Esas No:2013\/7078<\/strong> T.C. Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :<\/strong> Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) :<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya, 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 102.maddesi uyar\u0131nca 82.237,50 TL<\/strong> idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine dair i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin 28.06.2011 <\/strong>tarih ve 2011\/63 \u0130tiraz Komisyonu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda, Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nce; davac\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen ki\u015filerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kimlik ildirimleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda somut bir bilgi ve belge bulunnmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fiili bir tespit yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan eksik incelemeye dayal\u0131 olarak tesis edilen idari para cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolunda verilen karar\u0131n, hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. T\u00dcRK<\/strong>M\u0130LLET\u0130<\/strong>ADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onbe\u015finci Dairesi’nce, Tetkik Hakiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlenip, dosyadaki belgeler incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: T.C.Dan\u0131\u015ftay15. Daire Esas No:2013\/7078Karar No:2018\/6130K. Tarihi: T.C.D A N I \u015e T A YONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130DA\u0130REEsas No : 2013\/7078Karar No : 2018\/6130 Temyiz Eden (Daval\u0131) :Vekili : Kar\u015f\u0131 Taraf (Davac\u0131) : \u0130stemin \u00d6zeti : Davac\u0131ya, 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 102.maddesi uyar\u0131nca 82.237,50 TL idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesine dair i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin 28.06.2011 tarih ve 2011\/63 \u0130tiraz Komisyonu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[67],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10969"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10969"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10969\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10970,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10969\/revisions\/10970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2018\/6130<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
D A N I \u015e T A Y
ONBE\u015e\u0130NC\u0130<\/strong>DA\u0130RE<\/strong>
Esas No : 2013\/7078
Karar No : 2018\/6130<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vekili :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savunman\u0131n \u00d6zeti : Savunma verilmemi\u015ftir.
D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi : Temyiz isteminin reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun Karar\u0131n Bozulmas\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 49. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; temyiz incelemesi sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n; a) G\u00f6rev ve yetki d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir i\u015fe bak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, b) Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar verilmesi, c) Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131nda karar\u0131 etkileyebilecek nitelikte hata veya eksikliklerin bulunmas\u0131 sebeplerinden dolay\u0131 incelenen karar\u0131 bozaca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.
Dosyadaki belgeler ile temyiz dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n incelenmesinden, temyiz istemine konu karar\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek yasal bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; temyiz isteminin reddine, Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 06\/09\/2012 <\/strong>tarih ve E:2011\/1417, K:2012\/805 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ONANMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 18.06.2014 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 8. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 54. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f tarihini izleyen g\u00fcnden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 28\/06\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"