Esas No:2017\/32716<\/strong> 15. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/32716 E. , 2021\/2552 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n SU<\/strong>\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, resmi belgede sahtecilik Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar …, …, …’nin beraatine, resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan san\u0131k …’nin beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan; resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar … ve …’\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2017\/32716Karar No:2021\/2552K. Tarihi: 15. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/32716 E. , 2021\/2552 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, resmi belgede sahtecilikH\u00dcK\u00dcM : 1-San\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan CMK‘n\u0131n 223\/2-a maddesi gere\u011fi ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 beraat 2-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan CMK‘n\u0131n 223\/2-e maddesi gere\u011fi beraat3-San\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda TCK‘n\u0131n 204\/1, 43\/1, 62, 53,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11224"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11224"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11225,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11224\/revisions\/11225"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/2552<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong> : 1-San\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/2-a maddesi gere\u011fi ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 beraat 2-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/2-e maddesi gere\u011fi beraat
3-San\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 204\/1, 43\/1, 62, 53, maddeleri gere\u011fi ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 mahkumiyet<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sebze al\u0131m-sat\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili kabz\u0131mal olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131klar … ve …’\u0131n, … \u00c7iftli\u011fi Meyvecilik Tic. A.\u015e. y\u00f6netim kurulu ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan kat\u0131landan \u00e7iftlikteki a\u011fa\u00e7lar \u00fczerindeki meyveler ile tarladaki mahs\u00fcllerin 232.300 TL<\/strong> kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lana bor\u00e7lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k Garanti Bankas\u0131 Ordu \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi Sava\u015f \u015eim\u015fek olan 104929 nolu 30\/12\/2009 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 10.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, Denizbank Bursa Hal \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi … olan B7713392 numaral\u0131 30\/12\/2009 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, Denizbank Bursa Hal \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi … olan B7713393 numaral\u0131 30\/01\/2010 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, Denizbank Bursa Hal \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi … olan B7713394 numaral\u0131 15\/02\/2010 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, Denizbank Bursa Hal \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi … olan B7713395 numaral\u0131 15\/08\/2010 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 200.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, \u00e7ekleri d\u00fczenleyip arkalar\u0131na … … ka\u015fesi vurulup ciro ederek verdikleri, \u00e7eklerden 10.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli \u00e7ekin bankaya ibraz\u0131nda bedelinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi, kat\u0131lana bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00f6demeler yap\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ba\u015fka m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7ekleri verilmesi nedeniyle 30\/12\/2009 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> ve 30\/01\/2010 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> \u00e7eklerin san\u0131klara iade edildi\u011fi, su\u00e7a konu Denizbank Bursa Hal \u015eubesine ait ke\u015fidecisi san\u0131k … olan 15\/02\/2019 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 50.000 TL<\/strong> ve 15\/08\/2010 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli ve 200.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli \u00e7eklerle ilgili kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan …, … ve … aleyhine icra takibi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, takip s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131k …’nin \u00e7ek arkalar\u0131ndaki … … ka\u015fesi \u00fczerindeki imzaya itiraz etti\u011fi, itiraz \u00fczerine Bursa \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan incelemede \u00e7ekler \u00fczerindeki “… … “cirosunun san\u0131k …’ye ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, bu suretle san\u0131klar\u0131n nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledikleri iddia edilen olayda;
1- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan kurulan beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin temyiz incelemesinde;
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine y\u00fcklenen ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 204\/1 maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7unun gerektirdi\u011fi cezan\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na g\u00f6re, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 66\/1-e maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 8 y\u0131ll\u0131k ola\u011fan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 kesen son i\u015flem olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 22\/01\/2013 <\/strong>tarihinden inceleme tarihine kadar dolmu\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, ancak; bu husus yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden ayn\u0131 kanunun 322. maddesinin verdi\u011fi yetkiye dayan\u0131larak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 223\/8. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2-Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar …, … ve … hakk\u0131nda beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ili\u015fkin temyiz incelemesinde;
San\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan beyan\u0131, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, icra dosyalar\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7a konu \u00e7eklerin taraflar aras\u0131ndaki cari hesap ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklanan \u00f6nceden do\u011fan borca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verildi\u011fi ve su\u00e7un yasal unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle verilen beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekilinin, beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve eylemin su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA<\/strong>,
3-Resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar … ve … hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ili\u015fkin temyiz incelemesinde;
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131klar… ve … m\u00fcdafiinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak,
1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 168. ve h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi’nin 13.maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca, mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi halinde, kendisini vekille temsil ettiren kat\u0131lan lehine maktu avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,
Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bu sebepten dolay\u0131 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, fakat, bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131na “Kat\u0131lan\u0131n kendisini vekil ile temsil ettirdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re belirlenen 3.000,00 TL<\/strong> vekalet \u00fccretinin san\u0131klar… ve …’tan e\u015fit olarak al\u0131narak kat\u0131lana verilmesine” f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n eklenmesi suretiyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1.maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK<\/strong>ONANMASINA<\/strong>, 08\/03\/2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"