Esas No:2021\/2749<\/strong> n\u0131n11. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2749 E. , 2021\/3294 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> : B\u00d6LGE<\/strong>ADL\u0130YE<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> 13. HUKUK<\/strong>DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi’nce verilen 12.11.2020 <\/strong>tarih ve 2020\/1387 E. – 2020\/1295 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, temyiz isteminin reddine dair \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi’nce verilen 26.01.2021 <\/strong>tarih ve 2020\/1387 E. – 2020\/1295 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ek karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay11. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2021\/2749Karar No:2021\/3294K. Tarihi: n\u0131n11. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2749 E. , 2021\/3294 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 : B\u00d6LGEADL\u0130YEMAHKEMES\u0130 13. HUKUKDA\u0130RES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi’nce verilen 12.11.2020 tarih ve 2020\/1387 E. – 2020\/1295 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, temyiz isteminin reddine dair \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 13. Hukuk Dairesi’nce verilen 26.01.2021 tarih ve…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11098"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11098"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11099,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11098\/revisions\/11099"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3294<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dava, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin ihyas\u0131 talebine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 362\/1-\u00e7 maddesi gere\u011fince kesin olarak karar verilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmu\u015f ise de, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince 26.01.2021 <\/strong>tarihli ek kararla, karar\u0131n HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 362\/1-\u00e7 maddesi gere\u011fince kesin olarak verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n temyizinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar vermi\u015f, ek karar daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
1-B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle \u015firket ihyas\u0131 talebinin kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik verilen 12.11.2020 <\/strong>tarihli karar\u0131n HMK<\/strong> 362\/1-\u00e7 maddesi gere\u011fince kesin oldu\u011fundan bahisle 26.01.2021 <\/strong>tarihli ek karar ile daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, Dairemizin yerle\u015fmi\u015f kararlar\u0131na g\u00f6re Ticaret Sicil M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin 6102 say\u0131l\u0131 Y**** *** 547 maddesine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lan ihya davas\u0131nda yasal has\u0131m olmas\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131lan davada da …’n\u00fcn daval\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi sebebiyle, a\u00e7\u0131lan dava \u00e7eki\u015fmesiz yarg\u0131ya tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131 … vekilinin 26.01.2021 <\/strong>tarihli ek karar\u0131n temyizi isteminin kabul\u00fc ile ek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak daval\u0131 … vekilinin as\u0131l karara y\u00f6nelik temyiz sebeplerinin incelenmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.
2-\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen karara y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 355 vd. maddeleri kapsam\u0131nda y\u00f6ntemince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince esastan verilen nihai kararda, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re saptanan somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 369\/1. ve 371. maddelerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirici nedenlerin de bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re usul ve yasaya uygun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
SONU\u00c7<\/strong>: Yukar\u0131da (1) no’lu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, daval\u0131 … vekilinin temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fc ile 26.01.2021 <\/strong>tarihli ek karar\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA<\/strong>, (2) no’lu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz isteminin reddi ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 370\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA<\/strong>, HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 372. maddesi uyar\u0131nca i\u015flem yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, temyiz harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na mahal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, 05.04.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"