Esas No:2017\/1645<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi8. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2017\/1645Karar No:2019\/383K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: KOCAEL\u0130 1. ASL\u0130YET\u0130CARETMAHKEMES\u0130TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 20\/03\/2017<br>NUMARASI : 2016\/871E,- 2017\/177K.DAVAT\u00dcR\u00dc: Ticari \u0130li\u015fkiden Kaynaklanan Tespit\u0130ST\u0130NAFKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 28\/02\/2019<br>Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;GERE\u011e\u0130D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: Davac\u0131 vasisi dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; vasisi bulundu\u011fu …’a ait arac\u0131n daval\u0131 … \u015firketi nezdinde kasko sigortal\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayan\u0131larak daha \u00f6nce davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10939"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10939"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10939\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10940,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10939\/revisions\/10940"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/383<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: KOCAEL\u0130<\/strong> 1. ASL\u0130YE<\/strong>T\u0130CARET<\/strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 20\/03\/2017<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2016\/871E,- 2017\/177K.
DAVA<\/strong>T\u00dcR<\/strong>\u00dc: Ticari \u0130li\u015fkiden Kaynaklanan Tespit
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 28\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc: Davac\u0131 vasisi dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; vasisi bulundu\u011fu …’a ait arac\u0131n daval\u0131 … \u015firketi nezdinde kasko sigortal\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayan\u0131larak daha \u00f6nce davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar sonucunda, haks\u0131z ve hukuksuz olarak verilen red kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle, yarg\u0131lama giderleri ile y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutulan k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 aleyhine daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin icra takiplerine ge\u00e7ti\u011finin, kararlar\u0131n haks\u0131z ve hukuksuz oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin de bildi\u011fini, bu nedenle s\u00f6z konusu takipler ve davalar nedeniyle …’\u0131n daval\u0131 … \u015firketine herhangi bir borcu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine karar verilmesini istemi\u015f ve yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda da G\u00f6lc\u00fck Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde al\u0131nan 14\/07\/2012 <\/strong>g\u00fcn 2010\/281 esas-2012\/354 say\u0131l\u0131 husumete izin karar\u0131n\u0131 ibraz etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 … \u015firket ivekili cevab\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; davan\u0131n ne oldu\u011funun ve ni\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6revli mahkemenin de asliye ticaret mahkemesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davaya asliye hukuk mahkemesinde bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.Mahkemece; davac\u0131n\u0131n daha \u00f6nce g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp karara ba\u011flanan mahkeme ilamlar\u0131n\u0131 dava konusu ederek bu ilamlar sebebiyle bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini talep etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, oysa davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu ilamlar ile h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6demelerin hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 menfi tespit davas\u0131 ile de\u011fil, temyiz ya da istinaf yasa yoluna m\u00fcracaat ile ileri s\u00fcrmesi gerekti\u011fi, dava dilek\u00e7esindeki anlat\u0131mlar ve yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan beyanlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonras\u0131 verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu,b\u00f6yle bir davan\u0131n HMK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 114\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle reddi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnden hareketle, a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.Karara kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vasisi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur.\u0130stinaf nedenleri; iddialar\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kendilerine imkan tan\u0131nmadan, tan\u0131k dinlenilmeden ve daval\u0131 sigortac\u0131n\u0131n ara\u00e7ta meydana gelen ger\u00e7ek zarar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek daha \u00f6nce verilen red kararlar\u0131 ile bu davalarla ilgili olarak al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 irdelenmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesinin hak ihlali oldu\u011fu hususuna ili\u015fkindir.\u0130stinaf edenin s\u0131fat\u0131na, istinaf\u0131n kapsam ve nedenlerine g\u00f6re dava, trafik kazas\u0131 sonucunda davac\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131nda meydana gelen hasar nedeniyle olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n sigortac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla daha \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n haks\u0131z ve hukuksuz olarak aleyhlerine sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa ra\u011fmen, k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 aleyhine icra takiplerine ge\u00e7ildi\u011fi, oysa icra takiplerinin konusunu olu\u015fturan ilamlar\u0131n haks\u0131z ve hukuksuz olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n kendilerinden b\u00f6yle bir istemde bulunamayacaklar\u0131 nedeniyle, daval\u0131 tarafa herhangi bir bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan, k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131 …’a ait olan ve 29\/09\/2003-<\/strong>29\/09\/2004 <\/strong>tarihleri kapsayan bi\u00e7imde daval\u0131 … \u015firketi nezdinde kasko sigortal\u0131 bulunan … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131n; … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 di\u011fer bir ara\u00e7la \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sonucunda, 15\/01\/2004 <\/strong>tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen trafik kazas\u0131nda hasarland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a farkl\u0131 zaman ve farkl\u0131 mahkemelerde bu kaza nedeniyle olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi i\u00e7in daval\u0131 … \u015firketi aleyhine \u00e7e\u015fitli davalar a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131lan t\u00fcm bu davalar\u0131n redle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131 … \u015firketinin de redle sonu\u00e7lanan ilamlara dayan\u0131larak icra takipleri ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.Davac\u0131 taraf, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine dayanak k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilamlar\u0131n haks\u0131z ve hukuksuz oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle de icra takibine ge\u00e7ilmesinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuksuzluk nedeniyle, daval\u0131ya herhangi bir borcunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine karar verilmesini istemektedir. Davac\u0131 vasisisinin mahkemeye sundu\u011fu 10\/08\/2016 <\/strong>hakim havale g\u00fcnl\u00fc dilek\u00e7e ekindeki mahkeme ilamlar\u0131 ve icra emirleri g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, tamam\u0131n\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce verilen kararlar oldu\u011fu ve bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n da Yarg\u0131tay denetiminden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha \u00f6nce taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan davalar nedeniyle verilen kararlar\u0131n do\u011fru ve isabetli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, herhangi bir hak ihlali bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemek T**** *** Anayasas\u0131 ve yasalar\u0131na g\u00f6re, belli prosed\u00fcrlere ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Verilen bir karar\u0131n do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak; temyiz, istinaf, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesi, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenen kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvuru sonucunda belirlenebilir. Bir mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 nitelikte ba\u015fka bir mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmesi, di\u011fer bir ifadeyle \u00f6nceki mahkemede belirlenen durum ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, hak ihlali iddias\u0131n\u0131n ise, ancak Anayasa Mahkemesinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, istinaf ba\u015fvurusuna konu mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7esinde ve takdirinde herhangi bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 vasisinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK<\/strong>.m.353\/1-b\/1 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong>: Gerek\u00e7e uyar\u0131nca;
1-Us\u00c3\u00bbl ve yasaya uygun olan ve ba\u015fl\u0131kta yaz\u0131l\u0131 bulunan ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vasisi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK<\/strong>.m. 353\/1-b\/1 h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince ESASTAN<\/strong>REDD\u0130NE<\/strong>,
2- Karar tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Har\u00e7lar Kanunu uyar\u0131nca, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran davac\u0131dan al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 44,40-TL<\/strong> maktu istinaf karar ve ilam harc\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulurken pe\u015fin olarak yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan 31,40-TL<\/strong>‘nin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc ile kalan 13,00-TL<\/strong> istinaf karar ve ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak Hazine’ye gelir kaydedilmesine,
3-\u0130ncelemenin duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle taraflar yarar\u0131na avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine YER<\/strong>OLMADI\u011eINA<\/strong>,
4-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan giderlerin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
Dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ve HMK<\/strong>.m.361\/1 h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince, karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 2 hafta i\u00e7erisinde Yarg\u0131tay’a temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunma yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.28\/02\/2019.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"