{"id":11196,"date":"2022-06-28T08:13:21","date_gmt":"2022-06-28T08:13:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=11196"},"modified":"2022-07-20T06:58:24","modified_gmt":"2022-07-20T06:58:24","slug":"yargitay-19-ceza-dairesi-2019-32167-e-2021-2976-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2022\/06\/28\/yargitay-19-ceza-dairesi-2019-32167-e-2021-2976-k\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 19. Ceza Dairesi 2019\/32167 E. 2021\/2976 K."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3>T.C.<br>Yarg\u0131tay<br>19. Ceza Dairesi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Esas No:2019\/32167<\/strong><br><strong>Karar No:2021\/2976<\/strong><br><strong>K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>19. Ceza Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/32167 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/2976 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3213 say\u0131l\u0131 Maden Kanunu&#8217;na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k eyleminden dolay\u0131 kabahatli &#8230; hakk\u0131nda Develi Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n&nbsp;<strong>12\/01\/2017&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli ve 2 say\u0131l\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131 ile uygulanan 144.212,80 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc dair Develi Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin&nbsp;<strong>21\/03\/2017&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli ve 2017\/72 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii Kayseri 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin&nbsp;<strong>29\/05\/2017&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli ve 2017\/2306 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 aleyhine Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n&nbsp;<strong>05\/09\/2019&nbsp;<\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 94660652-1<strong>05-38-9727-<\/strong>2019-Kyb say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemini i\u00e7eren yaz\u0131s\u0131 ekinde bulunan dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay C**** ***&nbsp;<strong>13\/09\/2019&nbsp;<\/strong>g\u00fcn ve&nbsp;<strong>KYB<\/strong>-2019\/87907 say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarnamesi ile dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle okundu.<br>An\u0131lan ihbarnamede;<br>Dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, mahkemesince kabahatlinin maden oca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7indeki madenlerin tamam\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle maden oca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alan\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanarak idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f ise;<br>1- 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesi&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 28. maddesinde yer alan, &#8216; ..(5) Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa, bilirki\u015fi incelemesine ve ke\u015ffe ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, bu ba\u015fvuru ile ilgili olarak da uygulan\u0131r. (6) Dinlemede s\u0131ras\u0131yla; haz\u0131r bulunan ba\u015fvuru sahibi ve avukat\u0131, ilgili kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015funun temsilcisi, varsa tan\u0131klar dinlenir, bilirki\u015fi raporu okunur, di\u011fer deliller ortaya konulur. (7) Mahkeme, ilgilileri dinledikten ve b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri ortaya koyduktan sonra aleyhinde idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 verilen ve haz\u0131r bulunan tarafa son s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc sorar. Son s\u00f6z hakk\u0131, aleyhinde idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 verilen taraf\u0131n kanuni temsilcisi veya avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da kullan\u0131labilir. Mahkeme son karar\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131r bulunan taraflar\u0131n huzurunda a\u00e7\u0131klar.&#8217; \u015feklindeki ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8220;Bilirki\u015finin Atanmas\u0131&#8221; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 63\/1. maddesinde yer alan, &#8220;\u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zel veya teknik bilgiyi gerektiren h\u00e2llerde bilirki\u015finin oy ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn al\u0131nmas\u0131na re&#8217;sen, C**** *** kat\u0131lan\u0131n, vekilinin, \u015f\u00fcphelinin veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fcdafiinin veya kanun\u00ee temsilcinin istemi \u00fczerine karar verilebilir.&#8221; \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemelere nazaran, kabahatlinin Develi il\u00e7esi Bozburun mevkiinde L34-B-19-A pafta 170 ada 19-20 nolu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz parselleri i\u00e7erisinden izinsiz ve ruhsats\u0131z pomza (bims) malzemesi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia edildi\u011fi somut olayda, dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki&nbsp;<strong>25\/12\/2016&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli ve 2016\/200 say\u0131l\u0131 olay yeri inceleme raporu ve ekindeki olay yeri foto\u011fraflar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek, kabahatlinin s\u00f6z konusu alandaki malzemenin tamam\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda etrafl\u0131ca ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca mahkemece \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zel ve teknik bilgiyi gerektiren idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m konusunda mahallinde ke\u015fif de icra edilmek suretiyle alan\u0131nda uzman ki\u015filerden bilirki\u015fi raporu ald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, bu nedenle de itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin karar verilmesinde,<br>Kabule g\u00f6re de;<br>2- Olay tarihinde &#8230; plakal\u0131 kamyona y\u00fckl\u00fc oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde ele ge\u00e7irilen ve&nbsp;<strong>25\/12\/2016&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli teslim tesell\u00fcm belgesi ile kabahatliye teslim edilen, kabahatli taraf\u0131ndan Develi il\u00e7esi Bozburun mevkiinde L34-B-19-A pafta 170 ada 19-20 nolu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz parselleri i\u00e7erisinden izinsiz ve ruhsats\u0131z olarak al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen 32 ton pomza (bims) malzemesinin bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ele ge\u00e7en malzeme miktar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle hesaplanacak idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 miktar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek kalan miktar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen iptaline karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi cihetle, belirtilen nedenle itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmemesinde,<br>\u0130sabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu&#8217;nun 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 isteminde bulunulmakla, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<br>I) Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin (1) nolu maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede;<br>Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kanun yolu olan ve \u00f6\u011fretide &#8216;ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc temyiz&#8217; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan kanun yarar\u0131na bozman\u0131n amac\u0131 hakim veya mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilen ve istinaf veya temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7meksizin kesinle\u015fen kararlar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca incelenmesini, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak da kanunlar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda \u00fclke sath\u0131nda birli\u011fe ula\u015fmak, hakim veya mahkemelerce verilen cezaya ili\u015fkin karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerdeki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 toplum ve birey a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hukuk yarar\u0131na gidermektir.<br>Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc bir kanun yolu olan kanun yarar\u0131na bozma m\u00fcessesesinin konusunu olu\u015fturabilecek kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri, ola\u011fan kanun yolu olan temyiz nedenlerine g\u00f6re dar ve k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 tutuldu\u011funda kesin h\u00fckm\u00fcn otoritesi korunmu\u015f olur.<br><strong>26.10.1932&nbsp;<\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 29\/12 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ve bu karar esas al\u0131nmak suretiyle verilen Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu ve \u00d6zel Dairelerin s\u00fcreklilik arz eden kararlar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, kabul edip etmemenin hakim veya mahkemenin takdirine ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu istekler hakk\u0131nda verilen kararlar ile kan\u0131tlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine ve \u015fahsi hakka ili\u015fkin kararlar kanun yarar\u0131na bozma konusu olamaz.<br>Mahkemece kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dosya kapsam\u0131nda t\u00fcm deliller tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p takdir edilmek suretiyle karar verildi\u011fi ve delil takdiri yap\u0131larak verilen kararlar aleyhine kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna gidilemeyece\u011finden;<br>Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin&nbsp;<strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,<br><strong>II<\/strong>) Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin (2) nolu maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede;<br>Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine dayanan ihbarnamesinin i\u00e7eri\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, Kayseri 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin&nbsp;<strong>29\/05\/2017&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihli ve 2017\/2306 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131&nbsp;<strong>CMK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 309\/4-c maddesi uyar\u0131nca, aleyhe tesir etmemek ve yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmemek \u00fczere&nbsp;<strong>BOZULMASINA<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>15\/03\/2021&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.Yarg\u0131tay19. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2019\/32167Karar No:2021\/2976K. Tarihi: 19. Ceza Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019\/32167 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/2976 K. 3213 say\u0131l\u0131 Maden Kanunu&#8217;na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k eyleminden dolay\u0131 kabahatli &#8230; hakk\u0131nda Develi Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n&nbsp;12\/01\/2017&nbsp;tarihli ve 2 say\u0131l\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131 ile uygulanan 144.212,80 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc dair Develi Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin&nbsp;21\/03\/2017&nbsp;tarihli ve 2017\/72 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[72],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11196"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11197,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11196\/revisions\/11197"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}