Esas No:2019\/2594<\/strong> n\u0131n11. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/2594 E. , 2021\/3485 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nce bozmaya uyularak verilen 26.12.2018 <\/strong>tarih ve 2014\/336-2018\/1381 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131lar …, …, …, … vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili ve daval\u0131 … vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmal\u0131, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak istenildi\u011fi ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 09.02.2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fkaca gelen olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yoklama ile anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131p haz\u0131r bulunan davac\u0131 vekili Av. …, daval\u0131lardan …, …, …, … vekili Av. … ile … ve … vekili Av. … ile … vekili Av. … dinlenildikten sonra duru\u015fmal\u0131 i\u015flerin yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve s\u00fcre darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ileriye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131. Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenildikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay11. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2019\/2594Karar No:2021\/3485K. Tarihi: n\u0131n11. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/2594 E. , 2021\/3485 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :T\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u0130stanbul 10. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nce bozmaya uyularak verilen 26.12.2018 tarih ve 2014\/336-2018\/1381 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131lar …, …, …, … vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili ve daval\u0131 … vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmal\u0131, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11084"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11084"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11084\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11085,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11084\/revisions\/11085"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3485<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 vekili, Emlak Bankas\u0131 A\u015e … \u015eubesi taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6rsa Grubuna ait \u00d6rsa Tekstil, \u00d6ray Tekstil, \u0130mateks Tekstil’in toplam 6.500.000 DM<\/strong> tutar\u0131nda ilave kredi teklif edildi\u011fi ve kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015famada grubun yeterli teminat\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kredi kulland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken gerekli prosed\u00fcre uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bankan\u0131n zarara u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, tahsilde tekerr\u00fcr olmamak kayd\u0131 ile 7.272.604.006.552 TL<\/strong>‘nin kredinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren i\u015fleyecek kamu bankalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 en y\u00fcksek mevduat faiz oran\u0131 \u00fczerinden faizi ile birlikte t\u00fcm daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131lar vekilleri, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.
Mahkemece, daval\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131klar\u0131, banka y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyelerinin gerek eylem gerekse dava tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK<\/strong>‘nun 336.maddesi uyar\u0131nca da sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu sorumlulu\u011fun a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f sorumluluk niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu, y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyeleri kurtulu\u015f beyyinesini ispat etmedikleri s\u00fcrece s\u00f6z konusu zarardan sorumlu olduklar\u0131, yine banka … \u015eubesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 ile b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrleri ve kredi de\u011ferlendirme g\u00f6revlilerinin de s\u00f6z konusu kredinin kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda kas\u0131t ve ihmallerinin bulundu\u011fu gerk\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul ve k\u0131smen reddi ile toplam 2.553.157,57 TL<\/strong>‘nin daval\u0131lar Muris … miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 Ay\u015fe \u0130rem Maro K\u0131r\u0131\u015f ve … d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki daval\u0131lardan tahsiline; daval\u0131 … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u00e7\u0131lan dosyan\u0131n ise bu dosyadan tefrikine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar …, …, …, … vekili, Daval\u0131 … vekili, daval\u0131 … vekili, Daval\u0131 … vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin (2) nolu bent d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.
2- Mahkemece, as\u0131l alaca\u011fa dava tarihinden itibaren yasal faiz i\u015fletilmi\u015fse de, 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bu kanunda d\u00fczenlenen hususlarda bir ticari i\u015fletmeyi ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015flem ve fiiller ticari i\u015f oldu\u011fundan, davan\u0131n banka y\u00f6neticilerinin sorumlulu\u011funa ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ticari i\u015ftir ve 3095 say\u0131l\u0131 Y**** *** 2\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince avans faizi istenebilir. Bu itibarla, h\u00fckmedilen alaca\u011fa yasal faiz i\u015fletilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
3- Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n eski y\u00f6netim kurulu \u00fcyeleri ve y\u00f6neticileri hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan sorumluluk davas\u0131 olup, mahkemece daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funa karar verilmi\u015f ise de, olay tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 6762 say\u0131l\u0131 TTK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 309\/son maddesinde, tazminat isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n zarar\u0131 ve mesul olan kimseyi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren 2 y\u0131l ve her halde zarar\u0131 do\u011furan fiilin vukuu tarihinden itibaren 5 y\u0131l i\u00e7inde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olup, somut olayda usuls\u00fcz kredi i\u015flemine onay veren y\u00f6netim kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n 28.03.1997 tarihinde al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, kredinin 01.04.1997 tarihinde kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015fbu davan\u0131n ise 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra 04.12.2002 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle, daval\u0131lar\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi kabul edilerek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilip yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, karar\u0131n bu nedenle m\u00fcmeyyiz daval\u0131lar yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.
4- Bozma sebep ve \u015fekline g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar vekillerinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (1) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin (2) nolu bent d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>, (2) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, (3) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle m\u00fcmeyyiz daval\u0131lar vekillerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn m\u00fcmeyyiz daval\u0131lar yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, (4) Bozma sebep ve \u015fekline g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar vekillerinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, takdir olunan 3.050,00 TL<\/strong> duru\u015fma vekalet \u00fccretinin temyiz etmeyen daval\u0131lardan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, takdir olunan 3.050,00 TL<\/strong> duru\u015fma vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131lara verilmesine, \u00f6dedikleri pe\u015fin temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istekleri halinde temyiz eden taraflara iadesine, 08.04.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"