Esas No:2021\/1296<\/strong> 15. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/1296 E. , 2021\/2943 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :Ceza Dairesi Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesine muhalefet etme su\u00e7undan \u0130stanbul 18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2019\/36 Esas ve 2020\/52 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hakk\u0131nda san\u0131k ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131ndan sonra, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 22. Ceza Dairesi’nin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin san\u0131k, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri ve B\u00f6lge Adliye C**** *** taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2021\/1296Karar No:2021\/2943K. Tarihi: 15. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/1296 E. , 2021\/2943 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza DairesiSU\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a muhalefetH\u00dcK\u00dcM : \u0130stanbul 18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2019\/36 Esas ve 2020\/52 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;1- 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25, TCK‘n\u0131n 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53, 58. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet,2- TCK‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L, 52\/2-4, 53, 58 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11200"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11200"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11200\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11201,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11200\/revisions\/11201"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/2943<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
SU<\/strong>\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a muhalefet
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong> : \u0130stanbul 18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2019\/36 Esas ve 2020\/52 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;
1- 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25, TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53, 58. maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet,
2- TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L, 52\/2-4, 53, 58 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 22. Ceza Dairesi’nin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmleri<\/p>\n\n\n\n
San\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme isteminin, h\u00fckmedilen cezalar\u0131n on y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131ndan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK<\/strong>‘un 318 ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 299. maddeleri gere\u011fince reddine karar verilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 288. maddesinde ”Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r” denilmesi ile ayn\u0131 kanunun 294. maddesinde yer alan ”Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir” h\u00fckm\u00fc ve ayn\u0131 kanunun 301. maddesinde belirtilen ”Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda belirtilen hususlar ile temyiz istemi usule ili\u015fkin noksanlardan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bunu belirten olaylar hakk\u0131nda incelemeler yapar.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeler g\u00f6zetilerek; san\u0131k ve san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiilerinin “at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine h\u00fckmedilen su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, eksik inceleme, tekerr\u00fcr \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, delil niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mayan materyallerin h\u00fck\u00fcmlere esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tahliyesinin gerekti\u011fine’, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi C**** ***n\u0131n ‘yeterli gerek\u00e7e a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcst hadden uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131na, tekerr\u00fcr \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, adli para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n tayinin de \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne’ ili\u015fkin temyiz taleplerinin bulundu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisini Beyin Sinir ve Omirilik Cerrahisi uzman\u0131 Prof.Dr. … olarak tan\u0131tarak A9 ve On4 Tv kanal\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan programlara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Youtube ve buyukantalya.com isimli internet sitelerinde profes\u00f6r \u00fcnvan\u0131 ile konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, google plus \u00fczerinden doktormu\u015f gibi meslekta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n t\u0131p bayram\u0131n\u0131 kutlama i\u00e7erikli mesaj yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisine ait http:\/\/cuneytturan.tumblr.com isimli internet sitesinde ba\u015fka baz\u0131 doktorlara ameliyat \u00f6ncesi \u00e7ekilmi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcnen foto\u011fraf\u0131 Bezmi-i Alem T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi ameliyat \u00f6ncesi hat\u0131ra foto\u011fraf\u0131 notuyla payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, yine ayn\u0131 sitede ayn\u0131 \u015fah\u0131slarla \u00e7ekilmi\u015f ba\u015fka bir foto\u011fraf\u0131 “ameliyat sonras\u0131 ba\u015far\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczlere yans\u0131yan ho\u015f tebess\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn hat\u0131ra foto\u011fraf\u0131” notuyla payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, hastane.com.tr ve hekimce.com.tr isimli sitelerde kendisi hakk\u0131nda beyin sinir cerrah\u0131 olarak tan\u0131t\u0131m yaz\u0131lar\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, yine benzer yaz\u0131 ve resimleri facebook isimli sitedeki sayfas\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n da payla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131,
Bu kapsamda; kat\u0131lan …’nun kanser olan e\u015fi …’nun tedavi s\u00fcrecine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdahil oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6nderilen tahlil sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile tedavi evrak\u0131na bakarak tavsiyeler verip y\u00f6nlendirmelerde bulundu\u011fu, e\u015fi i\u00e7in getirece\u011fi tedavi maksatl\u0131 materyaller i\u00e7in 45.000 Euro ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, beyninde p\u0131ht\u0131la\u015fma olabilece\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphesiyle MR<\/strong> \u00e7ekilen m\u00fc\u015fteki …’nun telefon ile MR<\/strong> sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na bak\u0131p, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015fteki …’nin beyin t\u00fcm\u00f6r\u00fc rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan annesinin tedavi evrak\u0131n\u0131 inceleyerek, t\u00fcm\u00f6r\u00fcn 1.evrede oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, doktorlar\u0131n tavsiye etti\u011finden farkl\u0131 bir ilac\u0131 kendisine verip annesinin kullanmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve 1219 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesine muhalefet etme su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilen olayda;
1- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesine muhalefet su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;
San\u0131k savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan ve m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin beyanlar\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki telefon yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, internet sitelerine ili\u015fkin yaz\u0131lar, kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konferans ve programlara ait videolar, foto\u011fraflar ile dosya kapsam\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda zincirleme \u015fekilde 1219 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25. maddesine muhalefet etme su\u00e7undan ilk derece mahkemesinin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin, san\u0131k, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri ve B\u00f6lge Adliye C**** ***n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fckme ili\u015fkin TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong>\u0130STEMLER\u0130N\u0130N<\/strong>AYRI<\/strong>AYRI<\/strong>ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2- San\u0131\u011f\u0131n nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;
San\u0131k savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan beyanlar\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan ilk derece mahkemesinin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, kat\u0131lanlar vekili, san\u0131k, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri ve B\u00f6lge Adliye C**** ***n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n tekerr\u00fcre esas al\u0131nan 20\/07\/2010 <\/strong>kesinle\u015fme tarihli E**** *** Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2008\/2010 Esas 2010\/415 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ertelemeye ili\u015fkin ilam\u0131n\u0131n TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 51\/8 maddesi uyar\u0131nca infaz edilmi\u015f say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 20.07.2013 <\/strong>tarihinden su\u00e7 tarihlerine kadar, TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 58\/2-b maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen 3 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak, s\u00f6z konusu ilam\u0131n tekerr\u00fcre esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adli sicil kayd\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fkaca tekerr\u00fcre esas sab\u0131kas\u0131 bulunmayan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 58. maddesindeki tekerr\u00fcr h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesi,
Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, san\u0131k, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiileri ve B\u00f6lge Adliye C**** ***n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 22. Ceza Dairesi’nin 14\/09\/2020 <\/strong>tarih ve 2020\/2375 Esas, 2020\/1158 Karar say\u0131l\u0131, vaki istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 302\/2-4. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, ancak bu hususun yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanunun 303. maddesinin verdi\u011fi yetki uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan; h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131ndan tekerr\u00fcre ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n tamamen \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi ve temyiz incelemeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tutukluluk s\u00fcresi nazara al\u0131narak san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiilerinin tahliye talebinin reddiyle, sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK<\/strong>TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong>\u0130STEMLER\u0130N\u0130N<\/strong>AYRI<\/strong>AYRI<\/strong>ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n 28\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 304\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince \u0130stanbul 18. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ne, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 22. Ceza Dairesi’ne g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** TEVD\u0130\u0130NE<\/strong>, 15\/03\/2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"