Esas No:2019\/236<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi16. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2019\/236Karar No:2019\/365K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130STANBULANADOLU 5. ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 10\/07\/2018<br>NUMARASI : 2015\/157 E. – 2018\/718 K.DAVANINKONUSU: \u0130tiraz\u0131n \u0130ptali (Ticari Sat\u0131mdan Kaynaklanan)KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130: 20\/02\/2019<br>\u0130stinaf incelemesi i\u00e7in dairemize g\u00f6nderilen dosyan\u0131n ilk incelemesi tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olmakla, HMK 353. ve 356. maddeleri gere\u011fince dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmeden dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu;G E R E \u011e \u0130 D \u00dc \u015e \u00dc…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10949"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10949"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10950,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10949\/revisions\/10950"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/365<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130STANBUL<\/strong>ANADOLU<\/strong> 5. ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 10\/07\/2018<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2015\/157 E. – 2018\/718 K.
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: \u0130tiraz\u0131n \u0130ptali (Ticari Sat\u0131mdan Kaynaklanan)
KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 20\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>\u0130stinaf incelemesi i\u00e7in dairemize g\u00f6nderilen dosyan\u0131n ilk incelemesi tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olmakla, HMK<\/strong> 353. ve 356. maddeleri gere\u011fince dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmeden dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu;
G E R E \u011e \u0130 D \u00dc \u015e \u00dc N \u00dc L D \u00dc :
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; taraflar aras\u0131nda i\u015f ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi akdedildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fme i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131 ortak olarak m\u00fcvekkil taraf\u0131ndan 100.000,00 TL<\/strong> \u00f6denmesine karar verildi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00fczerine d\u00fc\u015fen edimini yerine getirdi\u011fini, bedelin daval\u0131n\u0131n bizzat hesab\u0131na g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin D bendi 4. b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131 ortak taraf\u0131ndan projeye verilen 100.000,00 TL<\/strong> kat\u0131l\u0131m sermayesine ilave olarak projenin net gelirinden % 20 pay nakit olarak \u00f6denece\u011finin h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve talep haklar\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 tutuldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin D bendi 4A b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ilk kat\u0131l\u0131m tutan olan 100.000,00 TL<\/strong>‘nin s\u00f6zle\u015fme bitim tarihi olan 24\/09\/2014 <\/strong>tarihinden sonra 4 ay i\u00e7inde kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131 orta\u011fa nakit olarak \u00f6denmesinin kararla\u015ft\u0131nld\u0131\u011f\u0131m, yat\u0131r\u0131lan kat\u0131l\u0131m tutann\u0131n iade edilmedi\u011fini, daval\u0131 aleyhinde \u0130stanbul A**** *** \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn … say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine itiraz etti\u011fini ve takibin durdu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130stanbul A**** *** \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn … say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik haks\u0131z itiraz\u0131n\u0131n iptaline, takibin devam\u0131na, daval\u0131n\u0131n %20 den a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamak \u00fczere icra inkar tazminat\u0131na mahkum edilmesine karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131 ile aras\u0131nda herhangi bir ticari anla\u015fma bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin …’e verilen muvafakatnamenin kapsam\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ge\u00e7erlilik \u015fart\u0131 yerine getirilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in hukuken yok durumda oldu\u011funu, …’\u00fcn yap\u0131mc\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla bulundu\u011funu, muvafakatnameye ra\u011fmen bilgi verilmedi\u011fi gibi ad\u0131na bor\u00e7lanma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yasa gere\u011fi bor\u00e7lanma yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca bor\u00e7lanma yapma yetkisi verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, muvafakatnamede bor\u00e7lanma yetkisi verildi\u011fine dair bir ibare olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m, …’\u00fcn banka hesaplar\u0131nda s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar oldu\u011funu bildirerek kendisinden \u0130\u015f Bankas\u0131 Metropol \u015fubesinde t\u00fcketici kredisi almadan dolay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan ve sadece kredi taksitini \u00f6demekte kullan\u0131lan hesab\u0131n IBAN<\/strong> numaras\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n bankamatik kart\u0131 ile birlikte IBAN<\/strong> numaras\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fini, bu hesaba gelen ve sponsorluk i\u00e7in geldi\u011fi ifade edilen paray\u0131 tamamen …’\u00fcn kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.\u0130stanbul A**** *** Ticaret Mahkemesinin 10.07.2018 <\/strong>tarihli 2017\/158 E., 2018\/718 K.say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, \u0130stanbul A**** *** \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn … say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda; daval\u0131n\u0131n 100.000,00 TL<\/strong> as\u0131l alaca\u011fa y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile takibin bu miktar \u00fczerinden devam\u0131na, as\u0131l alacak 100.000,00 TL<\/strong> ye takip tarihinden itibaren y\u0131ll\u0131k 10.50 ve de\u011fi\u015fen oranlarda avans faizi uygulanmas\u0131na, alaca\u011f\u0131n likit oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kabul edilen as\u0131l alacak \u00fczerinden hesaplanan %20 \u0130cra inkar tazminat\u0131 tutar\u0131 20.000,00 TL<\/strong> nin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekilinin, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; mahkemenin yetkisiz oldu\u011funu, Mersin Mahkemelerinin yetkili oldu\u011funu, bilirki\u015fi raporunun h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmaya elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan …’e verilen muvafakatnamenin \u015farta ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131na ve \u015fart\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesine ra\u011fmen muvafakat\u0131n ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funun kabul edildi\u011fini, BK<\/strong> h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re bu muvafakat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 i\u015flem yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 i\u015flem i\u00e7in yetki verilmedi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede a\u00e7\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm bulundu\u011funu beyanla mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.
GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong>:
\u0130tiraz\u0131n iptaline konu davada, davac\u0131 alacakl\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun Mersin …Noterli\u011finin 20.09.2013 <\/strong>tarihli muvafakatnamesi ile daval\u0131 …’e verilen yetki ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda 24.09.2013 <\/strong>tarihli i\u015f ortakl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re de m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131ya 100.000 TL<\/strong> kat\u0131l\u0131m sermayesi \u00f6dedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dosyaya \u00f6rne\u011fi sunulan muvaffakatname – tah\u00fctname ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 belge de … isimli … Film seneryosunun hert\u00fcrl\u00fc hakl\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak ko\u015fuluyla \u015fahs\u0131 ad\u0131na yap\u0131m ve ticari gelirleri ile ilgili sponsor ve di\u011fer t\u00fcm resmi ve \u00f6zel kurum, kurulu\u015f, \u015firket ve \u015fah\u0131slarla hert\u00fcrl\u00fc anla\u015fma yapma yetkisinin yapaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015fmalar\u0131n bilgisini kendisine …com adresine vermek suretiyle film yap\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131… TC<\/strong> kimlik nolu … taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, muvaffakatinin oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dosyaya \u00f6rnek sunulan 24.09.2013 <\/strong>tarihli i\u015f ortakl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde; … adl\u0131 uzun metrajl\u0131 ticari ama\u00e7l\u0131 sinema filminin \u00e7ekilmesi projesi i\u00e7in i\u015f ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraflar\u0131n edimlerinin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Muvafakatnamenin ve i\u015f ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi konusunun seneryosu davac\u0131ya ait oldu\u011fu bildirilen … adl\u0131 sinema filmi oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n muvafakatname ile dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 …’e hangi haklar\u0131n\u0131 devretti\u011fi, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan i\u015f ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan sorumlulu\u011funun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve varsa sorumlulu\u011funun tespitinin 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 FSEK<\/strong> h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tespiti gerekti\u011fi, 5846 Say\u0131l\u0131 FSEK<\/strong> 76. Madde gere\u011fince bu kanunun d\u00fczenledi\u011fi hukuki ili\u015fkilerden kaynaklanan davalar\u0131n ihtisas mahkemesi olan Fikri S\u0131nai Haklar Hukuk Mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi, mahkemenin g\u00f6revli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgili oldu\u011fu, re’sen dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 kanaatiyle HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 353\/1-a-3 maddesi gere\u011fince davan\u0131n g\u00f6revli olmayan ticaret mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, daval\u0131 vekilinin istinaf isteminin kabul\u00fcne, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak, dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6revli \u0130stanbul A**** *** style=”font-weight:800″>FSHHM g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in, mahkemesine iadesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
H \u00dc K \u00dc M : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle:
1-Daval\u0131 vekilinin istinaf isteminin kabul\u00fc ile, \u0130stanbul A**** *** Ticaret Mahkemesinin 10.07.2018 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 2015\/157 Esas, 2018\/718 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 353\/1-a-3 maddesi gere\u011fince KALDIRILMASINA<\/strong>,
2-Dosyan\u0131n, g\u00f6revli \u0130stanbul A**** *** S\u0131nai Haklar Hukuk Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in, dosyan\u0131n ilk derece mahkemesine GER\u0130<\/strong> \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
3-\u0130stinaf talebi kabul edildi\u011finden, istinaf pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n talebi halinde daval\u0131 tarafa iadesine,
4-\u0130stinaf yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan 98,10 TL<\/strong> istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 31,50 TL<\/strong> posta gideri olmak \u00fczere toplam 129,60 TL<\/strong>‘nin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine,
5-\u0130stinaf incelemesi duru\u015fmas\u0131z yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
6-Artan gider avanslar\u0131n\u0131n karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde ve talep halinde taraflara iadesine,
Dair, dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu 20\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 353\/1-a-3 maddesi uyar\u0131nca oybirli\u011fiyle kesin olarak karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"