Esas No:2017\/2718<\/strong> T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi19. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2017\/2718Karar No:2019\/361K. Tarihi: T \u00dc R K M \u0130 L L E T \u0130 A D I N A\u0130 S T \u0130 N A F K A R A R I\u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret MahkemesiTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 02\/09\/2016<br>NUMARASI : 2015\/590 Esas – 2016\/666 KararDAVANINKONUSU: AlacakKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 11\/02\/2019<br>\u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 02\/09\/2016 tarihli,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10951"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10951"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10951\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10952,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10951\/revisions\/10952"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/361<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130 S T \u0130 N A F K A R A R I
\u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong>
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 02\/09\/2016<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2015\/590 Esas – 2016\/666 Karar
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: Alacak
KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 11\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>\u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 02\/09\/2016 <\/strong>tarihli, 2015\/590 Esas, 2016\/666 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda verilen karar istinaf incelemesi i\u00e7in dairemize tevzi edilmekle Dairemiz yukar\u0131da belirtilen esas s\u0131ras\u0131na kayd\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131.
Dosya incelendi.
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle, daval\u0131 \u015firketin eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131ndan …’in davac\u0131 \u015firket ve daval\u0131lar aleyhine a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu tazminat davas\u0131nda; \u0130stanbul A**** *** \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nin 2013\/554 esas 2013\/511 karar say\u0131l\u0131 olarak verilen kararda davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fini; h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan alacak kalemlerine istinaden \u0130stanbul A**** *** M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn … say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in 17.132,39 TL<\/strong>‘lik icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; 02\/05\/2014 <\/strong>tarihinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dosya borcunun 4 e\u015fit taksitte \u00f6denmesinin taahh\u00fct edildi\u011fini ve borcun da bilahare \u00f6dendi\u011fini; aradan bir y\u0131ldan uzun zaman ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131lardan …. Ltd. \u015eti’nin sorumlulu\u011fundaki 4.243,227 TL<\/strong> daval\u0131lardan …nin sorumlulu\u011fundaki 3.623,652 TL<\/strong> daval\u0131lardan DS\u0130<\/strong> Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn sorumlulu\u011fundaki 5.596,092 TL<\/strong>‘yi davac\u0131ya \u00f6demedi\u011fini; bu nedenlerle, daval\u0131lardan bu miktarlar\u0131n \u00f6deme tarihlerinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek ticari faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsiline karar verilmesini; talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 DS\u0130<\/strong> vekilince verilen davaya cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davada g\u00f6revli mahkemenin i\u015f mahkemesi oldu\u011funu; bu nedenle dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6revli i\u015f mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesini; ayr\u0131ca, as\u0131l i\u015fveren olan idare aleyhine alt i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan r\u00fccu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren bir mevzuat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; bu nedenle, husumetin idareye y\u00f6neltilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu; davan\u0131n idare a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddi gerekti\u011fini; ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6deme yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da icra dosyas\u0131 celp edilerek tesbitinin gerekti\u011fini; alt i\u015fverenin as\u0131l i\u015fverene r\u00fccu hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; ancak, dava tarihinden itibaren yasal faiz talep edilece\u011fini; bu nedenlerle, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini; talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 … Ltd. \u015eti vekilince verilen davaya cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131 ilamda belirtilen tutar\u0131n hepsini \u00f6dedi\u011finden bahisle i\u015f bu r\u00fccu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ise de; kararda, daval\u0131 … Ltd. \u015eti’nin sorumlu oldu\u011fu tutar davaya konu Personel … taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 \u015firket aleyhine ayr\u0131ca \u0130stanbul A**** *** M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn … say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden ilaml\u0131 icraya konu edildi\u011fini; daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan icraya konu ilam temyiz edildi\u011finden tehiri icra karar\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; karar\u0131n, hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n, daval\u0131 . … Ltd. \u015eti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6ncelikle derdestlik itiraz\u0131ndan usulden reddi gerekti\u011fini; davada; daval\u0131 \u015firketin taraf s\u0131fat\u0131 da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n husumet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddi gerekti\u011fini; davada g\u00f6revli mahkemenin i\u015f mahkemesi oldu\u011funu; ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n, r\u00fccuya konu alaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6dedi\u011fini ispatlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini; r\u00fccu davas\u0131na konu karar\u0131n temyiz edildi\u011finden kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini; daval\u0131 \u015firketin \u0130\u015f Kanunun 6.maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015fyerini devretti\u011fi tarihten itibaren 2 y\u0131l ge\u00e7ti\u011finden sorumlulu\u011funun sona erdi\u011fini; bu nedenle, davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131ya r\u00fccu hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan talep edilen miktar\u0131nda fahi\u015f oldu\u011fundan reddi gerekti\u011fini; bu nedenlerle haks\u0131z ve mesnetsiz davan\u0131n reddine; karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015fir. Daval\u0131 … … A.\u015e vekilince verilen davaya cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle;\u0130stanbul A**** *** Mahkemesi’nin 2013\/554 esas say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011funu hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini; bu nedenle, kesinle\u015fmeyen bir mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayan\u0131larak a\u00e7\u0131lan bu davan\u0131n dayanaktan yoksun bulundu\u011funu; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan di\u011fer daval\u0131lar\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 al\u0131nmadan taahh\u00fcd\u00fcne dayal\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demeleri kabul etmediklerini; davac\u0131 ve di\u011fer daval\u0131 DS\u0130<\/strong>‘nin i\u015f kanununa ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakk\u0131 olmayan nedenlerden dolay\u0131 feshetmesinden daval\u0131ya sorumluluk y\u00fcklenmesinin hukukun genel ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu; daval\u0131 \u015firketin durumunun \u0130\u015f Kanunun 6.maddesine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesinin gerekti\u011fini; daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu\u011funun devir tarihinden 2 y\u0131l sonra yani 31\/12\/2013 <\/strong>tarihinde sona erdi\u011fini; bu nedenlerle, haks\u0131z ve mesnetsiz davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini; talep etmi\u015ftir.\u0130stinafa konu karar, \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinin 02\/09\/2016 <\/strong>tarihli 2015\/590 Esas, 2016\/666 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 DS\u0130<\/strong> Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine, Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar … G\u00fcvenlik Sistemleri ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti ve …aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile, 3.696,18 TL<\/strong>‘nin daval\u0131 … G\u00fcvenlik Sistemleri ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti’den, 3.623,65 TL<\/strong>‘nin daval\u0131 …den, Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n her bir 1\/4’l\u00fck b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in s\u0131ras\u0131yla 05\/05\/2014,<\/strong>05\/06\/2014,<\/strong>04\/07\/2014 <\/strong>ve 07\/08\/2014 <\/strong>\u00f6deme tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan tahsili ile davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine, fazlaya ili\u015fkin istemin reddine, y\u00f6nelik karar\u0131d\u0131r. Daval\u0131 … … A.\u015e vekili, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 di\u011fer alt i\u015fverenin m\u00fcvekkilinin r\u0131zas\u0131 ve bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6deme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin kendisinden talep edilemeyece\u011fini, DS\u0130<\/strong>‘nin \u0130\u015f Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayanmaks\u0131z\u0131n feshetti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin konumunun \u0130\u015f Kanunun 6. Maddesine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini, bu durumda da m\u00fcvekkiline kar\u015f\u0131 r\u00fccu talebinde bulunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.
GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong> : Dava alt i\u015fveren davac\u0131n\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin icra takibine konu etti\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7i alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demesi nedeniyle as\u0131l i\u015fverenden ve di\u011fer alt i\u015fverenlerden \u00f6dedi\u011fi bedeli r\u00fccuen talep etti\u011fi alacak davas\u0131d\u0131r.
Taraflar aras\u0131nda, alt i\u015f veren ve \u00fcst i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinin bulundu\u011fu hususunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, alt i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demesi halinde bunun di\u011fer alt i\u015fverenlerden ve as\u0131l i\u015fverenden talep edip edemeyece\u011fi ve r\u00fcceun talep edece\u011fi miktar\u0131n ne olaca\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer alt i\u015fverenin sorumlulu\u011funun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131ndad\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince, icra dosyas\u0131, \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi dosyas\u0131 celp edilmi\u015f taraflar\u0131n iddia ve savunmalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda da bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince, as\u0131l i\u015f veren y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine, alt i\u015f verenler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nem esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince, toplanan deliller, al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi rapor i\u00e7eri\u011fi birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, alt i\u015fverenin icra takibinde \u00f6demi\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n, di\u011fer alt i\u015fverenlerden \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nem esas al\u0131narak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131ndan sadece son alt i\u015fveren konumundaki davac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011fu ve bu i\u015f\u00e7i alacaklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden r\u00fccu talebinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise, alt i\u015fverenler yan\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan s\u00fcrenin esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Rapor i\u00e7eri\u011finde de, t\u00fcm i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden alt i\u015fverenlerin sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlendi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle daval\u0131 alt i\u015fverenin sorumlulu\u011fu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki istinaf talebi yerinde de\u011fildir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan t\u00fcm bu nedenlerle a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve yasalara uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong>: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle:
Dairemiz ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 hem maddi olay hem de hukuka uygunluk bak\u0131m\u0131ndan incelemeye tabii tutarak yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu istinaf incelemesinde; \u0130stinafa konu karar\u0131n usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan HMK<\/strong> 353\/1-b maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
\u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in yat\u0131r\u0131lan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n mahsubuyla bakiye 153,92 TL<\/strong> harc\u0131n hazine ad\u0131na daval\u0131 … …. A.\u015e.’den ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan tahsiline,
Davan\u0131n ve dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131laman\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve avukatl\u0131k asgari \u00fccret tarifesi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak aleyhine istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulan i\u00e7in vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
\u0130stinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuran daval\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, artan k\u0131sm\u0131n talep halinde ilk derece mahkemesince yat\u0131rana iadesine,
Dair; dosya \u00fczerinde, taraflar\u0131n ve vekillerin yoklu\u011funda oy birli\u011fi ile KES\u0130N<\/strong> olarak verilen karar, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okundu. 11\/02\/2019O<\/strong>sman K\u0130PER<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"