Esas No:2020\/9781<\/strong> 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/30 E. , 2021\/2295 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> : Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2020\/9781Karar No:2021\/3071K. Tarihi: 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/30 E. , 2021\/2295 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 : Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk DairesiDAVAT\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11194"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11194"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11195,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11194\/revisions\/11195"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3071<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVA<\/strong>T\u00dcR<\/strong>\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesince, davac\u0131 erke\u011fin sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi, e\u015fi ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ile ilgilenmedi\u011fi, birlik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmedi\u011fi, daval\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n az da olsa kusurlu bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, karara kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince, ilk derece mahkemesinin davac\u0131 erke\u011fe y\u00fckledi\u011fi kusurlar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda daval\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n da ailesinin evlili\u011fine m\u00fcdahale etmesine m\u00fcsaade etti\u011fi, ailesi gelince e\u015finin evden gitmesini istedi\u011fi, e\u015fine hakaret etmesi sebebiyle kusurlu bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve bo\u015fanman\u0131n ferilerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delillerden, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan 04.10.2016 <\/strong>tarihinde ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z tedbir nafakas\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, tedbir nafakas\u0131 davas\u0131nda erke\u011fin ba\u015fka bir kad\u0131nla g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu, e\u015fine ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na bakmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, onlar\u0131 muhta\u00e7 hale getirdi\u011fi kad\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ya\u015famakta hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kad\u0131n ve ortak \u00e7ocuklar lehine ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z tedbir nafakas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f, mahkemece verilen i\u015f bu karar 18.07.2017 <\/strong>tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 erke\u011fin eldeki davada ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vak\u0131alar\u0131 tedbir nafakas\u0131 davas\u0131nda da ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n dinlendi\u011fi ve iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tedbir nafakas\u0131 davas\u0131ndan sonra taraflar\u0131n bir araya gelmedikleri dosya kapsam\u0131yla sabittir. Bu tarihten sonra taraflar aras\u0131nda yeni bir olay\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ispat edilmedi\u011fine g\u00f6re bo\u015fanmaya sebep olan olaylarda daval\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n bir kusurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 166. maddesinde “Evlilik birli\u011fi, ortak hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeleri kendilerinden beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olursa, e\u015flerin her birinin bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011fi” h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fc, tamamen kusurlu e\u015fin de dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi ve yarar\u0131na bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc elde edebilece\u011fi bi\u00e7iminde yorumlamak ve de\u011ferlendirmek do\u011fru de\u011fildir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, kimsenin kendi eylemine ve tamamen kendi kusuruna dayanarak bir hak elde edemeyece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki temel hukuk ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fer. Di\u011fer taraftan gene b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce tek tarafl\u0131 irade ile sistemimize ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bo\u015fanma olgusunu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131r. Bo\u015fanmay\u0131 elde etmek isteyen ki\u015fi kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n hi\u00e7bir eylem ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmadan, evlilik birli\u011fini, devam\u0131 beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sarsar, sonra da mademki birlik art\u0131k sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f diyerek bo\u015fanma do\u011frultusunda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edebilir. \u00d6yle ise T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 166. maddesine g\u00f6re bo\u015fanmay\u0131 isteyebilmek i\u00e7in tamamen kusursuz ya da az kusurlu olmaya gerek olmay\u0131p, daha fazla kusurlu bulunan taraf\u0131n dahi dava hakk\u0131 bulunmakla beraber, bo\u015fanmaya karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in daval\u0131n\u0131n az da olsa kusurunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunun belirlenmesi ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r. Az kusurlu e\u015f bo\u015fanmaya kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karsa bu halin tespiti dahi tek ba\u015f\u0131na bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 verilebilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli olamaz. Az kusurlu e\u015fin kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 niteli\u011finde olmal\u0131, e\u015f ve \u00e7ocuklar i\u00e7in korunmaya de\u011fer bir yarar\u0131n kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r (TMK m. 166\/2).
Mevcut olaylara g\u00f6re evlilik birli\u011finin, devam\u0131 e\u015flerden beklenmeyecek derecede, temelinden sars\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkusuzdur. Ne var ki, bu sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 tamamen davac\u0131 erke\u011fin tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131ndan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olup, daval\u0131 kad\u0131na atf\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn hi\u00e7bir kusur ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemi\u015ftir. Bu durumda a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle erke\u011fin bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekirken, kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin yorumunda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek bo\u015fanmaya karar verilmesi usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.
SONU\u00c7:<\/strong>Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 16.03.2021 <\/strong>(Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"