{"id":11369,"date":"2026-06-18T11:56:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T11:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/18\/aymnin-2021-1490-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T11:56:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T11:56:00","slug":"aymnin-2021-1490-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/18\/aymnin-2021-1490-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2021\/1490 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

<\/strong>ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>H.K.<\/strong> VE<\/strong> D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130<\/strong> BA\u015eVURUSU <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1490)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Karar Tarihi: 9\/12\/2025<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/strong>B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong> B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00dcyeler<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n

\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n

Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Tu\u011fba YILDIZ<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ba\u015fvurucular<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

H.K. ve di\u011ferleri<\/p>\n

[bkz. ekli listenin (C) s\u00fctunu]<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Vekilleri<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

bkz. ekli tablonun (E) s\u00fctunu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u200b<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Tazminat Komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan h\u00fckmedilen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. Ba\u015fvurucular, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetiyle Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

3. Anayasa Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine (A\u0130HM) Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’la kurulan \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Tazminat Komisyonuna (Tazminat Komisyonu) ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011finden birle\u015ftirilen ba\u015fvurular\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 kabul edilemez bulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

4. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular, makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin hak ettikleri tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n yasal faiziyle \u00f6denmesi istemiyle muhtelif tarihlerde Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Tazminat Komisyonu, de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde verdi\u011fi kararlarda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Tazminat Komisyonu, ba\u015fvuruculara ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 farkl\u0131 miktarlarda tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. Ba\u015fvurucular, karara kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 11. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine (B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucular, itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde komisyonca takdir edilen tazminat tutar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesine yap\u0131lan emsal ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckmedilen tazminat miktar\u0131yla k\u0131yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi, karar gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6denmesine karar verilen tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n konusu, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve \u015fik\u00e2yete konu edilen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcresi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmak suretiyle makul s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirlendi\u011fi ve bu nedenle hakkaniyete ve Anayasa Mahkemesi ile A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

7. Ba\u015fvurucular, nihai h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

8. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/strong><\/p>\n

9. Ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulundu\u011fu belirtilen ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun olduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

10. Ba\u015fvurucular, Anayasa Mahkemesinde bireysel ba\u015fvuru a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin de makul s\u00fcre hesaplamas\u0131na d\u00e2hil edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ve tazminat komisyonunca lehe vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmedi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, ayr\u0131ca komisyonca takdir edilen tazminat tutar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesine yap\u0131lan emsal ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckmedilen tazminat miktar\u0131yla k\u0131yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011funu belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

11. Somut olayda temel mesele, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n taraf olduklar\u0131 davalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede tamamlanmamas\u0131 oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvuruya konu \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 40. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

12. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlali iddias\u0131yla 31\/7\/2018 tarihine kadar Anayasa Mahkemesine yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir kanun yolu olu\u015fturulmu\u015f olup eldeki hukuk ve ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurularda inceleme s\u00f6z konusu kanun yolu olan Tazminat Komisyonu kararlar\u0131 ve bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz\u0131 inceleyen B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir nedeninin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

14. Etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131; anayasal bir hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren herkese hakk\u0131n niteli\u011fine uygun olarak iddialar\u0131n\u0131 inceletebilece\u011fi makul, eri\u015filebilir, ihlalin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini veya s\u00fcrmesini engellemeye ya da sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaya (yeterli giderim sa\u011flama) elveri\u015fli idari ve yarg\u0131sal yollara ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011flanmas\u0131 olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir (Y.T.<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2016\/22418<\/a>, 30\/5\/2019, \u00a7 47; Murat Hali\u00e7 <\/i>[1. B.], B. No: 2017\/24356<\/a>, 8\/7\/2020, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n

15. \u00d6te yandan \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan ve gerekti\u011finde uygun bir telafi y\u00f6ntemi sunan etkili hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131, ilgililere etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n bir gere\u011fidir. Buna g\u00f6re ki\u015filerin ma\u011fduriyetlerinin giderilmesi amac\u0131yla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yarg\u0131 yollar\u0131n\u0131n mevzuatta yer almas\u0131 yaln\u0131z ba\u015f\u0131na yeterli olmay\u0131p bu yolun ayn\u0131 zamanda pratikte de ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 sunmas\u0131 gerekir. S\u00f6z konusu yola ba\u015fvurulabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullar somut olaylara tatbik edilirken dayanak i\u015flem, eylem ya da ihmallerden kaynaklanan savunulabilir nitelikteki iddialar\u0131n bu do\u011frultuda geni\u015f \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesi, ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda ise bu durumun yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7elerle a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekir (\u0130lhan G\u00f6khan <\/i>[2. B.], B. No: 2017\/27957<\/a>, 9\/9\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 47, 49).<\/p>\n

16. Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi tespit edilirken s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihi olarak bir ki\u015fiye su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n yetkili makamlar taraf\u0131ndan bildirildi\u011fi veya isnattan ilk olarak etkilendi\u011fi arama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 gibi birtak\u0131m tedbirlerin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarih olarak ise su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ili\u015fkin nihai karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi; yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam eden davalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise Anayasa Mahkemesinin makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetle ilgili karar\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi tarih esas al\u0131n\u0131r (B.E.<\/i> [2. B.], B. No: 2012\/625<\/a>, 9\/1\/2014, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n

17. Medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerle ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda ise yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcresi tespit edilirken s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihi olarak davan\u0131n ikame edildi\u011fi tarih; s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarih olarak -\u00e7o\u011fu zaman icra a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131 da kapsayacak \u015fekilde- yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erdi\u011fi tarih, yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam eden davalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise Anayasa Mahkemesinin makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetle ilgili karar\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi tarih esas al\u0131n\u0131r (G\u00fcher Ergun ve di\u011ferleri<\/i> [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/13<\/a>, 2\/7\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 50, 52).<\/p>\n

18. Ayr\u0131ca ceza ve medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerle ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresinin makul olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken yarg\u0131laman\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ka\u00e7 dereceli oldu\u011fu, taraflar\u0131n ve ilgili makamlar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki tutumu ve ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki menfaatinin niteli\u011fi gibi hususlar dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r (G\u00fcher Ergun ve di\u011ferleri,<\/i> \u00a7\u00a7 41, 45; B.E.<\/i>, \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n

19. Somut olayda an\u0131lan ilkeler ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ba\u015fvurularda verdi\u011fi kararlar ile davan\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcr\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da taraf oldu\u011fu s\u00f6z konusu cezai ve hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrelerinin makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Nitekim Tazminat Komisyonu da yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresinin makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruya konu mesele, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re belirlenen tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n an\u0131lan ilkeler ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ba\u015fvurularda verdi\u011fi kararlara g\u00f6re giderim sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgilidir.<\/p>\n

20. Somut olayda Tazminat Komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresine ili\u015fkin olarak belirlenen tazminat miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirlenmedi\u011fi, tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011fu, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihad\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Haluk Ercan ve M\u00fcrsel \u00dcnl\u00fc<\/i> [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/6129<\/a>, 17\/6\/2020; Burhan \u00c7i\u00e7ek<\/i> [2. B.], B. No: 2019\/18325<\/a>, 21\/7\/2020).<\/p>\n

21. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fi, taraf say\u0131s\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcresi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlal edilen ba\u015fvurucular i\u00e7in Tazminat Komisyonunca \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ihlalin giderilmesi i\u00e7in ihdas edilen ba\u015fvuru yolu olan Tazminat Komisyonunca h\u00fckmedilen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 suretiyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

23. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden var\u0131lan sonuca ve uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen giderime g\u00f6re di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca incelenmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/strong><\/p>\n

24. Ba\u015fvurucular, ihlalin tespiti ve tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

25. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875<\/a>, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2)<\/i> [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506<\/a>, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3)<\/i> [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949<\/a>, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n

26. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/strong><\/p>\n

A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunan ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda belirtilen ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n

B. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvuruculardan kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinde bulunanlar\u0131n talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n

C. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

D. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n

F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yapmak \u00fczere ekli listenin (H) s\u00fctununda belirtilen mahkemelere G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

G. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

H. Ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda belirtilen har\u00e7 ve (F) s\u00fctununda belirtilen vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin listede g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ba\u015fvuruculara \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

\u0130. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

J. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Tazminat Komisyonu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

K. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 9\/12\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H.K. VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1490) Karar Tarihi: 9\/12\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u200b Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Tu\u011fba YILDIZ Ba\u015fvurucular : H.K. ve di\u011ferleri [bkz. ekli listenin (C) s\u00fctunu] Vekilleri…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11370,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11369\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}