Esas No:2019\/404<\/strong> T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi36. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2019\/404Karar No:2019\/356K. Tarihi: T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A\u0130 S T \u0130 N A F K A R A R I\u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130STANBUL 9. ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 03\/08\/2018<br>NUMARASI : 2018\/809 E. – 2018\/817 K.\u0130ST\u0130NAFYOLUNABA\u015eVURANDAVANINKONUSU: \u0130htiyati HacizKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 25\/02\/2019<br>\u0130stinaf incelemesi i\u00e7in dairemize g\u00f6nderilen dosyadaki t\u00fcm belgeler ve dairemiz \u00fcyesi…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10953"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10953"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10954,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10953\/revisions\/10954"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/356<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130 S T \u0130 N A F K A R A R I
\u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong>
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130STANBUL<\/strong> 9. ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 03\/08\/2018<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2018\/809 E. – 2018\/817 K.
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>YOLUNA<\/strong>
BA\u015eVURAN<\/strong>
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: \u0130htiyati Haciz
KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 25\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>\u0130stinaf incelemesi i\u00e7in dairemize g\u00f6nderilen dosyadaki t\u00fcm belgeler ve dairemiz \u00fcyesi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan raporlar incelendi.
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc:
\u0130htiyati haciz talep eden vekili dilek\u00e7esinde; … Bankas\u0131 Osmanbey\/ \u0130stanbul \u015eubesi, … IBAN<\/strong> no’lu, … \u00e7ek no’lu, 15\/05\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ve 70.000,00 TL<\/strong> bedelli 1 adet \u00e7ekin bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkil \u015firkete devir cirosuyla tevdi edildi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ekin tahsili i\u00e7in muhatap bankaya ibraz edildi\u011fini ancak \u00e7ekin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkil me\u015fru son hamil oldu\u011funu, bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan bug\u00fcne kadar herhangi bir \u00f6demede bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve m\u00fctemerrit duruma d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, alaca\u011f\u0131n muaccel olmas\u0131 ve \u0130\u0130K<\/strong>‘nun 257. madde \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131 verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.\u0130lk derece mahkemesince; \u0130\u0130K<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 257\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re %15 teminat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun mal, hak ve alacaklar\u0131ndan borca yetecek miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanununun koydu\u011fu s\u0131n\u0131rlar i\u00e7inde ihtiyaten haczine karar verilmi\u015ftir.Bor\u00e7lu vekili itiraz dilek\u00e7esi ile; m\u00fcvekkili ile kar\u015f\u0131 taraf aras\u0131nda Sapphire AVM<\/strong>‘nin \u00f6n cephesinde yer alan Led Reklam Alan\u0131’n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan reklam amac\u0131yla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin 30\/08\/2013 <\/strong>tarihinde Reklam Yeri Gelir Payla\u015f\u0131m S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, 06\/09\/2017 <\/strong>tarihli mutabakat ile s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 15\/09\/2017 <\/strong>tarihinden itibaren 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan … Bankas\u0131’n\u0131n 29\/08\/2013 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli, … nolu, 122.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli, .. nolu, 122.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli ve …nolu, 122.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli 3 adet teminat \u00e7ekini ke\u015fide olunarak kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa verildi\u011fini ve s\u00f6zkonusu \u00e7eklerin halen kar\u015f\u0131 taraf davac\u0131 \u015firket uhdesinde oldu\u011funu, ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131n olumsuz etkileri sebebiyle Sapphire AVM<\/strong> uzun s\u00fcredir b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda bo\u015f oldu\u011funu, 06\/09\/2017 <\/strong>tarihinde s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00fcresinin uzat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra daha fazla ma\u011faz\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun m\u00fcvekkili a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ciddi gelir kayb\u0131na sebebiyet vererek s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili aleyhinde de\u011fi\u015fmesi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin devam\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilmez hale gelmesi sonucu do\u011furdu\u011funu, bu do\u011frultuda Beyo\u011flu … Noterli\u011fi’nin 20\/04\/2018 <\/strong>tarih ve …yevmiye nolu ihtarname ile davac\u0131 tarafa ihtarnamenin tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren 3 i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde Asgari Gelir Bedelinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve teminat \u00e7ekleri ile hen\u00fcz vadesi gelmemi\u015f \u00e7eklerin iade edilmesinin ihtar olundu\u011funu, davac\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan Beyo\u011flu …. Noterli\u011fi kanal\u0131yla ihtarnameye olumsuz cevap verildi\u011fi, yine m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan Beyo\u011flu … Noterli\u011fi’nin 27\/04\/2018 <\/strong>tarih ve … yevmiye nolu ihtarname s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshedildi\u011fi ve \u00e7eklerin 1 i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde iade edilmesinin ihtar edildi\u011fini, bu do\u011frultuda taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan feshedildi\u011fini, i\u015f bu fesih i\u015flemini takiben s\u00f6zkonusu reklam alan\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015fiye yeniden kiralanmas\u0131 m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen fesihin davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a z\u0131mnen kab\u00fcl\u00fc anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fini, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede davac\u0131 \u015firket yeddinde bulunan s\u0131ral\u0131 \u00e7eklerin de dayanaks\u0131z ve konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahkememiz davas\u0131na konu \u00e7ek i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul 12. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2018\/483 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile di\u011fer \u00e7ek i\u00e7in ise \u0130stanbul 14. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2018\/620 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile m\u00fcvekkili \u015firketin bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti z\u0131mn\u0131nda menfi tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, mahkemece verilen ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.Alacakl\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile; ihtiyati hacze itiraz edenin, ihtiyati hacze konu \u00e7ek hakk\u0131nda menfi tespit davas\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle ihtiyati haciz talebinin sadece bu dosyadan talep edebilece\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kald\u0131 ki bahsedilen dosyadan taraflar\u0131na herhangi bir tebligat yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davadan huzurdaki dosyaya yap\u0131lan itirazla haberdar olduklar\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca huzurdaki davan\u0131n konusu olmasa da taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re her t\u00fcrl\u00fc fesih ve sona erme halinde davac\u0131, asgari gelir taahh\u00fcd\u00fc bedelinin tamam\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011funu, i\u015f bu sebeple davac\u0131n\u0131n, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi \u00fczerine verilen \u00e7eklerin konusuz ve dayanaks\u0131z kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemeyece\u011fini belirterek ihtiyati hacze itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini, t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lama masraflar\u0131 ile vekalet \u00fccretinin kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa y\u00fckletilmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.\u0130lk derece mahkemesince, ihtiyati hacze itiraz nedenleri \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 265. vd. maddelerinde yetkiye, teminata ve ihtiyati haczin verili\u015f nedenine olmak \u00fczere tahdidi \u015fekilde say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen hususlar\u0131n \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 265. md.belirtilen itiraz nedenlerinden olmay\u0131p menfi tespit davas\u0131na konu olaca\u011f\u0131ndan ihtiyati hacze itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u0130htiyati Hacze itiraz eden vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ; 06\/09\/2017 <\/strong>tarihli mutabakat ile s\u0131ral\u0131 \u00e7ekler ke\u015fide olunarak davac\u0131ya verildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 aleyhine de\u011fi\u015fmesi nedeniyle s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin devam\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilmez hale geldi\u011fini, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshedildi\u011fini ,bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede davac\u0131 \u015firket nezdinde bulunan s\u0131ral\u0131 \u00e7eklerinde dayanaks\u0131z ve konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ,bu \u00e7ekler i\u00e7in menfi tespit davalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ,davalar\u0131n derdest oldu\u011funu belirterek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.Dava; ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakl\u0131 olarak verilen senetten dolay\u0131 ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 4\/1-a maddesinde Sulh Hukuk Mahkemeleri, dava konusunun de\u011fer veya tutar\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n; kiralanan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n, 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanun’una g\u00f6re ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla tahliyesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler ayr\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, kira ili\u015fkisinden do\u011fan alacak davalar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131 konu alan davalar ile bu davalara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcrler. h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.\u0130ncelenen dosyada davac\u0131 \u015firket ile daval\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda 30\/08\/2013 <\/strong>tarihli Reklam Yeri Gelir Payla\u015f\u0131m S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi mevcut oldu\u011fu hususunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ihtiyati hacze itiraz edenin bu kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayanarak d\u00fczenledi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi \u00e7ekler hakk\u0131nda ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131 verilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k kira ili\u015fkisinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan HMK<\/strong> n\u0131n 4\/1-a maddesi gere\u011fince davaya bakmak g\u00f6revi Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesine ait olup, ilk derece mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev hususunu de\u011ferlendirmeden ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131 vermesi ve itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup; istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun H.M.K’nun 353\/1-b-2 maddesi gere\u011fince karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve ilk derece mahkemesinin g\u00f6revsiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ihtiyati haciz ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong> : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;
1-Davac\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n H.M.K’nun 353\/1-b-2 maddesi gere\u011fince kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, dairemizce yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak;
2-Davac\u0131n\u0131n ihtiyati haciz talebinin g\u00f6revsiz mahkemeden talep edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
3-\u0130htiyati haciz karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda yat\u0131r\u0131lan istinaf maktu karar harc\u0131n\u0131n talebi halinde iadesine,
4-\u0130htiyati haciz karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edenin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 23.50 TL<\/strong> yarg\u0131lama giderinin ihtiyati haciz talep edenden al\u0131narak ihtiyati haciz karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edene verilmesine, harcanmayan istinaf gider avans\u0131n\u0131n ilgilisine iadesine
5-Har\u00e7 takibi, avans iadesi ve karar tebli\u011fi i\u015flemlerinin ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yerine getirilmesine,
Dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda HMK<\/strong>‘nun 362\/1-f maddesi gere\u011fince kesin olarak oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.25\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"