Esas No:2019\/309<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi16. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2019\/309Karar No:2019\/382K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130STANBULANADOLU 7.ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 16\/11\/2018<br>NUMARASI : 2018\/1200 EsasDAVANINKONUSU: Menfi Tespit (K\u0131ymetli Evrak \u0130ptali )KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130: 25\/02\/2019<br>\u0130STANBULANADOLU 7. ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130 taraf\u0131ndan verilen 16\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 … vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine dosya dairemize intikal etmekle, incelendi.G E R E \u011e \u0130 D \u00dc \u015e \u00dc N \u00dc L D \u00dc :Davac\u0131lar vekilinin 15.11.2018 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkili …’in in\u015faat malzemeleri…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10941"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10941"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10942,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10941\/revisions\/10942"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/382<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> : \u0130STANBUL<\/strong>ANADOLU<\/strong> 7.ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 16\/11\/2018<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2018\/1200 Esas
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong>: Menfi Tespit (K\u0131ymetli Evrak \u0130ptali )
KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 25\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>\u0130STANBUL<\/strong>ANADOLU<\/strong> 7. ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan verilen 16\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 … vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine dosya dairemize intikal etmekle, incelendi.
G E R E \u011e \u0130 D \u00dc \u015e \u00dc N \u00dc L D \u00dc :
Davac\u0131lar vekilinin 15.11.2018 <\/strong>tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkili …’in in\u015faat malzemeleri sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yapan m\u00fcvekkili …’n\u0131n ise, emlak gayrimenkul i\u015fi ile u\u011fra\u015fan arkada\u015flar oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkili …’ya silah zoruyla darp ve tehditle bor\u00e7lusu …, kefili … olan lehtar\u0131 ve vade tarihi bilinmeyen 350.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli bono imzalatt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015f oldu\u011funu, \u0130stanbul A**** *** style=”font-weight:800″>CBS 2018\/184743 soru\u015fturma numaral\u0131 savc\u0131l\u0131k dosyas\u0131 ile soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, davadan sonra \u0130stanbul A**** *** M\u00fcd. …E.say\u0131l\u0131 icra dosyas\u0131yla takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, dava dilek\u00e7esinde ise; davan\u0131n has\u0131ms\u0131z olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, senedin alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bilinmedi\u011fi beyan edilerek bononun iptalinin talep edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u0130stanbul A**** *** Ticaret Mahkemesinin 2018\/1200 E.say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda 16.11.2018 <\/strong>tarihli tensip karar\u0131 ile, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n, icra takibinin durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ihtiyati tedbir talep etmi\u015f ise de; davan\u0131n \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 72 maddeye g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lan menfi tespit davas\u0131 oldu\u011fu; bu t\u00fcr davada sadece imza inkar\u0131 halinde ihtiyati tedbire ili\u015fkin HMK<\/strong> h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 72 ‘nin ihtiyati tedbir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131; di\u011fer hallerde \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 72 maddenin ihtiyati tedbir i\u00e7in uygulanaca\u011f\u0131; gasp iddias\u0131nda da bu nedenle \u0130\u0130K<\/strong> 72 maddesi uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 ve buna g\u00f6re icra takibinden sonra ancak icra veznesine girecek paran\u0131n \u00f6dennmemesi i\u00e7in tedbir verilebilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle; ihtiyati tedbir talebinin ”icra veznesine girecek paran\u0131n daval\u0131lara \u00f6denmemesi ” i\u00e7in kabul\u00fcne, davac\u0131 taraf alaca\u011f\u0131n %15 ‘i olan 52.500,00 TL<\/strong> teminat verdi\u011finde yada teminat mektubu sundu\u011funda A**** *** \u0130cra dairesine m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak … say\u0131l\u0131 dosyalar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan tahsilatlar sonunda icra veznesine girecek paran\u0131n alacakl\u0131lara \u00f6denmesini ihtiyati tedbir yoluyla durduruldu\u011funun bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 … vekilinin 07.12.2018 <\/strong>tarihli istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkilinin kambiyo senedini iyiniyetle devralan 3.ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu, … taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkiline borcuna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak ciro ve teslim ile devredildi\u011fini, davac\u0131lar ve di\u011fer daval\u0131lar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi m\u00fcvekkilinin bilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kambiyo senetlerinin illetten m\u00fccerret oldu\u011funu beyanla, tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131lar vekili istinafa cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011funu, bononun cebir, silahla tehdit edilmek suretiyle imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, savc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n derdest oldu\u011funu, bedelsiz oldu\u011funu bildikleri halde icra takibine konu ettiklerinden dolay\u0131 soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla ve dava dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarla istinaf talebinin reddini istemi\u015ftir. Dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan \u0130stanbul A**** *** M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn … E.say\u0131l\u0131 icra dosyas\u0131 \u00f6deme emri ve ekinde bulunan senet fotokopisinden 05.10.2018 <\/strong>vade, 29.09.2018 <\/strong>ke\u015fide tarihli 350.000 TL<\/strong> bedelli bono’da …’in bor\u00e7lu …’n\u0131n kefil oldu\u011fu, alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n … olup, …’e ciro edildi\u011fi, bedelin nakden al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, 18\/10\/2018 <\/strong>tarihinde kambiyo senetlerine m\u00fcstenit takip ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
GEREK\u00c7E<\/strong>:
Dairemiz \u00f6n\u00fcne getirilen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; \u0130stanbul A**** *** Ticaret Mahkemesi’nin 16\/11\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131d\u0131r.
Tedbir karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 … vekilinin 07\/12\/2018 <\/strong>tarihli B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine hitaben yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK<\/strong> 394\/2 maddesinde ihtiyati tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131 taraf haz\u0131r bulunuyorsa, tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131ndan itibaren; haz\u0131r bulunmuyorsa, tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 1 hafta i\u00e7inde, ihtiyati tedbirin \u015fartlar\u0131na, mahkemenin yetkisine ve teminata ili\u015fkin olarak, karar\u0131 veren mahkemeye itiraz edebilir. h\u00fckm\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmekle, tedbir karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131n ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, HMK<\/strong> 341\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince ihtiyati tedbir talebinin kabul\u00fc halinde itiraz \u00fczerine verilecek kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu, tedbirin kabul\u00fc kararlar\u0131n\u0131n itiraza tabi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, istinaf talebinin usulden reddine, itiraz\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine geri \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
H \u00dc K \u00dc M : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7e ile:
6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK<\/strong>.’n\u0131n 341\/1 ve 352. maddeleri gere\u011fince daval\u0131 … vekilinin istinaf isteminin USULDEN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
Dosyan\u0131n itiraz hakk\u0131nda karar verilmek \u00fczere ilk derece mahkemesine GER\u0130<\/strong> \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
Daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yat\u0131r\u0131lan 31,40 TL<\/strong> harc\u0131n istinaf incelemesi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131ya iadesine
\u0130stinaf incelemesi duru\u015fmas\u0131z yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
\u0130stinaf yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin daval\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
Artan gider avanslar\u0131n\u0131n karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde ve talep halinde taraflara iadesine,
Dair, dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucu 25\/02\/2019 <\/strong>tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile kesin olarak karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"