Esas No:2016\/8456<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong> \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 34 TK<\/strong> 9946 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendi personelini ta\u015f\u0131ma i\u015finin ticari ama\u00e7l\u0131 yolcu ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ticari ama\u00e7l\u0131 yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle davaya konu arac\u0131n trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uygunluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle arac\u0131n trafikten ge\u00e7ici men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong> Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2016\/8456Karar No:2018\/5833K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2016\/8456Karar No : 2018\/5833 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :Vekili :Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 34 TK 9946 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11000"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11000"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11000\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11001,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11000\/revisions\/11001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/5833<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2016\/8456
Karar No : 2018\/5833<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :
Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti :Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
Dan\u0131\u015ftay Tetkik H\u00e2kimi : Abdulkadir \u00d6zkara
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce tetkik hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uyulmam\u0131\u015f olunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, temyiz isteminin reddine, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 26\/05\/2016 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2015\/1664; K:2016\/695 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere 07\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n