Esas No:2018\/4604<\/strong> 16. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/4604 E. , 2021\/3500 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>HUKUK<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay16. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2018\/4604Karar No:2021\/3500K. Tarihi: 16. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/4604 E. , 2021\/3500 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :ASL\u0130YEHUKUKMAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc:Kadastro sonucu, … \u0130l\u00e7esi … K\u00f6y\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alan\u0131nda bulunan 2187 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 13.600,00 metrekare y\u00fcz\u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcndeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, kom\u015fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza uygulanan…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11076"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11076"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11077,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11076\/revisions\/11077"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3500<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kadastro sonucu, … \u0130l\u00e7esi … K\u00f6y\u00fc \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alan\u0131nda bulunan 2187 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 13.600,00 metrekare y\u00fcz\u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcndeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, kom\u015fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza uygulanan vergi kayd\u0131 miktar fazlas\u0131 olarak kamu orta mal\u0131 mera niteli\u011finde s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131larak \u00f6zel siciline yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 …, irsen intikal ve kazand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 zilyetli\u011fine dayanarak, tapu iptali ve ad\u0131na tescili istemiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece verilen, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, \u00e7eki\u015fmeli 2187 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mera sicil kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tapuya kay\u0131t ve tesciline ili\u015fkin \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm, Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesinin 22.09.1994 <\/strong>tarih ve 1994\/6606-10288 Esas, Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla, “dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n meradan geni\u015fletilmek suretiyle elde edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ve zilyetlikle kazan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi” gere\u011fine de\u011finilerek bozulmu\u015f ve bozma ilam\u0131 sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda 23.12.2015 <\/strong>tarihli celsede bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na karar verildikten sonra, 11.01.2017 <\/strong>tarihli celsede bu kez direnme karar\u0131 verilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’ nun 15.11.2017 <\/strong>tarih 2017\/8-2622 Esas, 2017\/1367 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla, “Bozma karar\u0131na uymu\u015f olan mahkemenin bu karar\u0131 ile ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, daha sonra bu karar\u0131ndan d\u00f6nerek direnme karar\u0131 veremeyece\u011fi belirtilerek, bozma ilam\u0131na uyulmakla olu\u015fan usul\u00fc m\u00fcktesep hakk\u0131 ihlal edecek \u015fekilde direnme karar\u0131 verilmesinin isabetsizli\u011fine” de\u011finilerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir, Mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA<\/strong>, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edenlerden al\u0131nmas\u0131na,
yasal ko\u015fullar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 09.04.2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"