Esas No:2021\/182<\/strong> 15. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/182 E. , 2021\/3202 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :Ceza Dairesi Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hakk\u0131nda, san\u0131k … ile san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafi taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131ndan sonra, Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Ceza Dairesi’nin d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, san\u0131k … ile san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc; T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2021\/182Karar No:2021\/3202K. Tarihi: 15. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/182 E. , 2021\/3202 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza DairesiSU\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kH\u00dcK\u00dcM : 1-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan; ilk dereceli K\u0131r\u015fehir A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 23\/07\/2020 tarih ve 2019\/616 E. – 2020\/196 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131; TCK‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L, 158\/3, 52\/2-4, 53 ve 63. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin, Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11.Ceza…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11193,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11192\/revisions\/11193"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3202<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
SU<\/strong>\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong> : 1-San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan; ilk dereceli K\u0131r\u015fehir A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 23\/07\/2020 <\/strong>tarih ve 2019\/616 E. – 2020\/196 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131; TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L, 158\/3, 52\/2-4, 53 ve 63. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin, Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11.Ceza Dairesi’nin d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine dair karar\u0131,
2- San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan; ilk dereceli K\u0131r\u015fehir A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 23\/07\/2020 <\/strong>tarih ve 2019\/616 E. – 2020\/196 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131; TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L, 158\/3, 52\/2-4, 53 ve 63. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin, Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Ceza Dairesi’nin d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine dair karar\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 288. maddesinde ”Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r” denilmesi ile ayn\u0131 kanunun 294. maddesinde yer alan ”Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir” h\u00fckm\u00fc ve ayn\u0131 kanunun 301. maddesinde belirtilen ”Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda belirtilen hususlar ile temyiz istemi usule ili\u015fkin noksanlardan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bunu belirten olaylar hakk\u0131nda incelemeler yapar.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeler g\u00f6zetilerek; san\u0131k …’in ‘su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funa, mahkumiyetine yeter delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na’, san\u0131k … m\u00fcdafiinin “san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funa, beraatine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fine, delillerin takdirinde hata yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, eksik incelemeye, lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na’ ili\u015fkin temyiz taleplerinin bulundu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
Su\u00e7 tarihinde kat\u0131lan …’\u0131n 0536 .. numaral\u0131 telefondan arand\u0131\u011f\u0131, telefonla arayan ki\u015filerin kendisini polis memuru olarak tan\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kat\u0131lana banka hesab\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7a kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelileri yakalamak i\u00e7in hesab\u0131nda bulunan 150.000TL’yi \u00e7ekip ikametten ayr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedikleri, kat\u0131lan\u0131n banka hesab\u0131ndan 100.000TL’yi \u00e7ekip ikametinde bekledi\u011fi ve ak\u015fam kendisini polis memuru olarak tan\u0131tan birinin ikametine gelerek 100.000TL’yi al\u0131p gitti\u011fi, san\u0131klar her ne kadar \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmeseler de san\u0131klar\u0131n tespitine y\u00f6nelik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar neticesinde elde edilen TAPE<\/strong> kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla ilgili olarak d\u00fczenlenen 20\/06\/2019 <\/strong>tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda, s\u00f6z konusu konu\u015fmalar\u0131n san\u0131klara ait oldu\u011funun bildirildi\u011fi, TAPE<\/strong> kay\u0131tlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendi aralar\u0131nda yapt\u0131klar\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinde kat\u0131lan\u0131n ev adresi, numaras\u0131, ya\u015f\u0131 ve eldenci olarak tabir edilen \u015fahsa teslim etti\u011fi para miktar\u0131n\u0131 konu\u015ftuklar\u0131 , b\u00f6ylece san\u0131klar\u0131n \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 kendilerini kamu g\u00f6revlisi olarak tan\u0131tmak suretiyle nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri iddia ve kabul olunan somut olayda;
1-) San\u0131k … B\u00fcy\u00fcklere y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelemesinde;
San\u0131k savunmas\u0131, kat\u0131lan beyan\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporu ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan ilk derece mahkemesinin TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L ve 158\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince verilen d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/1-L-son maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde ceza tayin edilmesine ra\u011fmen, an\u0131lan maddenin son f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmde yaz\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ise de, bu eksikli\u011fin mahallinde tamamlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve yine h\u00fckm\u00fcn 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa verilen ‘15.000’ g\u00fcn adli para cezas\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken sehven ‘15.500’ g\u00fcn adli para cezas\u0131 olarak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak paraya \u00e7evirmede hata bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, s\u00f6z konusu maddi hatan\u0131n mahallinde d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen ve de\u011ferlendirilen delillere, olu\u015fa ve mahkemenin soru\u015fturma sonucunda olu\u015fan inan\u00e7 ve takdirine, su\u00e7un olu\u015fumuna ve niteli\u011fine uygun kabul ve uygulamas\u0131na, hukuka uygun, yasal ve yeterli olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re, san\u0131k …’in yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 302\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, usul ve yasaya uygun olan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong>\u0130STEMLER\u0130N\u0130N<\/strong>ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n 28\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 304. maddesi gere\u011fince K\u0131r\u015fehir A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** TEVD\u0130\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2-) San\u0131k …’a y\u00f6nelik temyiz incelemesinde;
Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen delillere, mahkemenin kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun olarak olu\u015fan kanaat ve takdirine, incelenen dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 226. maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011fa ek savunma hakk\u0131 verilmeden, TCK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 158\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezada art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131,
Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n 28\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 304. maddesi gere\u011fince K\u0131r\u015fehir A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** TEVD\u0130\u0130NE<\/strong>, 18.03.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"