{"id":11180,"date":"2022-06-28T08:07:26","date_gmt":"2022-06-28T08:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=11180"},"modified":"2022-07-20T06:59:40","modified_gmt":"2022-07-20T06:59:40","slug":"yargitay-19-ceza-dairesi-2019-29086-e-2021-3764-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2022\/06\/28\/yargitay-19-ceza-dairesi-2019-29086-e-2021-3764-k\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 19. Ceza Dairesi 2019\/29086 E. 2021\/3764 K."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

T.C.
Yarg\u0131tay
19. Ceza Dairesi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Esas No:2019\/29086<\/strong>
Karar No:2021\/3764<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

19. Ceza Dairesi         2019\/29086 E.  ,  2021\/3764 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun 65\/1-b ve 65\/7. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmak eyleminden dolay\u0131 kabahatli … hakk\u0131nda 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 ve 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezalar\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na dair, D\u00f6rtyol Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun reddine ili\u015fkin D\u00f6rtyol Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 23\/07\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/615 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, an\u0131lan Kanun’un 65\/1-b ve 65\/7. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmak eyleminden dolay\u0131 ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en kabahatli hakk\u0131nda 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 ve 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezalar\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na dair C**** *** Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 290883 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine, 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 290883 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile an\u0131lan idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile an\u0131lan tutanakla uygulanan 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ayn\u0131 tutanakla uygulanan 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin C**** *** Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 05\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/1192 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f, 2018\/1192 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 aleyhine Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 08\/04\/2019 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 2730 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemini i\u00e7eren yaz\u0131s\u0131 ekinde bulunan dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** 17\/04\/2019 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve KYB<\/strong>-2019-40181 say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarnamesi ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle okundu.
An\u0131lan ihbarnamede;
1- D\u00f6rtyol Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 23\/07\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/615 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede,
5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 15\/2. maddesinde yer alan, ‘Ayn\u0131 kabahatin birden fazla i\u015flenmesi halinde her bir kabahatle ilgili olarak ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 verilir. Kesintisiz fiille i\u015flenebilen kabahatlerde, bu nedenle idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 verilinceye kadar fiil tek say\u0131l\u0131r.’ \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde kabahatliye ait … plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile g\u0131da ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131rken, Adana ili C**** *** C**** *** Karayollura Denetim \u0130stasyonu ekiplerince saat 14:54’te durdurularak yap\u0131lan tart\u0131m i\u015flemi neticesinde tonaj\u0131n fazla olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan C**** *** Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 290883 seri numaral\u0131 idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar tutana\u011f\u0131 ile 1.830,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip, kabahatlinin tonaj art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yeni bir eylemi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu arac\u0131n Hatay ili D\u00f6rtyol il\u00e7esi Kuzuculu mevkiinde ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 15:46’da tekrar durduruldu\u011fu, yap\u0131lan tart\u0131m i\u015flemi neticesinde tonaj\u0131n\u0131n fazla oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 eylem nedeniyle kabahatliye iki kez ayn\u0131 idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, an\u0131lan denetim istasyonunca d\u00fczenlenen 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n bu y\u00f6nden kabul\u00fc ile s\u00f6z konusu idar\u00ee yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesinde,
2- C**** *** Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 05\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/1192 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede,
a) Mahkemesince C**** *** Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 290883 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee paras\u0131 cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile an\u0131lan idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de;
Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi 128\/d-2 maddesi gere\u011fince kabahatliye ait arac\u0131n azami y\u00fckl\u00fc a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 40.000 kg olarak belirlendi\u011fi, Ara\u00e7lar\u0131n Y\u00fcklemine \u0130li\u015fkin \u00d6l\u00e7\u00fc Ve Usuller \u0130le Tart\u0131 Ve Boyut \u00d6**** *** Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik’in tart\u0131 tolerans\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 7. Maddesine g\u00f6re tart\u0131 tolerans\u0131n\u0131n en \u00e7ok [(arac\u0131n azami a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n %3,75’i)+500] kg olarak kabul edildi\u011fi, 40.000 kg azami a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan arac\u0131n tolerans\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ise en \u00e7ok 42.000 kg olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ancak yap\u0131lan 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarih saat 14:54’te yap\u0131lan kontrolde arac\u0131n y\u00fckl\u00fc a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 42.250 kg oldu\u011fu tespit edilerek toleransl\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 250 kg – %10’dan fazla oranda a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan muteriz hakk\u0131nda 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun 65\/1-b maddesi (% 10 fazlas\u0131na kadar y\u00fcklemeler) uyar\u0131nca 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 ile birlikte ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 65\/7. Maddesindeki “G\u00f6nderenin birden fazla olmas\u0131 veya tespit edilememesi halinde birinci f\u0131kraya uymayan i\u015fleten ve g\u00f6nderen i\u00e7in uygulanacak idar\u00ee para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n toplam\u0131 i\u015fletene uygulan\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeye nazaran ayr\u0131ca 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015f ise de; 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve A 635215 seri numaral\u0131 sevk irsaliyesine g\u00f6re mal\u0131 g\u00f6nderenin belirsiz ve birden fazla olmay\u0131p, Migros Ticaret A.\u015e. oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda muteriz hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan Kanun’un 65\/7. maddesine g\u00f6re idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 cihetle, 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 290883 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine; kabahatli hakk\u0131nda 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 65\/7. maddesi uyar\u0131nca uygulanan 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul\u00fc ile an\u0131lan idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 65\/1-b maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanan 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinde,
b) Mahkemesince, D\u00f6rtyol Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine, itiraz\u0131n 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul\u00fc ile di\u011fer 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de;
5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 22\/4. maddesinde yer alan “4.12.2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun yer bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetki kurallar\u0131 kabahatler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da ge\u00e7erlidir” \u015feklindeki h\u00fckm\u00fc nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kabahat eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi yerin D\u00f6rtyol il\u00e7e s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yetkili yerin D\u00f6rtyol Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, D\u00f6rtyol Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvurusu hakk\u0131nda yetkisizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilerek karar verilmesinde, isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309.maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 isteminde bulunulmakla, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;
I-Kanun yarar\u0131na bozmaya konu ihbarnamenin (2-b) numaral\u0131 bendi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede;
D\u00f6rtyol Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve IH<\/strong> 270304 seri numaral\u0131 idari para cezas\u0131 karar tutana\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda D\u00f6rtyol Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 23\/07\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/615 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile kesin olarak ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilmi\u015f olunmas\u0131 nedeniyle, ayn\u0131 idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvurunun esastan incelenerek k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair karar verilmesinin usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 05\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarih, 2015\/4-113 Esas, 2019\/67 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekli ile m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair C**** *** Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 05\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/1192 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n an\u0131lan idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik 2 numaral\u0131 bendinin yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu, bu bak\u0131mdan an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinin ve hukuk d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma incelemesine konu da edilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla;
Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteminin REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
II<\/strong>-Kanun yarar\u0131na bozmaya konu ihbarnamenin (1) numaral\u0131 bendi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede;
Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine dayanan ihbarname i\u00e7eri\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, D\u00f6rtyol Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 23\/07\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/615 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n CMK<\/strong>‘nin 309\/4\/-d maddesi uyar\u0131nca kanun yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, muteriz hakk\u0131nda uygulanan idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,
II<\/strong>I-Kanun yarar\u0131na bozmaya konu ihbarnamenin (2-a) numaral\u0131 bendi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan incelemede;
“G\u00f6nderenin birden fazla olmas\u0131 veya tespit edilememesi halinde birinci f\u0131kraya uymayan i\u015fleten ve g\u00f6nderen i\u00e7in uygulanacak idar\u00ee para cezalar\u0131n\u0131n toplam\u0131 i\u015fletene uygulan\u0131r.” h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 65\/8 maddesinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma ihbarnamesinde ”65\/7” olarak g\u00f6sterilmesinin maddi hata olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;
Yarg\u0131tay C**** *** kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemine dayanan ihbarname i\u00e7eri\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden C**** *** Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 05\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 2018\/1192 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ”1-” numaral\u0131 bendinin CMK<\/strong>‘nin 309\/4-c maddesi uyar\u0131nca aleyhe tesir etmemek ve yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmemek \u00fczere kanun yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, 29\/03\/2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C.Yarg\u0131tay19. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2019\/29086Karar No:2021\/3764K. Tarihi: 19. Ceza Dairesi         2019\/29086 E.  ,  2021\/3764 K. 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun 65\/1-b ve 65\/7. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmak eyleminden dolay\u0131 kabahatli … hakk\u0131nda 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 ve 915,00 T\u00fcrk liras\u0131 idar\u00ee para cezalar\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na dair, D\u00f6rtyol Kuzuculu Karayollar\u0131 Denetim \u0130stasyonunun 20\/02\/2018 tarihli ve IH 270304 seri numaral\u0131 trafik idar\u00ee para cezas\u0131…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[72],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11180"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11180"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11180\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11181,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11180\/revisions\/11181"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}