Esas No:2016\/7067<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong> \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya ait arac\u0131n, 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Manisa 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; tutana\u011f\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin \u00e7ok yetersiz olmas\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ticari nitelikte \u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin hi\u00e7bir tespit olmamas\u0131 ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finde ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ticari mahiyette oldu\u011funu ispatlar ba\u015fkaca delillerin de bulunmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; davac\u0131ya ait ara\u00e7la ilgili belediyeden izin veya ruhsat al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen personel ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 faaliyetinin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin delillerle ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2016\/7067Karar No:2018\/5830K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2016\/7067Karar No : 2018\/5830 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) : Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :Vekili : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya ait arac\u0131n, 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11006"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11006"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11006\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11007,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11006\/revisions\/11007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/5830<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2016\/7067
Karar No : 2018\/5830<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti : Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Manisa 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 05\/04\/2016 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2015\/1053, K:2016\/312 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 07\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n