Esas No:2016\/8891<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong> Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong> \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n, 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flem ile ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcne 2.532,00 TL<\/strong> idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; arac\u0131n trafikten men edilmesi i\u015flemi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, davac\u0131 \u015firkete ait ara\u00e7 ile \u015firket temsilcisinin kendi \u00e7ocuk ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131k faaliyetinin \u00f6\u011frenci servis ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda bir ticari ta\u015f\u0131ma olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011finden, dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali, ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcne idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesi i\u015flemi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise davan\u0131n ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddi yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, iptale ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2016\/8891Karar No:2018\/5837K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2016\/8891Karar No : 2018\/5837 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :Vekili : Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :Vekili : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n, 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 Karayollar\u0131 Trafik Kanunu’nun Ek 2\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle trafikten men edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flem ile ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcne 2.532,00 TL idari…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10992"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10992"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10992\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10993,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10992\/revisions\/10993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/5837<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2016\/8891
Karar No : 2018\/5837<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti : Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Kocaeli 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 25\/05\/2016 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2016\/293, K:2016\/686 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptale ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 07\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n