Esas No:2016\/8860<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong> \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya ait 35 S 90487 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; yapt\u0131r\u0131ma konu ta\u015f\u0131man\u0131n Manisa B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde servis ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu yolunda a\u00e7\u0131k bir belirleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uygunluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2016\/8860Karar No:2018\/5836K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2016\/8860Karar No : 2018\/5836 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya ait 35 S 90487 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10994"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10994"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10995,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10994\/revisions\/10995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/5836<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2016\/8860
Karar No : 2018\/5836<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti : Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 20\/06\/2016 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2016\/122, K:2016\/511 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 07\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n