Esas No:2017\/1673<\/strong> \u0130NCELENEN<\/strong>KARARIN<\/strong> T.C.\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi8. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2017\/1673Karar No:2019\/384K. Tarihi: \u0130NCELENENKARARINMAHKEMES\u0130: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret MahkemesiTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 16\/05\/2017<br>NUMARASI : 2014\/1807 E.- 2017\/503 K.DAVANINKONUSU : \u00d6l\u00fcm ve Cismani Zarar Sebebiyle A\u00e7\u0131lan Tazminat.\u0130ST\u0130NAFKARARTAR\u0130H\u0130: 28\/02\/2019<br>Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;GERE\u011e\u0130D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi nezdinde zorunlu trafik sigortal\u0131 bulunan ……<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[66],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10937"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10937"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10937\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10938,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10937\/revisions\/10938"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2019\/384<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>: \u0130stanbul A**** *** Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi
TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong> : 16\/05\/2017<<\/strong>br>NUMARASI<\/strong> : 2014\/1807 E.- 2017\/503 K.
DAVANIN<\/strong>KONUSU<\/strong> : \u00d6l\u00fcm ve Cismani Zarar Sebebiyle A\u00e7\u0131lan Tazminat.
\u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/strong>KARAR<\/strong>TAR\u0130H\u0130<\/strong>: 28\/02\/2019<<\/strong>br>Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda;
GERE\u011e\u0130<\/strong>D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD<\/strong>\u00dc:Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi nezdinde zorunlu trafik sigortal\u0131 bulunan … plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131n kusurlu bir \u015fekilde vekil edeninin s\u00fcr\u00fcs\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu …plaka say\u0131l\u0131 motosiklete \u00e7arpmas\u0131 sonucunda 14\/09\/2014 <\/strong>tarihinde meydana gelen trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, fazlaya ili\u015fen haklar sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla 5.000,00-TL<\/strong> tazminat\u0131n temerr\u00fct tarihinden i\u015fletilecek avans faizi ile birlikte, daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketinden tahsiline karar verilmesini istemi\u015f, 25\/11\/2016 <\/strong>g\u00fcnl\u00fc \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile de istek miktar\u0131n\u0131 70.133,84-TL<\/strong>‘ye \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi vekili cevab\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde kan\u0131tlamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n kaza an\u0131nda kask kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi halinde de m\u00fcterafik kusur indirimi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istediklerini belirterek davaya kar\u015f\u0131 koymu\u015ftur.Mahkemece, iddia, savunma, toplanan deliller, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek; davan\u0131n konusunu olu\u015fturan trafik kazas\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumunda sigortal\u0131 ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn %75, davac\u0131n\u0131n ise %25 oran\u0131nda kusurlu olduklar\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n kaza sonucunda yaralanarak %11 oran\u0131nda kal\u0131c\u0131 i\u015f g\u00f6remezli\u011fe u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik s\u00fcresinin 9 ay oldu\u011fu, buna g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik d\u00f6nem zarar\u0131n\u0131n 427,73-TL<\/strong>, kal\u0131c\u0131 i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik zarar\u0131n\u0131n ise 69.706,11-TL<\/strong> bulundu\u011fu, daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketine dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmamas\u0131 nedeniyle temerr\u00fct halinin davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131yla ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 ve arac\u0131n hususi ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde de avans faizi de\u011fil yasal faiz istenebilece\u011fi benimsenmek suretiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile toplam 70.133,80-TL<\/strong> maddi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihinden i\u015fletilecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline, fazlaya ili\u015fen iste\u011fin ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.Karara kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur.\u0130stinaf nedeni; kaza an\u0131nda kask takmayan davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcterafik kusurlu say\u0131larak TBK<\/strong>‘n\u0131n 52.madde uyar\u0131nca belirlenen tazminattan indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenildi\u011fi halde, bu konuda herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu hususuna y\u00f6neliktir.\u0130stinaf edenin s\u0131fat\u0131na, istinaf\u0131n kapsam ve nedenleriyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmak kayd\u0131yla yap\u0131lan inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda;Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan beden g\u00fcc\u00fc kayb\u0131 zarar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.Daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan verilen cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, m\u00fcterafik kusur iddias\u0131nda bulunularak, davac\u0131n\u0131n kaza an\u0131nda kask tak\u0131p takmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi istenilmi\u015ftir.Zarar\u0131n meydana gelmesinde veya artmas\u0131nda ma\u011fdurun da kusurunun bulunmas\u0131 halinde di\u011fer bir ifadeyle zarara u\u011frayan, zarar do\u011furan eyleme raz\u0131 olmu\u015f veya kendisinin sebep oldu\u011fu hal ve \u015fartlar zarar meydana gelmesine etki yapm\u0131\u015f veya zarar sorumlusunun durumunun a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ise kaza tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu 52. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hakim tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131 hafifletebilir.Ne var ki mahkemece; daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n m\u00fcterafik kusurla ilgili talebi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olumlu veya olumsuz herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7im ve \u015fekilde davan\u0131n kabulune karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu durum, HMK<\/strong>.m.353\/1-a\/6 h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131ndaki hali olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi vekilinin istinaf itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n m\u00fcterafik kusur talebinin de\u011ferlendirilerek yeniden bir karar verilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/strong>: Gerek\u00e7e uyar\u0131nca;
1-Daval\u0131 … A.\u015e vekili taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle KABUL<\/strong>\u00dc ile, istinaf istemine konu olan ve ba\u015fl\u0131kta yaz\u0131l\u0131 bulunan ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n HMK<\/strong>.m.353\/1-a\/6 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca KALDIRILMASINA<\/strong>,
2-Dosyan\u0131n, yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen bi\u00e7imde inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere mahkemesine G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
3-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan pe\u015fin olarak yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan 31.40’ar TL<\/strong> maktu, 1.166,31 TL<\/strong> nispi istinaf karar ve ilam harc\u0131 ile 85,70’\u015fer TL<\/strong> istinaf ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131n\u0131n talep halinde daval\u0131ya \u0130ADES\u0130NE<\/strong>,
4-Dosya \u00fczerinde inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti takdirine YER<\/strong>OLMADI\u011eINA<\/strong>,
5-\u0130stinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuran daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan di\u011fer giderlerin ilk derece mahkemesince verilecek nihai kararda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131na,
HMK<\/strong>. m.353\/1-a\/6 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca, dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ve KES\u0130N<\/strong> olmak \u00fczere, oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.28\/02\/2019.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"