Esas No:2020\/9532<\/strong> 15. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/9532 E. , 2021\/2103 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Zimmet ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcpheliler … ve di\u011ferleri haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma evresi sonunda \u0130stanbul A**** *** Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 13\/11\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2019\/67826 soru\u015fturma, 2019\/112653 say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii \u0130stanbul A**** *** Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 06\/12\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2019\/8581 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine, Y\u00fcksek Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 28\/08\/2020 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 94660652-105-34-8998-<\/strong>2020 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine dayan\u0131larak dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** 16\/09\/2020 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 2020\/76602 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle okundu. T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2020\/9532Karar No:2021\/2103K. Tarihi: 15. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/9532 E. , 2021\/2103 K. Zimmet ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcpheliler … ve di\u011ferleri haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma evresi sonunda \u0130stanbul A**** *** Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 13\/11\/2019 tarihli ve 2019\/67826 soru\u015fturma, 2019\/112653 say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii \u0130stanbul A**** *** Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 06\/12\/2019 tarihli ve…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11244"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11244"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11245,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11244\/revisions\/11245"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/2103<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteyen tebli\u011fnamede;
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 160. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, C**** ***, ihbar veya ba\u015fka bir suretle bir su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi izlenimini veren bir h\u00e2li \u00f6\u011frenir \u00f6\u011frenmez kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7maya yer olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek \u00fczere hemen i\u015fin ger\u00e7e\u011fini ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 170\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince yapaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda, toplanan delillerin su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi hususunda yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda iddianame d\u00fczenleyerek kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131, aksi halde ise an\u0131lan Kanun’un 172. maddesi gere\u011fi kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verece\u011fi, buna kar\u015f\u0131n C**** *** 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un kendisine y\u00fckledi\u011fi soru\u015fturma g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi\u011fi, ortada yasaya uygun bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda, an\u0131lan Kanun’un 173\/3. maddesindeki ko\u015fullar olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, itiraz\u0131 inceleyen merciin C**** *** soru\u015fturma yapmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verebilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,
Somut olayda, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kendisine miras yolu ile kalan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelilerin y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesi olduklar\u0131 S.S. Bolelli \u00c7aml\u0131k Evleri Konut Yap\u0131 Kooperatifine 5 daire verilmesi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda devrinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de an\u0131lan kooperatife \u00fcye oldu\u011fu, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kooperatif taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlardan birinde oturmaya ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra \u015f\u00fcphelilerin usuli sorunlar oldu\u011fundan bahisle m\u00fc\u015ftekiden 115.000,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 para istemeleri \u00fczerine m\u00fc\u015ftekinin makbuz kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda istenilen paray\u0131 da \u015f\u00fcphelilere verdi\u011fi ancak buna ra\u011fmen tapu devrinin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde \u00e7e\u015fitli icra dosyalar\u0131ndan haciz konuldu\u011fu sonras\u0131nda da ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n… isimli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fiye devrinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, devralan ki\u015finin de t\u00fcm bu i\u015flemler hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flem hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2019\/84 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden incelemenin de devam etti\u011finden bahisle \u015fikayet\u00e7i olunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki ihtilaf niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f ise de, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 beyan\u0131 , m\u00fc\u015ftekiden sorularak varsa tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ve beyan\u0131 al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcpheli …’nin de beyan\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p, benzer eylemlerden dolay\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fka soru\u015fturma veya dava dosyalar\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2019\/84 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131n celbi ile onayl\u0131 bir suretinin dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131narak yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerde usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle, sonucuna g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphelilerin hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n tayin ve takdir edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, eksik soru\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 olarak verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.
5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 l\u00fczumu kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine dayan\u0131larak ihbar olunmu\u015ftur.
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc:
M\u00fc\u015ftekinin kendisine miras yolu ile kalan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelilerin y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyesi olduklar\u0131 S.S. Bolelli \u00c7aml\u0131k Evleri Konut Yap\u0131 Kooperatifine 5 daire verilmesi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda devrinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin de an\u0131lan kooperatife \u00fcye oldu\u011fu, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kooperatif taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlardan birinde oturmaya ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra \u015f\u00fcphelilerin usuli sorunlar oldu\u011fundan bahisle m\u00fc\u015ftekiden 115.000,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 para istemeleri \u00fczerine m\u00fc\u015ftekinin makbuz kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda istenilen paray\u0131 da \u015f\u00fcphelilere verdi\u011fi ancak buna ra\u011fmen tapu devrinin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde \u00e7e\u015fitli icra dosyalar\u0131ndan haciz konuldu\u011fu sonras\u0131nda da ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n… isimli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fiye devrinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, devralan ki\u015finin de t\u00fcm bu i\u015flemler hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flem hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2019\/84 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden incelemenin de devam etti\u011finden bahisle \u015fikayet\u00e7i olunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki ihtilaf niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f ise de, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 , m\u00fc\u015ftekiden sorularak varsa tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerinin ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcpheli …’nin de beyan\u0131 tespit edilip , benzer eylemlerden dolay\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fka soru\u015fturma veya dava dosyalar\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2019\/84 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131n celbi ile onayl\u0131 bir suretinin dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphelilerin su\u00e7 i\u015fleme kastlar\u0131na dair hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n tayin ve takdir edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, eksik soru\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 olarak verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar nedeniyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozmaya atfen d\u00fczenlenen ihbarnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin \u0130stanbul A**** *** Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 06\/12\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2019\/8581 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n , 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 309. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcteakip i\u015flemlerin mahallinde merciince yerine getirilmesine, 01\/03\/2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"