{"id":11318,"date":"2026-06-14T09:02:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-14T09:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/14\/hukuk-genel-kurulunun-2022-137-e-2025-571-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T09:02:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-14T09:02:00","slug":"hukuk-genel-kurulunun-2022-137-e-2025-571-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2026\/06\/14\/hukuk-genel-kurulunun-2022-137-e-2025-571-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 2022\/137 E., 2025\/571 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ceza Genel Kurulu <\/strong><\/p>\n

2022\/137 E., 2025\/571 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/strong><\/p>\n

KARARI VEREN
\nYARGITAY DA\u0130RES\u0130 : 9. Ceza Dairesi
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza
\nSAYISI : 318-408<\/p>\n

I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 103\/1-2, 43\/1, 62, 53… . maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 9 y\u0131l 4 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis; ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 109\/1, 3-f, 109\/5, 43\/1, 62… . maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezalar\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunuklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 18.02.2014 tarih ve 106-26 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 14. Ceza Dairesince 28.11.2016 tarih ve 11074-8095 say\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 30.01.2020 tarih ve 13633 say\u0131 ile; ”…. Fehvas\u0131n\u0131n bir i\u015faret parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giri\u015fine m\u00fcsait oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle ereksiyon h\u00e2lindeki bir erkeklik organ\u0131n\u0131n giri\u015fine m\u00fcsait oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcne imk\u00e2n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdurenin vajinal yoldan cinsel ili\u015fki iddias\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle do\u011frulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcm ifadenin yine bu nedenle kabul edilebilir olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurenin olay \u00f6ncesinde san\u0131\u011fa yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi mektup i\u00e7eriklerine g\u00f6re de san\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 tak\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir ruh h\u00e2li i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu ve ma\u011fdurenin olay\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekline, cinsel istismar\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131na, eylemin cebir veya tehditle i\u015flendi\u011fine dair \u00e7eli\u015fkili anlat\u0131mlarda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finin \u015f\u00fcpheli h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi ve bu \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi,” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 14. Ceza Dairesince 29.09.2020 tarih ve 1499-3533 say\u0131 ile; ”…Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, Dairemizin 28.11.2016 g\u00fcn ve 2016\/11074 Esas, 2016\/8095 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 6352 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 99. maddesiyle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 308. maddesine eklenen iki ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131 gere\u011fince kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla on be\u015f ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ma\u011fdurenin a\u015famalarda de\u011fi\u015fen tutars\u0131z anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, savunma ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ma\u011fdurenin adli t\u0131p raporlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihi itibariyle fehvas\u0131n\u0131n bir i\u015faret parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giri\u015fine m\u00fcsait oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle ereksiyon h\u00e2lindeki bir erkeklik organ\u0131n\u0131n duhul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcne imk\u00e2n bulunmay\u0131p vajinal yoldan cinsel ili\u015fki iddias\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle do\u011frulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdurenin olay \u00f6ncesinde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi mektup i\u00e7eriklerine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 tak\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir ruh hali i\u00e7inde olup ayr\u0131ca olay\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekli, cinsel istismar\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131, eylemin cebir veya tehditle i\u015flendi\u011fi hususlar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkili anlat\u0131mlarda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fine dair cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na yeter, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek beraati yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesi” isabetsizli\u011finden h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ise 29.12.2020 tarih ve 318-408 say\u0131 ile; “…Ma\u011fdurenin babas\u0131n\u0131n, san\u0131k ve ailesinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 mobilya ma\u011fazas\u0131 niteli\u011findeki i\u015f yerinin hemen yak\u0131n\u0131ndaki seyyar tezg\u00e2hta pirin\u00e7 sat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdure … de zaman zaman babas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131na gelerek ona yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k ile k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ma\u011fdurenin bu vesile ile tan\u0131\u015farak arkada\u015fl\u0131k kurduklar\u0131, sonras\u0131nda ma\u011fdureye y\u00fcz\u00fck alarak arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir ileri noktaya g\u00f6t\u00fcrme iradesini g\u00f6steren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ma\u011fdureyi \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fckk\u00e2na \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rarak d\u00fckkan\u0131n alt kat\u0131na indirip burada ma\u011fdure ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fi, bu olaydan iki g\u00fcn sonra, ma\u011fdureyi \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rarak d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n alt kat\u0131nda ayn\u0131 eylemi tekrarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 3 g\u00fcn sonra yine d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n alt kat\u0131nda bu sefer oral yolla eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde geli\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme’nin bozma gerek\u00e7eleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda: ma\u011fdurenin bu olanlar\u0131 \u00f6nce eve geldi\u011finde kendisini k\u00f6t\u00fc durumda g\u00f6ren ve Mahkememizde tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen karde\u015fi …’ya anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, onun da aile ile bu durumu payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, her ne kadar savunma taraf\u0131nca b\u00f6yle bir cinsel ili\u015fki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdurenin san\u0131\u011fa duygusal anlamda yak\u0131nl\u0131k duydu\u011fu belirtilerek mektuplar sunulmu\u015fsa da, dizi 11, 12 de bulunan mektup ve yaz\u0131lar\u0131n da ma\u011fdurenin san\u0131\u011fa a\u015fk belirtir beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, mahkememiz karar\u0131nda da taraflar aras\u0131nda bir duygusal yak\u0131nla\u015fmaya i\u015faret edildi\u011fi , ancak ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocu\u011fun olay tarihinde 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olup, sonuncusu oral olmak \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 kez nitelikli cinsel istismar olay\u0131n\u0131 olay\u0131n s\u0131ca\u011f\u0131nda ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131yla anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, tak\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bir a\u015fk ruh h\u00e2linin bu \u015fekilde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 ve kendisini aile ve sosyal \u00e7evrede zor duruma sokabilecek bir beyan\u0131 iftira silsilesi olarak a\u00e7\u0131klamak i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdur annesinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n k\u0131z\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi y\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de saklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek mahkememize g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, yine Mahkememiz kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn zor veya tehdit gerek\u00e7esini i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi bu ya\u015f gurubunda genellikle aile \u00e7ekincesi nedeniyle bu t\u00fcr beyanlar\u0131n bir ‘savunma’ refleksi i\u00e7inde geli\u015fti\u011fi, ATK 6.\u0130htisas Kurulu raporunda da olay nedeniyle u\u011fran\u0131lan ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bozuklu\u011funun istismara ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fi gibi bu psikiyatrik tablonun ya\u015f fark\u0131 fazla olmayan ma\u011fdur ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hile \u015fiddet veya zorlama olmaks\u0131z\u0131n erken ya\u015fta cinsel deneyim ya\u015famas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olabilece\u011fi gibi olay sonras\u0131 geli\u015fen psikososyal stres ve \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma nedeniyle de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011finin bunlar aras\u0131nda t\u0131bben ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, ma\u011fdurenin jinekolojik muaynesinde, ATK \u015fube raporunda belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde hymen i\u015faret parma\u011f\u0131 duhul\u00fcne m\u00fcsait oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, t\u00fcm bu nedenler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda savunman\u0131n reddi ile, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir s\u00fcre arkada\u015fl\u0131k yaparak duygusal ba\u011f olu\u015fturdu\u011fu olay tarihinde 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olan ma\u011fdurenin birden fazla kez cinsel ama\u00e7la h\u00fcrriyetini k\u0131s\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu kapsamda zincirleme olarak nitelikli cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011fu, ”\u015feklinde gerek\u00e7eyle bozmaya direnerek \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm gibi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 31.07.2021 tarihli ve 44475 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma istekli tebli\u011fnamesiyle dosya 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 307. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 madde uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan \u00d6zel Dairece 08.02.2022 tarih ve 23031-950 say\u0131 ile direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na gelen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

II. UYU\u015eMAZLIK KONUSU<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00d6zel Daire ile Yerel Mahkeme aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n sabit olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin su\u00e7 tarihinde on d\u00f6rt ya\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, anne, baba ve ikiz karde\u015fi ile \u0130stanbul ilinde ikamet etti\u011fi, babas\u0131 seyyar tezg\u00e2hta pirin\u00e7 satan kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin okuldan sonra babas\u0131na yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu\u011fu, babas\u0131n\u0131n seyyar tezg\u00e2h\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ise bir mobilya d\u00fckkan\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, su\u00e7 tarihinde on sekiz ya\u015f\u0131nda olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n babas\u0131na ait bu i\u015f yerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

15.12.2010 tarihinde ailesiyle birlikte adli makamlara ba\u015fvuran kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin san\u0131ktan kendisini al\u0131koyarak nitelikli cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n

Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck\u00e7ekmece \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce 16.12.2010 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen raporda; ”…Hymen an\u00fcler vas\u0131fta, fehvas\u0131 i\u015faret parma\u011f\u0131 duhul\u00fcne m\u00fcsait olup eski ve yeni y\u0131rt\u0131\u011fa rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fiili livatan\u0131n maddi delillerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, v\u00fccudunda darp cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ki\u015finin sosyal geli\u015fimi ve e\u011fitim durumu itibar\u0131yla beyan\u0131na itibar edilece\u011fi”,<\/p>\n

Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Ruh Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Sinir Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi Ba\u015ftabipli\u011fince 24.12.2010 tarihli muayene sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen raporda; ”…olay sonras\u0131nda \u00e7ok sinirli oldu\u011fu, karde\u015fleri, anne ve babas\u0131 da dahil olmak \u00fczere herkesi d\u00f6vmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, sinir krizleri ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi, kendine zarar verebildi\u011fi, evden ka\u00e7\u0131p sokaklarda kayboldu\u011fu, korkusu nedeniyle okula gitmek istemedi\u011fi…yap\u0131lan zek\u00e2 testine ve klinik de\u011ferlendirmeye g\u00f6re ‘Hafif Derecede Zeka Gerili\u011fi’ saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, 28.01.2011 tarihli muayenesinde ise ”ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirgin olarak bozuldu\u011fu”,<\/p>\n

Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 6. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulu’nun 31.05.2013 tarihli raporunda ise; ”…ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozacak mahiyet ve derecede olan (Depresif Bozukluk) tespit edildi\u011fi, tespit edilen bu tablonun iddia edildi\u011fi gibi cinsel istismara ba\u011fl\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fi; ancak bu psikiyatrik tablonun ya\u015f fark\u0131 fazla olmayan ma\u011fdur ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hile, \u015fiddet veya zorlama olmaks\u0131z\u0131n erken ya\u015fta cinsel deneyim ya\u015famas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olabilece\u011fi gibi olay sonras\u0131 geli\u015fen psikososyal stres ve \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar nedeniyle de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fi, bunlar aras\u0131nda t\u0131bben ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 oy birli\u011fi ile m\u00fctalaa olunur”, tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdure taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011fa hitaben yaz\u0131lan a\u015fk mektuplar\u0131 ile kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin ba\u015fka \u015fah\u0131slara y\u00f6nelik cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7eren \u00e7ok say\u0131da haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131 evrak\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiince dosyaya sunuldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin vasisi olarak da g\u00f6revlendirilen babas\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 02.10.2017 tarihinde; ”Mahkemenizin 18.02.2014 tarihli karar\u0131 ile mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc verilen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ki \u015fik\u00e2yetimizden (olay tarihinde de k\u0131z\u0131m\u0131n hasta olmas\u0131nda dolay\u0131) vasisi olarak vazge\u00e7iyorum” ifadelerinin yaz\u0131l\u0131 bulundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7enin verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n

Anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdure kollukta; san\u0131kla k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre arkada\u015fl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine y\u00fcz\u00fck ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00fc\u00e7 hafta \u00f6nce kendisini arkada\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 babas\u0131na s\u00f6ylemekle tehdit ederek mobilya d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bodrum kat\u0131na indirdi\u011fini, kap\u0131y\u0131 kilitledi\u011fini, kendisini duda\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6pt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, elbiselerini ve i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartarak cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131 cinsel organ\u0131na soktu\u011funu, olaydan sonra kendisine ”Kimseye anlatma yoksa hayat\u0131n mahvolur” dedi\u011fini, bu olay\u0131 ikiz k\u0131z karde\u015fine anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, iki g\u00fcn sonra yine ayn\u0131 yerde kendisini ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde tehdit ederek zorla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fini, bu ili\u015fki sonucu i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131na kan geldi\u011fini, i\u00e7 \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r\u0131 kimseye g\u00f6stermeden \u00e7ama\u015f\u0131r makinesinde y\u0131kad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir hafta \u00f6nce ekmek almaya gitti\u011finde san\u0131kla yolda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisini yan\u0131na \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayn\u0131 bodrum kat\u0131na indiklerini, bu kez cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131 a\u011fz\u0131na soktu\u011funu, bu olay\u0131 da karde\u015fine anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ailesinin haberinin de oldu\u011funu, san\u0131ktan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu, mahkemede; san\u0131kla i\u015f yerinde tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ”…benimle birlikte bodruma gel, gelmezsen seni babana s\u00f6ylerim, gitmezsen ailene zarar veririm” dedi\u011fini, korktu\u011funu, sa\u00e7\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 yoldu\u011funu, kendisine tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fini, kendisine y\u00fcz\u00fck vermek istedi\u011fini ama almak istemedi\u011fini, \u0131srar edince ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n amcas\u0131n\u0131n kendisine ”… seni istemiyor, seni sevmiyor” diye mektup yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise y\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kendisinin almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, amcas\u0131n\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bundan haberi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, amcas\u0131n\u0131n ismini de … olarak bildi\u011fini, dosyaya sunulan a\u015fk mektuplar\u0131n\u0131 tecav\u00fcz olaylar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce kendisinin san\u0131\u011fa yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan … yarg\u0131lamada; kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin annesi oldu\u011funu, olay\u0131 ikiz karde\u015fine s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, e\u015finin olay\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenince kriz ge\u00e7irip hastaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin psikolojisinin bozuldu\u011funu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureyle y\u00fcz\u00fck ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve y\u00fcz\u00fck ile kand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ma\u011fazada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n hepsinin olaydan haberi oldu\u011funu, san\u0131ktan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu,<\/p>\n

Tan\u0131k … kollukta; kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin, babas\u0131na pirin\u00e7 tezg\u00e2h\u0131nda zaman zaman yard\u0131m etti\u011fini, bir g\u00fcn buradan eve geldi\u011finde el ve aya\u011f\u0131n\u0131n titredi\u011fini, kendisine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mobilya d\u00fckkan\u0131nda tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fini anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015finin kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureyi tehdit etti\u011fini, bu durumu ablas\u0131 …’e anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahkemede; kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin ikiz karde\u015fi oldu\u011funu, kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin olay tarihinde eve geldi\u011finde kendinden ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve korkmu\u015f durumda oldu\u011funu, ba\u015f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7enleri anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini zorla i\u00e7eriye ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin girmek istemedi\u011fini, \u00f6nce birinci kata daha sonra da bodrum kata g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fini ve tehdit etti\u011fini, \u00f6nceki ifadesinin do\u011fru oldu\u011funu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisi biraz daha uyan\u0131k oldu\u011fundan dolay\u0131 kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin safl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,
\nTan\u0131k … yarg\u0131lamada; 2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri san\u0131\u011f\u0131n babas\u0131yla birlikte i\u015fletti\u011fi mobilya ma\u011fazas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f yerinin \u00fc\u00e7 katl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureyi de tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin s\u00fcrekli d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne geldi\u011fini ve mektup b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onu ”senin ya\u015f\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck, b\u00f6yle \u015feyler yapma” diyerek uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ”Babana s\u00f6ylerim” dedi\u011fini, kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin ”Tamam” dedi\u011fini ama yine geldi\u011fini, biraz akli dengesi bozuk gibi hareketler yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fckkanda herhangi bir cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 olay\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, zaten uygun bir yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, on ila on be\u015f g\u00fcn boyunca kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureyi g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, daha sonra polislerin gelerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini,<\/p>\n

Beyan etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k kollukta; \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7inin muhtelif zamanlarda i\u015f yerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan elemanlara kendisine hitaben yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f mektuplar b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 15-20 adet mektup geldi\u011fini, \u00e7ocuk ya\u015fta oldu\u011fundan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 ciddiye almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ilerleyen zamanlarda kar\u015f\u0131dan el kol hareketleri ile kendisini rahats\u0131z etmesi ve elemanlar\u0131 vas\u0131tas\u0131yla mektup g\u00f6ndermeye devam etmesi nedeniyle kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureye bunlara devam etmesi h\u00e2linde durumu babas\u0131na iletece\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin sadece bundan ibaret oldu\u011funu, bundan sonra kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin mektup g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini ve kendisini rahats\u0131z etmedi\u011fini, olay\u0131n bitti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada b\u00f6yle bir su\u00e7lamayla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mektuplar\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funu att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ama elinde kalan iki adet mektubu dosyaya sundu\u011funu, \u015fahs\u0131n ifadesinde belirtti\u011fi olaylar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn yalan oldu\u011funu, besledi\u011fi duygulara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in iftira att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ma\u011fazalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 katl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, her katta personel bulundu\u011funu ve m\u00fc\u015fteri sirk\u00fclasyonu oldu\u011funu, bodrum ya da depo olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, savc\u0131l\u0131kta; kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin bir aydan beri kendisine ilgi duydu\u011funu, ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck oldu\u011fundan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermedi\u011fini, mektuplar g\u00f6ndermeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ”Babana s\u00f6ylerim” dedi\u011fini, \u00e7o\u011funu y\u0131rtt\u0131\u011f\u0131 mektuplar\u0131n iki tanesini k\u0131z karde\u015finin bulup getirdi\u011fini, bunlar\u0131 dosyaya sundu\u011funu, mahkemede; kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin kendisine mektup yazmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yanlar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan elemanlara dahi kendisiyle ilgili mektup verdi\u011fini, mektuplar\u0131n devam\u0131 gelirse ”Babana s\u00f6yleyece\u011fim” dedi\u011fini, onun da ”bir daha mektup yazmam, babama s\u00f6yleme yoksa babam beni \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcr” dedi\u011fini, ondan sonra mektup yazmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, aradan 15-20 g\u00fcn ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, ”Senin ba\u015f\u0131na \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck bela a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131m” dedi\u011fini, iddialar\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini, kendisi ile cinsel ili\u015fki kurmu\u015f olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ma\u011fazan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 katl\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve \u00fc\u00e7 kat\u0131n\u0131n da te\u015fhir salonu oldu\u011funu, her salonda eleman bulundu\u011funu, b\u00f6yle bir\u015fey yapmas\u0131n\u0131n zaten m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 138\/1 ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 217\/1. maddeleri ile Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. ve \u0130HAS\u2019\u0131n 6\/2. maddeleri sarahatine g\u00f6re ispat hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan vicdani kanaat esas\u0131n\u0131 benimseyen Ceza muhakememizin amac\u0131, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi insan onuruna yara\u015f\u0131r bi\u00e7imde ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmakt\u0131r. Ge\u00e7mi\u015fte ya\u015fanan ya da ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia olunan bu vak\u0131ay\u0131\/maddi ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi, olay mahkemesi yapaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenme yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 ile taraflar ve delillerle do\u011frudan muhatap olup muhakeme hukukuna ili\u015fkin normlar do\u011frultusunda, gerekti\u011finde mant\u0131k ilminden ve tecr\u00fcbe kurallar\u0131ndan da faydalanarak sonradan mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde temsil etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015facak, b\u00f6ylece sezgileriyle de\u011fil ak\u0131l yoluyla vicdani kanaate ula\u015farak (Metin Feyzio\u011flu, Ceza Muhakemesinde Vicdani Kanaat, Yetkin Yay\u0131nevi, s. 139) maddi sorunu \u00e7\u00f6zecektir. Bu yetki m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran olay mahkemesine aittir.<\/p>\n

Vicdani kanaate ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, isnat olunan fiilin ispatland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir. Bu nedenle, vicdani kanaat hukuki sorunla de\u011fil, maddi sorunla ilgili bir kavramd\u0131r ve vicdani kanaate ula\u015facak makam da maddi uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zmeye yetkili derece mahkemeleridir. Hukuki sorunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde vicdani kanaat \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc kullan\u0131lamaz. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc; hukuki sorunun do\u011fru \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc, maddi olaya uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru bulunmas\u0131 ve do\u011fru yorumlanmas\u0131 ile ilgilidir.<\/p>\n

Vicdani ispat sisteminde h\u00e2kimler, h\u00fcr vicdanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm verirler. Her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delil arac\u0131, kural olarak kullan\u0131labilir ve bunlar serbest\u00e7e de\u011ferlendirilir. Ancak bu serbestli\u011fin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 yine hukuk belirler. Nitekim, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 138\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re h\u00e2kim, vicdani kanaatini olu\u015ftururken, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n, kanunlar\u0131n ve hukukun \u00e7izdi\u011fi \u00e7er\u00e7evede kalmak zorundad\u0131r. Delil ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ne zaman ve kimler taraf\u0131ndan ikame edilebilece\u011fi, bunlar\u0131n muhakemede tabi tutulacaklar\u0131 i\u015flemler, delil arac\u0131 ikame taleplerinin hangi \u015fartlarda ret olunabilece\u011fi, \u00e7eli\u015fme y\u00f6nteminin nas\u0131l hayata ge\u00e7irilece\u011fi, delil arac\u0131 yasaklar\u0131n\u0131n neler oldu\u011fu gibi konular hukuk taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenir (Feyzio\u011flu, s. 357).<\/p>\n

Kural olarak delillerle do\u011frudan temas kurmayan ve \u00f6\u011frenme yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 yapamayan Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n, hukuka uygun olarak elde edilen delilleri takdir etme ve bu suretle ilk derece mahkemelerinin vicdani kanaatini denetleme, asl\u0131nda olay\u0131n nas\u0131l cereyan etti\u011fini ortaya koyma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esini esas alarak, bu delillerle var\u0131lan sonucun\/kabul edilen maddi vak\u0131an\u0131n, ak\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fctme\/mant\u0131k kurallar\u0131na, genel hayat tecr\u00fcbelerine ve bilimsel kaidelere uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 denetleyebilece\u011finde de ku\u015fku yoktur. 288. maddenin H\u00fck\u00fbmet Tasar\u0131s\u0131’ndaki gerek\u00e7esinde bu duruma; “Delillerin yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirilmesi, kurallar\u0131n yorumunu ve eylemin ger\u00e7ek niteli\u011finin saptanmas\u0131n\u0131 etkiledi\u011finde elbetteki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturur.” denilerek i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir. Uygulama da bu \u015fekilde istikrar kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Doktrinde Yenisey ayn\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi; “Bir hukuk normu olmayan fizik ve mant\u0131k kurallar\u0131 ve tecr\u00fcbe kaidesi, bir hukuk normu gibi ele al\u0131narak bunlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan vicdani kanaatin denetlenmesine imkan sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r.” (Feridun Yenisey, \u0130stinafta Maddi ve Hukuki Mesele Denetimi, Dr. Silvia Tellenbach’a Arma\u011fan, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, s. 1282) diyerek benimsendi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc; sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir hukuki denetimin \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131, maddi vak\u0131an\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun, tam ve do\u011fru olarak belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda kan\u0131t serbestli\u011fi ilkesi ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda toplayabilece\u011fimiz temel prensiplere g\u00f6re; a) Her \u015feyin kan\u0131t olabilece\u011fi (hukuka uygun y\u00f6ntemlerle elde edilmi\u015f), b) \u0130lgililerin kan\u0131t ileri s\u00fcrebilecekleri, c) H\u00e2kimin kendili\u011finden kan\u0131t ara\u015ft\u0131rabilece\u011fi, (hatta zorunlu olarak ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi), d) Kan\u0131t ileri s\u00fcrmede zaman k\u0131s\u0131tlamas\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131, e) Kan\u0131tlama k\u00fclfetinin san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenemeyece\u011fi, f) Kan\u0131t de\u011ferlendirmede h\u00e2kimi ba\u011flayan \u00fcst\u00fcn kan\u0131t\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmay\u0131p h\u00e2kimin t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar\u0131 serbest\u00e7e de\u011ferlendirebilece\u011fi, (vicdani kanaat) ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n temel ilkeleridir. Bu ilkelerin birinden dahi vazge\u00e7mek, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n temel ilke ve yap\u0131s\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmak anlam\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131r (YCGK, 08.04.1991 tarihli ve 81-111 say\u0131l\u0131).<\/p>\n

Amac\u0131, somut olayda maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015farak adeleti sa\u011flamak, su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit olan faili cezaland\u0131rmak, kamu d\u00fczeninin bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek ve bozulan kamu d\u00fczenini yeniden tesis etmek olan ceza muhakemesinin en \u00f6nemli ve evrensel nitelikteki ilkelerinden birisi de doktrin ve uygulamada; su\u00e7suzluk ya da masumiyet karinesi olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan kural\u0131n bir uzant\u0131s\u0131 olan ve Latincede; in dubio pro reo olarak ifade edilen \u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesidir. Bu ilkenin \u00f6z\u00fc, ceza davas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilebilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gereken herhangi bir soruna ili\u015fkin \u015f\u00fcphenin, mutlaka san\u0131k yarar\u0131na de\u011ferlendirilmesidir. Olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f bir uygulama alan\u0131 bulunan bu kural, dava konusu su\u00e7un i\u015flenip i\u015flenmedi\u011fi, i\u015flenmi\u015fse san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenip i\u015flenmedi\u011fi veya ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilme bi\u00e7imi konusunda bir \u015f\u00fcphe belirmesi h\u00e2linde de ge\u00e7erlidir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir su\u00e7tan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesinin temel \u015fart\u0131, su\u00e7un hi\u00e7bir \u015f\u00fcpheye mahal b\u0131rakmayacak kesinlikte ispat edilmesidir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme \u015fekli \u015f\u00fcpheli veya tam olarak ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015f olay ve iddialar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanarak mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulamaz. Ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti; herhangi bir ihtimale de\u011fil, kesin ve a\u00e7\u0131k ispata dayanmal\u0131, bu ispat hi\u00e7bir \u015f\u00fcphe ya da ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc olu\u015fa imk\u00e2n vermemelidir. Toplanan delillerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilip di\u011fer k\u0131sm\u0131 g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek ula\u015f\u0131lan kanaat \u00fczerinden y\u00fcksek de olsa bir ihtimalle san\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezaland\u0131rmak, ceza muhakemesinin en \u00f6nemli amac\u0131 olan ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm vermek anlam\u0131na gelecektir (YCGK, 11.6.2013 tarihli ve 36-294 say\u0131l\u0131).<\/p>\n

\u015eu h\u00e2lde, san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen fiilin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan icra edildi\u011finin kabul\u00fc i\u00e7in gerek\u00e7eli ve muhtemel \u015f\u00fcphenin tamamen yenilmesi gerekir. Zira kabili te’lif olmayan \u015f\u00fcphe ile ger\u00e7e\u011fin yan yana mevcudiyeti ile vicdani kanaate ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n, mant\u0131k ve hukuk kurallar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n

Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdureye y\u00f6nelik farkl\u0131 zamanlarda r\u0131zas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmek ve cinsel organ\u0131n a\u011fz\u0131na somak suretiyle \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi;<\/p>\n

Kabul edilen olayda;<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan kendisine y\u00f6nelik organ sokmak suretiyle cinsel istismar iddias\u0131, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck\u00e7ekmece \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, istismar\u0131n maddi delillerine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 16.12.2010 tarihli raporuyla bertaraf edilmi\u015ftir. San\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya ibraz edilen a\u015fk mektuplar\u0131n\u0131n kendisi taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilk beyanlar\u0131nda bu hususa yer vermeyen kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdure taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdurenin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n soyut su\u00e7 isnad\u0131ndan, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n ise duyumdan ibaret olmas\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011fa t\u00fcm a\u015famalarda m\u00fcsnet eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki istikrarl\u0131 savunmalar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; mahallinde ikame olunan ve tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan delillerin, gerek\u00e7eli\/muhtemel \u015f\u00fcphenin tamamen ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n isnat edilen su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fine dair tam bir vicdani kanaat olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, in dubio pro reo\/\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ilkesi gere\u011fince olu\u015fan \u015f\u00fcphenin san\u0131k lehine de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulundu\u011fu, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel nitelikli istismar\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Bu itibarla, isabetsiz bulunan Yerel Mahkeme direnme karar\u0131na konu mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

V. KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle,<\/p>\n

1-Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 29.12.2020 tarihli ve 318-408 say\u0131l\u0131 direnme karar\u0131na konu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin gerek\u00e7elerinin \u0130SABETL\u0130 OLMADI\u011eINA, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesi isabetsizliklerinden BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

2-Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 10.12.2025 tarihinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n

\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2022\/137 E., 2025\/571 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” KARARI VEREN YARGITAY DA\u0130RES\u0130 : 9. Ceza Dairesi MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza SAYISI : 318-408 I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7 San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 103\/1-2, 43\/1, 62, 53… . maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 9 y\u0131l 4 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis; ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11319,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diger"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11318\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}