 2024\/4419 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n

8. Ceza Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n

2022\/1860 E., 2024\/4419 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi
\nSAYISI : 2018\/5450 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f
\nSU\u00c7 : \u0130ftira
\n\u0130NCELEME KONUSU
\nKARAR : Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddi
\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : \u0130lgili karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131<\/p>\n

B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ekmece Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 09.07.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/28083 Soru\u015fturma, 2018\/15900 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile \u015fikayet\u00e7inin iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili iftira su\u00e7undan \u015f\u00fcpheli … hakk\u0131nda verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan itiraza ili\u015fkin Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 5. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011finin 04.09.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/5450 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n kesin olarak verildi\u011fi belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 309 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, 08.04.2022 tarihli ve 2021\/23313 say\u0131l\u0131 evrak\u0131 ile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine istinaden d\u00fczenlenen, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 12.05.2022 tarihli ve KYB-2022\/56007 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebli\u011fnamesi ile dava dosyas\u0131 Daireye g\u00f6nderilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. \u0130STEM<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 12.05.2022 tarihli ve KYB-2022\/56007 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin;<\/p>\n

\u201cDosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, m\u00fc\u015fteki su\u00e7 duyurusu dilek\u00e7esinde, Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanununa t\u00e2bi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan kamu personeli oldu\u011funu, \u015f\u00fcphelinin, \u015fahs\u00ee bir husumetinden dolay\u0131 Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k \u0130leti\u015fim Merkezine g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 08\/01\/2018 tarihli ve 1800048593 say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvurusu ile iftirada bulundu\u011funu iddia ederek \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ekmece Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma neticesinde, soyut iddia d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, \u015f\u00fcphelinin y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir dava a\u00e7maya yeterli kan\u0131t ve emare bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f ise de;<\/p>\n

\u015e\u00fcphelinin Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k \u0130leti\u015fim Merkezine (B\u0130MER) g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 08\/01\/2018 tarihli ve 1800048593 say\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvuru metninde ” … bu \u015fah\u0131s san\u0131r\u0131m pedofilide, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuklarla \u00e7ok fazla ilgilenip temasa ge\u00e7iyor. baz\u0131 esnaf arkada\u015flarda bunun fark\u0131na varm\u0131\u015f … ” ifadelerini kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n hakaret su\u00e7unun yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu,<\/p>\n

5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin “Bir kimseye onur, \u015feref ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 rencide edebilecek nitelikte somut bir fiil veya olgu isnat eden veya s\u00f6vmek suretiyle bir kimsenin onur, \u015feref ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na sald\u0131ran ki\u015fi, \u00fc\u00e7 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar hapis veya adl\u00ee para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Ma\u011fdurun g\u0131yab\u0131nda hakaretin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in fiilin en az \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiyle ihtilat ederek i\u015flenmesi gerekir.” \u015feklindeki,<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 23. Ceza Dairesinin 01\/06\/2016 tarihli ve 2015\/8976 esas, 2016\/7036 say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131nda, ” … San\u0131\u011f\u0131n … kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik \u201c..\u00e7ocuklardan uzak dur, s\u00fcbyanc\u0131 diye ad\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar” .. hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyeti yerine olu\u015fa ve dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olmayan yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f … 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA … ” \u015feklindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda hakaret su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususu g\u00f6zetilmeden itiraz\u0131n bu y\u00f6nden kabul\u00fc yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. \u201d
\n\u015eeklindeki gerek\u00e7eye dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

II. GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun (5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 267 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iftira su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, yetkili makamlara ihbar veya \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunarak i\u015flemedi\u011fini bildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde, hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ya da idar\u00ee bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in bir kimseye hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir fiil isnat edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130nceleme konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, \u015f\u00fcpheli …’in B\u0130MER arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 08.01.2018 tarihli \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinde “…beni tehdit eden bu \u015fah\u0131s san\u0131r\u0131m pedofili de \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuklarla \u00e7ok fazla ilgilenip temasa ge\u00e7iyor. Baz\u0131 esnaf arkada\u015flar da bunun fark\u0131na varm\u0131\u015f. D\u00fcn ak\u015fam e\u015fimi darp etti. E\u015fim Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu…” \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine durumdan haberdar olan m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, \u015f\u00fcpheliden \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, \u015f\u00fcpheli ile m\u00fc\u015fteki Muhammed Akif Bu\u011fday aras\u0131nda husumet bulundu\u011fu, \u015f\u00fcphelinin e\u015fi ile m\u00fc\u015fteki aras\u0131nda soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda iftira su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ise de, \u015f\u00fcpheli taraf\u0131ndan B\u0130MER arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6nderilen \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan “…bu \u015fah\u0131s san\u0131r\u0131m pedofili de \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuklarla \u00e7ok fazla ilgilenip temasa ge\u00e7iyor. Baz\u0131 esnaf arkada\u015flar da bunun fark\u0131na varm\u0131\u015f..” \u015feklindeki ibarelerin iftira su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine reddine karar verilmesi, Kanun\u2019a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

III. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n

2. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 5. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesinin, 04.09.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/5450 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 309 uncu maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi, oy birli\u011fiyle KANUN YARARINA BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 309 uncu maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca gerekli i\u015flemin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 22.05.2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Ceza Dairesi 2022\/1860 E., 2024\/4419 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi SAYISI : 2018\/5450 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f SU\u00c7 : \u0130ftira \u0130NCELEME KONUSU KARAR : Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddi TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : \u0130lgili karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ekmece Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 09.07.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/28083 Soru\u015fturma, 2018\/15900 Karar say\u0131l\u0131…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11384,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11383\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}