Esas No:2020\/32994<\/strong> 2. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/32994 E. , 2021\/1992 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :Ceza Dairesi Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc; II<\/strong>I-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm ile ilgili temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince; T.C.Yarg\u0131tay2. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2020\/32994Karar No:2021\/1992K. Tarihi: 2. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/32994 E. , 2021\/1992 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza DairesiSU\u00c7 : H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, kasten yaralamaH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Temyiz isteminin reddine, beraat Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;Verilen cezan\u0131n miktar\u0131 itibariyle kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin duru\u015fma talebinin CMK‘n\u0131n 299. maddesi gere\u011fince reddine karar verilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;I-Kat\u0131lan san\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[68],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11252"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11252"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11253,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11252\/revisions\/11253"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/1992<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
SU<\/strong>\u00c7 : H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, kasten yaralama
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong> : Temyiz isteminin reddine, beraat<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Verilen cezan\u0131n miktar\u0131 itibariyle kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin duru\u015fma talebinin CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 299. maddesi gere\u011fince reddine karar verilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
I-Kat\u0131lan san\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan temyiz isteminin incelenmesinde;
H\u00fckmolunan cezalar\u0131n miktar ve t\u00fcr\u00fc g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 286\/2-a maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ilk derece mahkemelerinden verilen be\u015f y\u0131l veya daha az hapis cezalar\u0131 ile miktar\u0131 ne olursa olsun adli para cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, kat\u0131lan san\u0131klar … ve … m\u00fcdafiilerinin temyiz isteminin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 298. maddesi uyar\u0131nca istem gibi REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
II<\/strong>-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan kurulan beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;
H\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n miktar ve t\u00fcr\u00fc g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 286\/2-d maddesi uyar\u0131nca, ilk derece mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revine giren ve kanunda \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 iki y\u0131la kadar (iki y\u0131l dahil) hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n gerektiren su\u00e7lar ve bunlara ba\u011fl\u0131 adli para cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n temyizi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz isteminin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 298. maddesi uyar\u0131nca REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130lk derece mahkemesince san\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n istinaf talebi \u00fczerine Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesince davan\u0131n yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine karar verilerek, duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/2-d maddesi uyar\u0131nca beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizi kabil oldu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesinde;
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 288. maddesinin ”Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r.” ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 294. maddesinin ise; ”Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir.” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilerek kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz isteminin, h\u00fckm\u00fcn usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu belirlenerek temyiz sebeplerine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemede;
T\u00fcm dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve gerek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re; istinaf karar\u0131 hukuka uygun bulundu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 302\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, usul ve yasaya uygun olan Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi’nin karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong>\u0130STEM\u0130N\u0130N<\/strong>ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130<\/strong> ile H\u00dcKM\u00dcN<\/strong>ONANMASINA<\/strong>, 09\/02\/2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"