Esas No:2017\/1929<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi8. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2017\/1929Karar No:2019\/378K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130STANBULANADOLU 4. ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 06\/09\/2017<br>NUMARASI : 2017\/4203 E. – 2017\/4203 K.DAVANINKONUSU: Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n Tebli\u011fe \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \/ Saklanmas\u0131\u0130ST\u0130NAFKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 21\/02\/2019<br>Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda;GERE\u011e\u0130D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:Ba\u015fvuran vekili sigorta tahkim komisyonuna sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7esi ile; 09\/10\/2015 tarihinde meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131nda %8 oran\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10943"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10943"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10944,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10943\/revisions\/10944"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/378<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130STANBUL<\/strong>ANADOLU<\/strong> 4. ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 06\/09\/2017<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2017\/4203 E. – 2017\/4203 K.
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: Hakem Karar\u0131n\u0131n Tebli\u011fe \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 \/ Saklanmas\u0131
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 21\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda;
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc:Ba\u015fvuran vekili sigorta tahkim komisyonuna sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7esi ile; 09\/10\/2015 <\/strong>tarihinde meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131nda %8 oran\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kapsamda daha \u00f6nce 26.481,00-TL<\/strong> \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan bu \u00f6demenin yetersiz oldu\u011funu belirterek fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere 5.000,00-TL<\/strong> (\u0131slah ile 19.982,21-TL<\/strong>) s\u00fcrekli maluliyet tazminat\u0131n\u0131n yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131; davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyeti al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporu do\u011frultusunda 19.892,21-TL<\/strong> s\u00fcrekli maluliyet tazminat\u0131n\u0131n 17\/02\/2017 tarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti daval\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.Daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur.Daval\u0131 vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; bilirki\u015fi raporunun hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, 01\/06\/2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Zorunlu Mali Mesuliyet Genel \u015eartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re hesaplama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.\u0130stinaf edenin s\u0131fat\u0131 ve istinaf sebepleri ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan incelemede; 09\/10\/2015 <\/strong>tarihinde meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131nda %8 oran\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kapsamda daha \u00f6nce 26.481,00-TL<\/strong> \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede; dava trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 kal\u0131c\u0131 beden g\u00fcc\u00fc kayb\u0131 zarar\u0131n\u0131n tazminine ili\u015fkindir.
6456 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 45.maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5684 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 30\/12.maddesi gere\u011fince;Be\u015fbin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen hakem kararlar\u0131 kesindir.Be\u015fbin t\u00fcrk liras\u0131 ve daha \u00fczerindeki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen hakem kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 komisyonca ilgiliye bildirimden itibaren 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde bir defaya mahsus olmak \u00fczere komisyon nezdinde itiraz edilebilir. \u0130tiraz \u00fczerine Sigorta Tahkim \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetinin 40.000,00 T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7meyen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi kararlar ise kesindir.40.000,00-TL<\/strong>‘nin \u00fczerindeki kararlar i\u00e7in temyize gidilebilir h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir.Talebe konu tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n 19.892,21-TL<\/strong> oldu\u011fu, Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakemince kabul karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi,itiraz hakem heyetine yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi, karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinafa getirildi\u011fi, bu sebeple uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k miktar\u0131n\u0131n 19.892,21-TL<\/strong> oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve 5684 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 30\/12-son \u015fartlar\u0131 da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan karar kesin niteliktedir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kesin karara kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilince yap\u0131lan istinaf talebinin usulden reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM: Gerek\u00e7e uyar\u0131nca;
1-Sigorta Tahkim Komisyonu \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince verilen 31\/07\/2017 <\/strong>g\u00fcn ve 2017\/i.2311-2017\/\u0130HK<\/strong>-2812 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan verilen istinaf dilek\u00e7esinin ve isteminin 5684 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 30\/12 ve HMK<\/strong>.346\/1 ve 352.maddeleri gere\u011fince karar\u0131n kesin olmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2-Pe\u015fin olarak daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan 340,00-TL<\/strong> nispi karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi halinde kendisine \u0130ADES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
3-\u0130ncelemenin dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine YER<\/strong>OLMADI\u011eINA<\/strong>,
4-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan giderlerin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
HMK<\/strong>. m.352 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda ve HMK<\/strong>. m. 362\/1-a gere\u011fince, KES\u0130N<\/strong> olmak \u00fczere oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.21\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"