Esas No:2018\/5690<\/strong> a16. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/5690 E. , 2021\/3458 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>HUKUK<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay16. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2018\/5690Karar No:2021\/3458K. Tarihi: a16. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/5690 E. , 2021\/3458 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YEHUKUKMAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc:Yarg\u0131tay bozma ilam\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; ‘Mahkemece yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve incelemenin h\u00fck\u00fcm vermek i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11092"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11092"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11093,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11092\/revisions\/11093"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3458<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yarg\u0131tay bozma ilam\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; ‘Mahkemece yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve incelemenin h\u00fck\u00fcm vermek i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’ nun 31. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devinin bulundu\u011fu ve mevcut ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek, her iki senette de imzalar\u0131 bulunan senet tan\u0131klar\u0131 ile ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyeleri de haz\u0131r oldu\u011fu halde mahallinde yeniden ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131, yerel bilirki\u015filer, taraf tan\u0131klar\u0131 ve an\u0131lan senetlerde tan\u0131k ve ihtiyar heyeti \u00fcyeleri olarak imzalar\u0131 bulunan ki\u015filerden, \u00e7eki\u015fmeli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan binadaki Y**** *** ait pay\u0131n daval\u0131 …’ye mi sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yoksa davac\u0131 …’a m\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda do\u011fan \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi giderecek \u015fekilde bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcleri sorulup, senetlerin ne sebeple d\u00fczenlendi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, hangi senedin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funun saptanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015filerin beyanlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda do\u011fabilecek \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin gerekti\u011finde y\u00fczle\u015ftirme yap\u0131larak y\u00f6ntemince giderilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bundan sonra toplanan ve toplanacak t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek ula\u015f\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi’ gere\u011fine de\u011finilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 122 ada 23 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde bulunan ah\u015fap evin 3\/12 pay\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 … miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na ait oldu\u011funun tespitine ve beyanlar hanesine \u015ferh verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 … miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, mahkemece h\u00fckm\u00fcne uyulan bozma karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na, delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, yerinde bulunmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve yasaya uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA<\/strong>, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye nispi temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden daval\u0131dan al\u0131nmas\u0131na, yasal ko\u015fullar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 08.04.2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"