Esas No:2020\/689<\/strong> 12. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/689 E. , 2021\/2256 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k …’nun mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan, san\u0131k … ve su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile san\u0131k … ve su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler ise kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay12. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2020\/689Karar No:2021\/2256K. Tarihi: 12. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/689 E. , 2021\/2256 K. Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza MahkemesiSu\u00e7 : Taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kH\u00fck\u00fcm : 1- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u nedeniyle; TCK‘n\u0131n 85\/1, 27\/1-son, 62, 50\/4-1.a, 52\/2-4. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahk\u00fbmiyet2- a- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[73],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11236"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11236"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11237,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11236\/revisions\/11237"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/2256<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Su\u00e7 : Taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k
H\u00fck\u00fcm : 1- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u nedeniyle; TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 85\/1, 27\/1-son, 62, 50\/4-1.a, 52\/2-4. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahk\u00fbmiyet
2- a- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7u nedeniyle; TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 265\/1, 265\/4, 43, 62, 53, 51\/1-3-6-7-8. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet
b- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7u nedeniyle; CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/2-e maddesi gere\u011fince beraat.
3- a-Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk … hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7u nedeniyle; TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 265\/1, 265\/4, 43, 31\/3, 62, 51\/1-3-6-7-8. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet.
b-Su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk … hakk\u0131nda 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7u nedeniyle; CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/2-e maddesi gere\u011fince beraat<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1)Kat\u0131lan … vekilinin, san\u0131k … ve su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile san\u0131k … ve su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan beraatlerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;
\u00d6len …’\u0131n ablas\u0131 kat\u0131lan …’\u0131n san\u0131k … ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davalara kat\u0131lma ve bu su\u00e7lardan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmleri temyize yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, vekilinin bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelen temyiz isteminin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘un 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca isteme uygun olarak REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2-Kat\u0131lan … vekilinin ve san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafiinin, san\u0131k … … hakk\u0131nda taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince ise;
San\u0131k … m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan verilen s\u00fcre tutumlu temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin i\u00e7eri\u011finde temyiz talebinin tamamen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu, her ne kadar karar\u0131n giri\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n “m\u00fc\u015fteki san\u0131k” olarak yaz\u0131lsa da kat\u0131lan s\u0131fat\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir temyiz iradesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde kat\u0131lan s\u0131fat\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden vekalet \u00fccretine y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan CMUK<\/strong>‘un 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin bir nedene dayanmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;
Olay tarihinde saat 02:00 sular\u0131nda asayi\u015f ekibinde g\u00f6revli, aralar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ihbar \u00fczerine aile i\u00e7i kavga olay\u0131na m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7in olay yerine gittikleri, olay yerinin yak\u0131n\u0131ndaki Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131lar Ba\u015f\u0131 mevkiiden 5-6 el silah sesi geldi\u011fi ve hemen ard\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nden beyaz renkli \u015e**** *** bir arac\u0131n gelmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131 su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk …’un kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, sa\u011f \u00f6n koltukta \u00f6len …, arka koltukta ise san\u0131k …’\u0131n oldu\u011fu, polisleri g\u00f6rmeleri \u00fczerine yava\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, polis memurlar\u0131 tan\u0131k … ve san\u0131k …’nun \u015f\u00fcphelenmesi \u00fczerine el i\u015faretiyle ve \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 uyar\u0131yla dur ihtar\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle dur ihtar\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131 san\u0131k ve tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine do\u011fru s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayr\u0131ca ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinden elde edilemeyen bir silahla san\u0131k ve …’ye do\u011fru ate\u015f edildi\u011fi, yine …’\u0131n da havaya do\u011fru ate\u015f etti\u011finin g\u00f6revlilerce beyan edildi\u011fi, bu hususun olay yerinde bulunan ve san\u0131k ile …nin silah\u0131ndan at\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen \u00fc\u00e7 adet kovan bulunmas\u0131 ile de do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ara\u00e7tan at\u0131lan mermilerden birinin ma\u011fdur polis memuru …’nin \u00e7ok yak\u0131n\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, san\u0131k ve tan\u0131k polisin kendilerini yere do\u011fru atarak yara almaktan kurtuldu\u011fu, hattta bu s\u0131rada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n vuruldu\u011funu zannetti\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine …’nin T0624-10C03622<\/strong> nolu MP5 marka A3 makinal\u0131 tabanca ile araca do\u011fru 6 el ate\u015f ederek, ayn\u0131 anda san\u0131k polis memuru ….’in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 T6368-07B11018<\/strong> numaral\u0131 MK<\/strong> Yavuz16 marka yar\u0131 otomatik tabancayla araca do\u011fru iki el ate\u015f ederek arac\u0131 durdurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131k …’in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flardan birinin arac\u0131n arka cam\u0131ndan girerek sa\u011f \u00f6n koltukta bulunan …’a isabet etti\u011fi ve hastanede yap\u0131lan t\u00fcm m\u00fcdahalelere ra\u011fmen kurtar\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6len hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 23\/07\/2012 <\/strong>tarihli otopsi raporuna g\u00f6re “C5-C6 omurlar hizas\u0131nda 1,5X2 cm ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi giri\u015f yaras\u0131 oldu\u011fu, giri\u015f yaras\u0131 alt\u0131na uyan kas dokusunda hematom oldu\u011fu ve bu b\u00f6lgedeki boyun kaslar\u0131n\u0131n kanamal\u0131 oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, C2-C3 omurlarda frakt\u00fcrler oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, C2-C3 omurlar\u0131n tur yard\u0131m\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve omurilik kanal\u0131nda 1 adet ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011finin bulundu\u011fu, ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ate\u015fli silah mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 boyun omur k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131, omurilik yaralanmas\u0131 sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin” bildirildi\u011fi, 05\/10\/2012 <\/strong>tarihli ekspertiz raporuna g\u00f6re \u00f6lenin boyun b\u00f6lgesinden \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan 9 mm \u00e7apl\u0131 Parabellum tipli bir adet mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa zimmetli “T6368-07B11018<\/strong> numaral\u0131, 9 mm \u00e7apl\u0131 Parabellum tipi fi\u015fek atar, MK<\/strong>EK yap\u0131s\u0131, Yavuz 16 marka, Compact model, yar\u0131 otomatik tabancadan at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun” tespit edildi\u011fi, olay mahallinin ilerisinde ana sokak no. 38 say\u0131l\u0131 bina \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan oto \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan olay yeri incelemesi neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen rapor formuna g\u00f6re ara\u00e7 arka cam\u0131 \u00fczerinde, arka bagaj sol far alt\u0131nda ve sa\u011f arka \u00e7amurluk \u00fczerinde birer adet mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fi giri\u015f delikleri bulundu\u011fu, arka bagaj kapa\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131larak bagaj i\u00e7erisi incelendi\u011finde sa\u011f arka \u00e7amurluk \u00fczerinde bir adet mermi \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f deli\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, sol far hizas\u0131 bagaj taban\u0131 \u00fczerinde bir adet mermi \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f deli\u011fi bulundu\u011fu olayda,
\u00d6ncelikle ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 ve ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 ihlalinin ‘kanunun emrini yerine getirme’ sebebiyle hukuka uygun say\u0131labilece\u011fi hallere ili\u015fkin olarak \u00fclkemizde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan hukuki d\u00fczenlemenin irdelenmesi gerekmektedir.
\u00dclkemizin de taraf oldu\u011fu ve Anayasan\u0131n 90. maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u00e7 hukukun bir par\u00e7as\u0131 haline gelen Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ‘Haklar ve \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler’ ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan 2. maddesinde ‘ya\u015fama hakk\u0131’ d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 maddenin ‘b’ bendinde ‘usul\u00fcne uygun olarak yakalamak veya usul\u00fcne uygun olarak tutuklu bulunan bir ki\u015finin ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in kuvvete ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131n kesin zorunluluk haline gelmesi sonucunda \u00f6l\u00fcm meydana gelmi\u015fse ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmi\u015f say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 belirlenmi\u015ftir.
Anayasan\u0131n 17. maddesi 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ‘herkesin ya\u015fama hakk\u0131na’ sahip oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ‘me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa hali, yakalama ve tutuklama kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmesi, bir tutuklu veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, bir ayaklanma veya isyan\u0131n bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, s\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hallerde yetkili merciin verdi\u011fi emirlerin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda silah kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na kanunun cevaz verdi\u011fi zorunlu durumlarda meydana gelen \u00f6ld\u00fcrme fiilleri, birinci f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r.’ denilmek suretiyle birinci f\u0131kradaki hakk\u0131n istisnalar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.
TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 24. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki; “Kanunun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getiren kimseye ceza verilmez” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme ile kanunla verilen g\u00f6revin yerine getirilmesi bir hukuka uygunluk nedeni olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Maddede ge\u00e7en kanun kelimesinden pozitif hukuk metinleri yani yaz\u0131l\u0131 hukuk kurallar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yerine getirilmesinde, belirli konularda ki\u015fiye verilen yetki ayn\u0131 zamanda o ki\u015finin g\u00f6revidir. Bu nedenle s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen hukuka uygunluk nedenini g\u00f6revin ifas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmek gerekir.
2559 say\u0131l\u0131 Vazife ve Selahiyet Kanununun 16. maddesinde, ‘polisin g\u00f6revini yaparken direni\u015fle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, bu direni\u015fi k\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ve k\u0131racak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zor kullanmaya yetkili oldu\u011fu, zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda, direnmenin mahiyetine ve derecesine g\u00f6re ve direnenleri etkisiz hale getirecek \u015fekilde kademeli olarak artan nispette beden\u00ee kuvvet, madd\u00ee g\u00fc\u00e7 ve kanun\u00ee \u015fartlar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde silah kullan\u0131labilece\u011fi, kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, zor kullanmaya ili\u015fkin ko\u015fullara ba\u011fl\u0131 kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun me\u015fru savunmaya ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde savunmada bulunaca\u011f\u0131, me\u015fru savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda, beden\u00ee kuvvet ve madd\u00ee g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanarak etkisiz hale getiremedi\u011fi direni\u015f kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, bu direni\u015fi k\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ve k\u0131racak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde, hakk\u0131nda tutuklama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma, zorla getirme karar\u0131 veya yakalama emri verilmi\u015f olan ki\u015filerin ya da su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde \u015f\u00fcphelinin yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ve sa\u011flayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde, silah kullanmaya yetkili oldu\u011fu, silah kullanmadan \u00f6nce ki\u015fiye duyabilece\u011fi \u015fekilde “dur” \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131nda bulunaca\u011f\u0131, ki\u015finin bu \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ya uymayarak ka\u00e7maya devam etmesi halinde, \u00f6nce uyar\u0131 amac\u0131yla silahla ate\u015f edilebilece\u011fi, buna ra\u011fmen ka\u00e7makta \u0131srar etmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ele ge\u00e7irilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde ise ki\u015finin yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ve sa\u011flayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde silahla ate\u015f edilebilece\u011fi, direni\u015fi k\u0131rmak ya da yakalamak amac\u0131yla zor veya silah kullanma yetkisini kullan\u0131rken, kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 silahla sald\u0131r\u0131ya te\u015febb\u00fcs edilmesi halinde, silahla sald\u0131r\u0131ya te\u015febb\u00fcs eden ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 tehlikesini etkisiz k\u0131lacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde duraksamadan silahla ate\u015f edebilece\u011fi’ d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fimizde;
Polis memuru olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6revi gere\u011fi kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fi ancak bu s\u0131rada kast\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n g\u00f6rev s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleminin taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olma su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaati ile mahkemece mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, \u00f6len ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu araca el feneri kullanmak suretiyle \u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 ve eli ile dur ihtar\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen arac\u0131n \u00fczerine do\u011fru s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ayn\u0131 zamanda ara\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinden iki kez ate\u015f edildi\u011fi, mermilerden birinin tan\u0131k polis memurunun \u00e7ok yak\u0131n\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ti\u011fi ve san\u0131k ile tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendilerini yere att\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ka\u00e7maya devam eden arac\u0131 durdurmak i\u00e7in olay yeri inceleme raporu ile de sabit oldu\u011fu \u00fczere arac\u0131n lastiklerini hedef alarak ate\u015f etti\u011fi ancak arac\u0131n hareket halinde olmas\u0131, vaktin gece olmas\u0131 ve kendilerine y\u00f6nelik ate\u015f edilmesi \u00fczerine kendilerini yere atmalar\u0131 sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hedefi tam olarak ayarlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, silah\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kan \u00fc\u00e7 mermiden bir tanesinin arac\u0131n arka cam\u0131ndan girerek \u00f6lenin boyun b\u00f6lgesine isabet etti\u011fi ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dan yukar\u0131ya do\u011fru seyirle \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu, olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi b\u00f6lgenin ter\u00f6r b\u00f6lgesi olmas\u0131, san\u0131k polis memuru hedef al\u0131narak ara\u00e7tan ate\u015f edilmesi, vaktin gece karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmas\u0131, ara\u00e7 ile ka\u00e7\u0131yor olmalar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tekrar ate\u015f etme imkan\u0131 varken ate\u015f etmemesi ve failleri hedef alarak de\u011fil yere do\u011fru ate\u015f etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 da bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; 2559 say\u0131l\u0131 Polis Vazife ve Selahiyet Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 16. maddesi uyar\u0131nca silah kullanma yetkisi bulunan polis memuru olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fi ve bunu yaparken de hukuka uygunluk nedeninin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, beraatine karar verilmesi yerine hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi,
Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi gere\u011fince halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘un 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca isteme ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, 03\/03\/2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"