{"id":11174,"date":"2022-06-28T08:04:25","date_gmt":"2022-06-28T08:04:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=11174"},"modified":"2022-07-20T07:00:09","modified_gmt":"2022-07-20T07:00:09","slug":"yargitay-15-ceza-dairesi-2021-3308-e-2021-4078-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2022\/06\/28\/yargitay-15-ceza-dairesi-2021-3308-e-2021-4078-k\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Ceza Dairesi 2021\/3308 E. 2021\/4078 K."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3>T.C.<br>Yarg\u0131tay<br>15. Ceza Dairesi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Esas No:2021\/3308<\/strong><br><strong>Karar No:2021\/4078<\/strong><br><strong>K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>15. Ceza Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2021\/3308 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/4078 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>&nbsp;:Ceza Dairesi<br><strong>SU<\/strong>\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k<br><strong>H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong>&nbsp;: Kayseri 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin&nbsp;<strong>16\/10\/2020&nbsp;<\/strong>tarih ve 2019\/592 Esas, 2020\/382 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; 1-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;<strong>TCK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet 2-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;<strong>TCK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53, 58 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet 3-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;<strong>TCK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 62\/1, 52\/2-4, 53 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet 4-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;<strong>TCK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 62\/1, 52\/2-4, 53 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine kar\u015f\u0131 Kayseri B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ve istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine dair kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler hakk\u0131nda san\u0131k &#8230; ve m\u00fcdafii, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii, san\u0131k &#8230; ve m\u00fcdafii, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131ndan sonra, Kayseri B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;nin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ve d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br>5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 299&#8217;uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan &#8216;san\u0131\u011f\u0131n veya kat\u0131lan\u0131n temyiz ba\u015fvurusundaki istemi \u00fczerine veya re&#8217;sen duru\u015fma yoluyla yapar&#8217; ibaresi&nbsp;<strong>24.12.2017&nbsp;<\/strong>tarih 696 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin 100. maddesi ile &#8216;uygun g\u00f6rmesi halinde duru\u015fma yoluyla yapabilir&#8217; \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi ve daha sonra bu h\u00fck\u00fcm&nbsp;<strong>01\/02\/2018&nbsp;<\/strong>tarih ve 7079 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 94. maddesiyle aynen kabul edilerek kanunla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir bir neden g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden, takdiren san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme isteminin, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131&nbsp;<strong>CMK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 299. maddeleri gere\u011fince reddine karar verilerek, ayr\u0131ca san\u0131klar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi C**** *** taraf\u0131ndan temyiz taleplerinden vazge\u00e7tikleri belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<br>5271 say\u0131l\u0131&nbsp;<strong>CMK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 288. maddesinde &#8221;Temyiz, ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedenine dayan\u0131r. Bir hukuk kural\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 veya yanl\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r&#8221; denilmesi ile ayn\u0131 kanunun 294. maddesinde yer alan &#8221;Temyiz eden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn neden dolay\u0131 bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r. Temyiz sebebi ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn hukuki y\u00f6n\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olabilir&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fc ve ayn\u0131 kanunun 301. maddesinde belirtilen &#8221;Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda belirtilen hususlar ile temyiz istemi usule ili\u015fkin noksanlardan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bunu belirten olaylar hakk\u0131nda incelemeler yapar.&#8221; \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeler g\u00f6zetilerek; san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin, &#8216;san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 beraatine karar verilmesi gerekirken lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulanmadan usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak mahkumiyetine karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131&#8217; nedeniyle, kat\u0131lan vekilinin, san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda eksik ceza belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bozulmas\u0131na&#8217; ili\u015fkin temyiz taleplerinin bulundu\u011fu belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<br>Kat\u0131lan\u0131 arayan \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n kendilerini karakol komutan\u0131 ve savc\u0131 olarak tan\u0131tarak,&nbsp;<strong>FET<\/strong>\u00d6 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle iltisakl\u0131 ki\u015filerin hesab\u0131ndan para \u00e7ekti\u011fini, hesab\u0131nda bulunan para ve ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 teslim etmesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6yledikleri, bunun \u00fczerine kat\u0131lan\u0131n san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;a ait hesaba 22.650&nbsp;<strong>TL<\/strong>&nbsp;para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi,&nbsp;<strong>PTT<\/strong>&nbsp;\u00fczerinden hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen &#8230;&#8217;a ait hesaba 1.312&nbsp;<strong>TL<\/strong>&nbsp;para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, bilaharede kat\u0131lana ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011fu, yakla\u015f\u0131k 200.000&nbsp;<strong>TL<\/strong>&nbsp;de\u011ferinde ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131 oldu\u011funu duyunca bu ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 belirtilen adrese getirmesini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan\u0131n ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 buraya b\u0131rak\u0131p gitti\u011fi, eve geldi\u011finde doland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlamas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, bu \u015fekilde san\u0131klar\u0131n nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilen olayda; san\u0131klar\u0131n a\u015famalardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili savunmalar\u0131, kat\u0131lan\u0131n istikrarl\u0131 beyanlar\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131, banka hesap hareketleri,&nbsp;<strong>PTS<\/strong>&nbsp;kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ve \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun d\u00fczeltilerek esastan reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<br>Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen ve de\u011ferlendirilen delillere, olu\u015fa ve mahkemenin soru\u015fturma sonucunda olu\u015fan inan\u00e7 ve takdirine, su\u00e7un olu\u015fumuna ve niteli\u011fine uygun kabul ve uygulamas\u0131na, hukuka uygun, yasal ve yeterli olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re, san\u0131k &#8230; m\u00fcdafiinin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 beraatine karar verilmesi gerekirken lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulanmadan usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak mahkumiyetine karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, kat\u0131lan vekilinin, san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda eksik ceza belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131&nbsp;<strong>CMK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 302\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, usul ve yasaya uygun olan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik&nbsp;<strong>TEMY\u0130Z<\/strong><strong>\u0130STEMLER\u0130N\u0130N<\/strong><strong>AYRI<\/strong><strong>AYRI<\/strong><strong>ESASTAN<\/strong><strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n&nbsp;<strong>28\/02\/2019&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihinde Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 7165 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 8. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131&nbsp;<strong>CMK<\/strong>&#8216;n\u0131n 304\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince Kayseri 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;ne, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise Kayseri B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 8. Ceza Dairesi&#8217;ne g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na&nbsp;<strong>TEVD\u0130\u0130NE<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>05\/04\/2021&nbsp;<\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.Yarg\u0131tay15. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2021\/3308Karar No:2021\/4078K. Tarihi: 15. Ceza Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2021\/3308 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/4078 K. MAHKEMES\u0130&nbsp;:Ceza DairesiSU\u00c7 : Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131kH\u00dcK\u00dcM&nbsp;: Kayseri 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi&#8217;nin&nbsp;16\/10\/2020&nbsp;tarih ve 2019\/592 Esas, 2020\/382 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; 1-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;TCK&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53 maddeleri gere\u011fince mahkumiyet 2-San\u0131k &#8230; hakk\u0131nda;&nbsp;TCK&#8216;n\u0131n 158\/1-l-son, 158\/3, 43\/1, 52\/2-4, 53, 58 maddeleri gere\u011fince&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[70],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11174"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11174"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11175,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11174\/revisions\/11175"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}