Esas No:2013\/9215<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong> Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong> M\u00fcdahil (Daval\u0131 Yan\u0131nda) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, baca\u011f\u0131nda meydana gelen t\u00fcm\u00f6re erken te\u015fhis konulamamas\u0131nda idarenin hizmet kusuru bulundu\u011fundan bahisle 50.000,00 TL<\/strong> manevi zarar\u0131n \u00f6denmesine dair ba\u015fvurusunun reddine ili\u015fkin 18.02.2010 <\/strong>tarih ve 6862 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin iptali ile talep edilen 50.000,00 TL<\/strong> manevi tazminat\u0131n faiziyle birlikte \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Bursa 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; ki\u015filerin, idarenin eylemi nedeniyle u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 zarar\u0131n tazminine ili\u015fkin tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7madan evvel ald\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 \u00f6n karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lacak tam yarg\u0131 davalar\u0131nda iptale konu etmelerine olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davan\u0131n iptale ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n incelenme olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n 18.02.2010 <\/strong>tarih ve 6862 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin iptaline y\u00f6nelik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n incelenmeksizin, tazminata ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ise, A**** *** Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde d\u00fczenlenen raporda, ilk olarak 14.10.2009 <\/strong>tarihinde sol uyluk arka y\u00fczde kitle tespit edildi\u011fi, gerekli sevk ve tetkik i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ki\u015fide mevcut lomber disk hernisi ile sol uylukta ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sarkomun farkl\u0131 hastal\u0131klar oldu\u011fu, illiyetlerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, uygulanan tan\u0131 ve tedavi y\u00f6ntemlerinin t\u0131p kurallar\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu ve hizmet kusuru bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tespitlere yer verildi\u011fi, bu haliyle meydana gelen zarar\u0131n olu\u015fumunda idareye atf\u0131 kabil hizmet kusuru bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle esastan reddi yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Savunmalar\u0131n \u00d6zeti :Daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu, temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi savunulmaktad\u0131r. M\u00fcdahil taraf\u0131ndan savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dcye<\/p>\n\n\n\n (X)<\/p>\n\n\n\n KAR\u015eI<\/strong>OY<\/strong>(X):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 659 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 14. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda, Tahkim usul\u00fcne tabi olanlar dahil adli ve idari davalar ile icra dairelerinde idarelerin vekili s\u0131fat\u0131yla hukuk birimi amirleri, muhakemat m\u00fcd\u00fcrleri, hukuk m\u00fc\u015favirleri ve avukatlar taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan takip ve duru\u015fmalar i\u00e7in, bu davalar\u0131n idareler lehine neticelenmesi halinde, bunlar taraf\u0131ndan temsil ve takip edilen dava ve i\u015flerde ilgili mevzuata g\u00f6re h\u00fckmedilmesi gereken tutar \u00fczerinden idareler lehine vekalet \u00fccreti takdir edilir. h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almakla birlikte, an\u0131lan KHK<\/strong>‘nin 2.11.2011 tarihli Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yay\u0131m\u0131 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu tarihten sonra a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalarda, avukat ile takip edilecek davalar i\u00e7in vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilebilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u00dcye<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2013\/9215Karar No:2018\/6064K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2013\/9215Karar No : 2018\/6064 Temyiz Eden (Davac\u0131) :Vekili : Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Daval\u0131) :Vekilleri : M\u00fcdahil (Daval\u0131 Yan\u0131nda) : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, baca\u011f\u0131nda meydana gelen t\u00fcm\u00f6re erken te\u015fhis konulamamas\u0131nda idarenin hizmet kusuru bulundu\u011fundan bahisle 50.000,00 TL manevi zarar\u0131n \u00f6denmesine dair ba\u015fvurusunun reddine ili\u015fkin 18.02.2010 tarih…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10976"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10976"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10976\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10977,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10976\/revisions\/10977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/6064<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2013\/9215
Karar No : 2018\/6064<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekilleri :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Bursa 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 29\/03\/2013 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2010\/335, K:2013\/287 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 26\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bak\u0131lan davada, davan\u0131n 23.03.2010 <\/strong>tarihinde yani 659 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK<\/strong>‘nin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakta olup, daval\u0131 idare lehine vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesine olanak bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
Bu nedenle, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 idare lehine vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesine ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bu gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle karar\u0131n bu k\u0131sm\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n