Esas No:2020\/9895<\/strong> 5. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/9895 E. , 2021\/4408 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>:Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz bedelinin tahsili davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda: Davan\u0131n 767 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n maliklerinden muris Mustafa Bulut miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, 747 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmadan kaynaklanan tazminat talebinin kabul\u00fcne dair verilen yukar\u0131da g\u00fcn ve say\u0131lar\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi, taraf vekillerince, duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak incelenmesi ise davac\u0131lar vekili y\u00f6n\u00fcnden verilen dilek\u00e7eler ile istenilmi\u015f ise de duru\u015fma de\u011feri s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fundan reddi ile incelemenin evrak \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilerek dosyadaki belgeler okunup uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay5. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2020\/9895Karar No:2021\/4408K. Tarihi: 5. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/9895 E. , 2021\/4408 K. MAHKEMES\u0130:Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el at\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz bedelinin tahsili davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda: Davan\u0131n 767 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n maliklerinden muris Mustafa Bulut miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, 747 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kamula\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131z el atmadan kaynaklanan tazminat talebinin…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11162"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11162"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11163,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11162\/revisions\/11163"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/4408<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
K A R A R –
Mahkemece bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak karar verilmi\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcm; taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
Taraf vekillerinin bozma ile kesinle\u015fen y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir. Ancak,
Mahkemece bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmu\u015f ise de bozma gerekleri tam olarak yerine getirilememi\u015ftir. \u015e\u00f6yleki,
1)Dosya i\u00e7indeki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re; 11.02.2015 <\/strong>tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, muris … miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu 747 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 20.825,39 TL<\/strong> bedel tespit edildi\u011fine ve davac\u0131lar vekilince \u0131slah da yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, bu bedel yerine gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilmeden 726,47 TL<\/strong>‘ye h\u00fckmedilmesi,2)Dairemiz bozma ilam\u0131nda, dava konusu 767 parsel de … miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine ra\u011fmen, bu parsel y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmamas\u0131,
3)Bozma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde infazda da teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131racak \u015fekilde bedeline h\u00fckmedilen ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda davac\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile yol olarak terkinine karar verilmemesi,Do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.Taraf vekillerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, davac\u0131dan pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenildi\u011finde iadesine ve temyize ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131n\u0131n Hazineye irad kaydedilmesine, 30\/03\/2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"