Esas No:2021\/2814<\/strong> 11. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/2814 E. , 2021\/2581 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 09\/12\/2020 <\/strong>tarih ve 2020\/18190 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine atfen, Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** d\u00fczenlenen 15\/01\/2021 <\/strong>tarih ve KYB<\/strong>-2021\/1910 say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarname ile; T.C.Yarg\u0131tay11. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2021\/2814Karar No:2021\/2581K. Tarihi: 11. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/2814 E. , 2021\/2581 K. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 09\/12\/2020 tarih ve 2020\/18190 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine atfen, Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** d\u00fczenlenen 15\/01\/2021 tarih ve KYB-2021\/1910 say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarname ile;Resmi belgenin d\u00fczenlenmesinde yalan beyan su\u00e7undan san\u0131k …’nun 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 206\/1, 62 ve 52. maddeleri gere\u011fince…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[74],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11222"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11222"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11223,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11222\/revisions\/11223"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/2581<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Resmi belgenin d\u00fczenlenmesinde yalan beyan su\u00e7undan san\u0131k …’nun 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 206\/1, 62 ve 52. maddeleri gere\u011fince 1.500,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair Ankara 21. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 21\/05\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2017\/858 esas, 2019\/649 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n “san\u0131\u011f\u0131n karde\u015fi olan …’nun ihtar edilen, …’\u0131n ihtar eden olarak Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 40. Noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6nderilen ihtarnamenin 02\/05\/2016 <\/strong>tarihinde G\u00fczeltepe Mahallesi …Sokak …. \u00c7ankaya\/Ankara adresine yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n posta memuruna \u015fahs\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek yalan beyanda bulundu\u011fu sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclerek at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan an\u0131lan Mahkemesince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ise de; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda karde\u015finin soy isminin “Bal” oldu\u011funu, kendisinin 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda soy ismini “Cevahiro\u011flu” olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fini ifade etti\u011fi, hakk\u0131nda ihtarname d\u00fczenlenen …’nun ihtarname ve ihtarnamenin tebli\u011f tarihinde ger\u00e7ek isminin … oldu\u011fu, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma dilek\u00e7esine ek sunulan Kahramanmara\u015f 4. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 16\/07\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2019\/140 esas, 2019\/247 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ‘…’ isminin ‘…’ olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, bu haliyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n … ad\u0131na gelen tebligatta tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyan\u0131 ile kasten kamu g\u00f6revlisini yan\u0131ltmaya y\u00f6nelik hareket etti\u011fine dair yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraati yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde mahkumiyetine karar verilmesinde,
Kabule g\u00f6re de,
Mahkemesince, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar verildi\u011finden bahisle, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan verilen cezaya ili\u015fkin olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ise de,
Benzer bir olaya ili\u015fkin Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 08\/07\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2019\/2700 esas, 2019\/12780 karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131nda, “…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sab\u0131kas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ilam\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131, CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 231\/8. maddesine 28.06.2014 <\/strong>tarihli ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 72. maddesiyle “Denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde, ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle bir daha h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilemez.” c\u00fcmlesi eklenmi\u015f ise de, daha \u00f6nce h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin verilen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihleri itibariyle (20\/05\/2014) engel olu\u015fturmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 olumlu bulunarak, takdiri indirim uygulanan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, di\u011fer ko\u015fullar de\u011ferlendirilmeden, daha \u00f6nceden h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131 verildi\u011finden dolay\u0131 kanuni olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi,…” \u015feklinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, adli sicil kayd\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda evvelce verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na dair Ankara 24. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26\/09\/2013 tarihli ve 2012\/1187 esas, 2013\/994 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 09\/12\/2013 tarihinde; \u0130stanbul 18. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesinin 12\/03\/2013 tarihli ve 2011\/3592 esas, 2013\/606 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ise 28\/05\/2013 tarihinde, 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 28\/06\/2014 tarihinden \u00f6nce kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, s\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihleri itibar\u0131yla yeniden h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesine engel te\u015fkil etmeyecekleri cihetle, adl\u00ee sicil kayd\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na engel olacak \u015fekilde ba\u015fkaca kay\u0131t bulunmayan, takdiri indirim de uygulanan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kabul eden ve engel durumu bulunmayan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 hususu tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmadan yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden’ bahisle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, bozulmas\u0131 istenilmi\u015f olmakla,
Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/strong>
\u0130ncelenen dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine atfen d\u00fczenlenen ihbarnamedeki ‘san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fine’ ili\u015fkin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ‘resmi belgenin d\u00fczenlenmesinde yalan beyan’ su\u00e7undan TCK<\/strong>‘nin 206\/1, 62\/1, 52\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1.500,00 TL<\/strong> adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Ankara 21. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 21\/05\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli 2017\/858 Esas ve 2019\/649 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn CMK<\/strong>‘nin 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA<\/strong>; bozma nedenine g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi uyar\u0131nca karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7 kast\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan CMK<\/strong>‘nin 223\/2-c maddesi uyar\u0131nca BERAAT\u0130NE<\/strong>, karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek “kabule g\u00f6re” k\u0131sm\u0131nda belirtilen istem hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na \u0130ADES\u0130NE<\/strong>, 15.03.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"