Esas No:2018\/2135<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi8. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2018\/2135Karar No:2019\/345K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret MahkemesiTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 19\/07\/2018<br>NUMARASI : 2018\/5004 D.\u0130\u015f, 2018\/5004 K.DAVANINKONUSU: Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n Tebli\u011fe \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \/ Saklanmas\u0131\u0130ST\u0130NAFKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 21\/02\/2019<br>Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;GERE\u011e\u0130D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonunda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.Sigorta…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10957"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10957"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10958,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10957\/revisions\/10958"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/345<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 19\/07\/2018<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2018\/5004 D.\u0130\u015f, 2018\/5004 K.
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n Tebli\u011fe \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \/ Saklanmas\u0131
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 21\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc:
Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonunda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.
Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince ba\u015fvuru sahibinin talebinin kabul\u00fc ile, 125.774,27-TL<\/strong>‘nin 12\/11\/2015 <\/strong>tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte sigorta \u015firketinden al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015f, daval\u0131 … vekilinin Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetine itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine; itiraz hakem heyetince, itiraz\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k hakem heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 103.213,16-TL<\/strong> tazminat\u0131n 12\/11\/2015 <\/strong>tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte …ndan al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurana verilmesine ve fazlaya ili\u015fen talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, davac\u0131 vekili ve daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran … vekili, 10\/10\/2018 <\/strong>g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7e ile istinaf iste\u011finden vazge\u00e7tiklerini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015ftirilmesini talep etmi\u015f; istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran davac\u0131 vekili de Uyap’tan g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 06\/02\/2019 <\/strong>g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7e ile daval\u0131 kurumla yapt\u0131klar\u0131 protokol uyar\u0131nca, kendilerinin de istinaf talebinden vazge\u00e7tiklerini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stinaf iste\u011finde bulunan taraf vekillerinin vekaletnamelerinde, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131ndan feragat etme yetkileri bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, HMK<\/strong>.349\/2 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, daval\u0131 … vekilinin ve davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf isteklerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 feragat nedeniyle reddi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131larak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilmi\u015ftir.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong>: Gerek\u00e7e uyar\u0131nca;
1-Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetinin 27\/06\/2018 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 2018\/\u0130.4373- 2018\/\u0130HK<\/strong>.5293 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 … vekili ve davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n, istinaftan feragat etmeleri nedeniyle HMK<\/strong>.m.349\/2 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuru s\u0131ras\u0131nda daval\u0131 … Hesab\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 pe\u015fin olarak yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan 35,90 TL<\/strong> maktu karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n talepleri halinde kendilerine ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 \u0130ADES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
3-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran taraflarca istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan di\u011fer giderlerin takdiren \u00fczerlerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
4-\u0130ncelemenin duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
HMK<\/strong>. m. 349\/2 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ve HMK<\/strong>. m. 361. gere\u011fince, tebli\u011fden itibaren 2 hafta i\u00e7inde Yarg\u0131tay nezdinde temyiz yasa yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.21\/02\/2019.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"