Esas No:2020\/8421<\/strong> 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/8421 E. , 2021\/3758 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :\u0130CRA<\/strong>HUKUK<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Silifke \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 26\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarih 2019\/20 esas 2019\/33 karar say\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde istinaf yolu ile tetkiki davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine dosya dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen inceleme raporu dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Somut olayda; icra takibinin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan ilam, bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131n\u0131n fer’isi olan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup, bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc taraflar\u0131n karar\u0131 temyiz etmemesi \u00fczerine 01\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn 01.06.2018 <\/strong>tarihinde kesinle\u015fmesi nedeniyle, feri kalemler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 23\/01\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde yap\u0131lan ilaml\u0131 takipte bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmamaktad\u0131r. (Benzer karar Yarg\u0131tay 12. Hukuk Dairesinin 25\/10\/2018 tarih 2018\/4469 esas 2018\/10618 karar) MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> : … B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen karar\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc : T.C.Yarg\u0131tay12. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2020\/8421Karar No:2021\/3758K. Tarihi: 12. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/8421 E. , 2021\/3758 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130CRAHUKUKMAHKEMES\u0130 Silifke \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 26\/02\/2019 tarih 2019\/20 esas 2019\/33 karar say\u0131l\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde istinaf yolu ile tetkiki davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine dosya dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen inceleme raporu dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11014"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11014\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11015,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11014\/revisions\/11015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/3758<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVA<\/strong>: Davac\u0131 bor\u00e7lu vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkili aleyhine… \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2019\/706 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile… 3.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/42 esas 2018\/93 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dayanak ilam\u0131 nafaka ve tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden m\u00fcvekkilinin temyiz etti\u011fini, temyiz sonucu onama karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini ve 02\/01\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde taraflar\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck karar d\u00fczeltme s\u00fcresi dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kesinle\u015fme \u015ferhi vurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla nafakaya ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n Ocak ay\u0131 sonu itibariyle kesinle\u015fece\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili hakk\u0131nda yine… \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2015\/1732 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile icra takibi ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin nafakas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli olarak \u00f6dedi\u011fini, bu dosya \u00fczerinden muht\u0131ra ile nafakan\u0131n 100,00 TL<\/strong> artt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kesinle\u015fmeden sonra nafakan\u0131n 450,00 TL<\/strong> oldu\u011funa dair muht\u0131ra \u00e7ekilmesi gerekirken m\u00fcvekkilini zarara u\u011fratmak i\u00e7in ek olarak icra vekalet \u00fccreti ve icra harc\u0131 ve di\u011fer \u00fccretler olarak m\u00fcvekkilini ekonomik buhrana u\u011fratmak i\u00e7in yeni bir icra takibini usuls\u00fcz olarak ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu icra dosyas\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkilinin hi\u00e7bir borcu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, nafaka ya ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn Ocak ay\u0131 sonuna denk gelmesine ra\u011fmen Ocak 2019 ay\u0131 nafaka bedelini de yat\u0131rm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu beyan ederek… \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2019\/706 esas\u0131nda kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan icra takibinin iptaline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
CEVAP<\/strong>: Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; … \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2019\/706 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda takip ile … \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2015\/1732 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile tahsilde tekerr\u00fcre neden olmamak kayd\u0131 ile takibe dayanak ilam\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihinde itibaren 2018\/ y\u0131l\u0131 Haziran, Temmuz, A\u011fustos, E**** *** ve Kas\u0131m aylar\u0131 fark nafaka bedelleri ile 2019 y\u0131l\u0131 Ocak ay\u0131 nafaka bedelinin ve ayr\u0131ca her ay\u0131n 1. g\u00fcn\u00fcnde tahakkuk edecek ayl\u0131k 450.00 TL<\/strong> yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n tahsilinin talep edildi\u011fini, takip \u015feklinin ilaml\u0131 takip oldu\u011funu, … \u0130cra Dairesi’nin 2015\/1732 esas say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda ise takip ile “Silifke 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin ara karar\u0131 gere\u011fi h\u00fckmedilen ayl\u0131k 350,00 TL<\/strong> tedbir alaca\u011f\u0131 nafakas\u0131n\u0131n tahsili talep edildi\u011fini, takip \u015feklinin ilams\u0131z takip oldu\u011funu, 08.10.2014-<\/strong>08.03.2015 <\/strong>tarihleri aras\u0131nda i\u015fleyen 5 ayl\u0131k tedbir nafakas\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n talep edilmi\u015f olup takip tarihinden sonra i\u015fleyen nafakalara y\u00f6nelik bir talep bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla an\u0131lan takip dosyas\u0131n\u0131n infaz oldu\u011funu, gerek \u00f6nceki takibin ilams\u0131z takip olmas\u0131 gerekse de infaz olmu\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u00f6nceki takip dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden takibe devam etme olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015flat\u0131lan takipte hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek
davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
\u0130LK<\/strong>DERECE<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>KARARI<\/strong>: Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131nda… 3.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/42 Esas 2018\/93 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 01\/03\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, nafaka, maddi ve manevi tazminat taleplerinin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi, bo\u015fanmaya ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn 01\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi, nafaka h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi ile muaccel hale gelece\u011fi, 01\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinden itibaren nafaka miktar\u0131n\u0131n 450,00 TL<\/strong> olarak belirlendi\u011fi, Y\u0130BK<\/strong> 2017\/2 E. 2017\/3 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 gere\u011fi ilaml\u0131 takiplerin ilams\u0131z takibe konu edilemeyece\u011fi… \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2019\/706 say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibin usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu kanaati olu\u015fmakla davan\u0131n reddine, ilaml\u0131 icrada icra inkar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden daval\u0131n\u0131n icra inkar tazminat\u0131 talebinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>SEBEPLER\u0130<\/strong>: Davac\u0131 vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, mahkemenin eldeki davay\u0131 ilam\u0131n ilams\u0131z takip yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle red karar\u0131 verdi\u011fini, ancak ilams\u0131z takibin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerel mahkemenin ara karar\u0131 ile h\u00fckmedilen tedbir nafakas\u0131 oldu\u011funu, tedbir nafakas\u0131 ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz edilmedi\u011fini, zaten yerel mahkemenin ara karar\u0131n\u0131n da ilam niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ilams\u0131z icra takibi ile ba\u015flat\u0131lan nafakay\u0131 m\u00fcvekkili d\u00fczenli olarak \u00f6demekte iken daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n devam eden nafaka dosyas\u0131 var iken yeniden yerel mahkeme ilam\u0131n\u0131 ilaml\u0131 icra konu edip m\u00fcvekkiline ek icra vekalet \u00fccreti ve masraflar do\u011furmamas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131n\u0131n devam eden nafaka dosyas\u0131na yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenli olarak halen de yat\u0131rmakta oldu\u011funu, burada amac\u0131n ilam\u0131n ilams\u0131z veya ilaml\u0131 icra takibi yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil m\u00fcvekkilini maddi a\u00e7\u0131dan zarara u\u011fratmak oldu\u011funu, zaten daval\u0131n\u0131n devam eden ilams\u0131z icra takibine m\u00fcvekkilinin yeni bir icra vekalet \u00fccreti ve masraflar \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in itiraz etmedi\u011fini, ayn\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinden yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131rmaya devam etti\u011fini belirterek mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong>:
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, ilaml\u0131 takipte takibin iptali talebine ili\u015fkindir.
Silifke \u0130cra Dairesinin 2019\/706 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; alacakl\u0131 Havva G\u00f6nen taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu … hakk\u0131nda 23\/01\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde ilamlar\u0131n icras\u0131 yoluyla birikmi\u015f 1.150,00 TL<\/strong> nafakan\u0131n ve ayl\u0131k i\u015fleyecek 450,00 TL<\/strong>‘nin tahsili i\u00e7in ilaml\u0131 takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
HUMK<\/strong>‘nin 443\/4. (HMK<\/strong>‘nin 367\/2.) maddesi gere\u011fince aile ve \u015fahs\u0131n hukuku ile ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler kesinle\u015fmedik\u00e7e takibe konu edilemez. Ayr\u0131ca, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n “eklentisi” olan (yoksulluk) ve (i\u015ftirak) nafakas\u0131 da ayn\u0131 kurala tabi olup, icra takibine konu edilebilmesi i\u00e7in bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi gerekir. Bir ba\u015fka anlat\u0131mla bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ise, eklentilerin (Yoksulluk nafakas\u0131, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, maddi ve manevi tazminat vs.) infaz edilmesi i\u00e7in karar\u0131n, eklentiler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de kesinle\u015fmesi gerekmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130lamda bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden itibaren nafakan\u0131n 100.00 TL<\/strong> artarak 450,00 TL<\/strong> yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 olarak devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihi olan 01\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinden takip tarihi olan 23\/01\/2019 <\/strong>tarihine kadar ki nafaka bedeli olan 1.150,00 TL<\/strong>‘nin talep edilmesinde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k yoktur.
Mahkemece ilamla h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n ilams\u0131z takip yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na ve ilaml\u0131 takipte icra inkar tazminat\u0131 verilemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7esinde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
Yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle; ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen istinaf sebepleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mahkemenin vaka ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesinde usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fck\u00fcmde kamu d\u00fczenine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 353\/1-b.1 maddesi gere\u011fince esastan reddine dair a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00fck\u00fcm hukuka uygun bulunmu\u015ftur.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;
Davac\u0131 vekilinin… \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 26\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarih 2019\/20 esas 2019\/33 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK<\/strong>‘nun 353\/1-b-1 maddesi gere\u011fince ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
Al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 54,40 TL<\/strong> istinaf karar harc\u0131ndan pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 44,40 TL<\/strong>‘nin mahsubu ile bakiye 10 TL<\/strong>‘nin davac\u0131dan tahsiline,
\u0130stinaf yoluna ba\u015fvuran taraf\u0131ndan istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan masraflar\u0131n istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvuran \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 333. maddesi gere\u011fince gider avans\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmayan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde yat\u0131rana iadesine,
Karar\u0131n taraflara tebli\u011fine,
Dair, dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 361 maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay’a temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere 12\/10\/2020 <\/strong>tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re yerinde bulunmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 5311 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u0130K<\/strong>‘nin 364\/2. maddesi g\u00f6ndermesiyle uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK<\/strong>‘nin 370. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA<\/strong>, al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 59,30 TL<\/strong> temyiz harc\u0131ndan, evvelce al\u0131nan har\u00e7 varsa mahsubu ile eksik harc\u0131n temyiz edenden tahsiline, 30\/03\/2021 <\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"