Esas No:2016\/848<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131lar) :<\/strong> 1- \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 \u015firkete ait 10 NJ<\/strong> 657 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 60 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine, davac\u0131 \u015firkete 2.400,00 TL<\/strong> idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ve di\u011fer davac\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc \u0130**** *** 2.400,00 TL<\/strong> idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemlerin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan sonucunda, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; D2 yetki belgesi uyar\u0131nca yurti\u00e7i ticari yolcu ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yapan davac\u0131 \u015firket hakk\u0131nda ilgili belediyeden izin veya ruhsat almaks\u0131z\u0131n, belediye s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 dahilinde ticari ama\u00e7l\u0131 yolcu ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemlerde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemlerin iptali yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2016\/848Karar No:2018\/5834K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2016\/848Karar No : 2018\/5834 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) : Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131lar) : 1-2-Vekilleri : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 \u015firkete ait 10 NJ 657 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 60 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine, davac\u0131 \u015firkete 2.400,00 TL idari para…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10998"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10998"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10998\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10999,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10998\/revisions\/10999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/5834<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2016\/848
Karar No : 2018\/5834<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2-
Vekilleri :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti : Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 02\/11\/2015 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2015\/517, K:2015\/1288 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 07\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n