Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin yat\u0131r\u0131m amac\u0131yla i\u015flem yapmak \u00fczere daval\u0131 \u015firkete ba\u015fvuruda bulunarak, m\u00fcvekkil ile daval\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda t\u00fcketici ve hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, buna g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131m i\u015flemlerine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 \u015firketin hesaplar\u0131na havaleler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131lan havale tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n borsa i\u015flemleri i\u00e7in daval\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan talep olunmu\u015fsa da yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme esaslar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, taraflar aras\u0131nda akdedilen s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshine, 58.000,00 TL zarar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tazminine karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 \u015firket vekili, davan\u0131n g\u00f6revsiz mahkemede a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n nihai t\u00fcketim amac\u0131yla de\u011fil, kar elde etmek amac\u0131yla kald\u0131ra\u00e7l\u0131 al\u0131m-sat\u0131m i\u015flemleri ile t\u00fcrev ara\u00e7lar\u0131 al\u0131m-sat\u0131m\u0131 yapabilmek i\u00e7in mevzuat\u0131na g\u00f6re kurulan \u201cArac\u0131 Kurum\u201d stat\u00fcs\u00fcndeki m\u00fcvekkili \u015firketle \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda t\u00fcketici olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ticari ama\u00e7la hareket eden ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi konumunda oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin bir finans kurumu oldu\u011funu, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta g\u00f6revli mahkemenin ticaret mahkemeleri oldu\u011funu savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki i\u015flemin t\u00fcketici i\u015flemi olmay\u0131p, yat\u0131r\u0131m ama\u00e7l\u0131 ticari i\u015f oldu\u011fu, bu haliyle 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi, Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ve h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re genel mahkemelerde inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle, g\u00f6revsizli\u011fi ile dava dilek\u00e7esinin g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, talep halinde dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6revli \u0130stanbul N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un Di\u011fer T\u00fcketici S\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan 49.maddesi, \u201cFinansal hizmetlere dair mesafeli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bu maddenin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re finansal hizmetler, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc banka hizmeti, kredi, sigorta, bireysel emeklilik, yat\u0131r\u0131m ve \u00f6deme ile ilgili hizmetleri ifade eder. Finansal hizmetlere dair mesafeli s\u00f6zle\u015fme ise, finansal hizmetlerin uzaktan pazarlanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bir sistem \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 ile t\u00fcketici aras\u0131nda uzaktan ileti\u015fim ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle kurulan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerdir. Yine ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 73\/1. maddesi, \u201cT\u00fcketici i\u015flemleri ile t\u00fcketiciye y\u00f6nelik uygulamalardan do\u011fabilecek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara dair davalarda t\u00fcketici mahkemeleri g\u00f6revlidir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc, 83. maddesi ise, \u201cBu Kanunda h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulan\u0131r. Taraflardan birini t\u00fcketicinin olu\u015fturdu\u011fu i\u015flemler ile ilgili, di\u011fer kanunlarda d\u00fczenleme olmas\u0131, bu i\u015flemin t\u00fcketici i\u015flemi say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu Kanunun g\u00f6rev ve yetkiye dair h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemez.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc amirdir. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu h\u00fck\u00fcmler birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin, t\u00fcketici i\u015flemi kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu ili\u015fkiden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda T\u00fcketici Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle, mahkemece davaya bakmakla g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcyle i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilip, gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi – Karar: 2016\/69879.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Finansal Hizmet Sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 ile Yap\u0131lan S\u00f6zle\u015fmede G\u00f6revli Mahkeme Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin yat\u0131r\u0131m amac\u0131yla i\u015flem yapmak \u00fczere daval\u0131 \u015firkete ba\u015fvuruda bulunarak, m\u00fcvekkil ile daval\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda t\u00fcketici ve hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011funu, buna g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131m i\u015flemlerine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 \u015firketin hesaplar\u0131na havaleler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131lan havale tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n borsa i\u015flemleri i\u00e7in daval\u0131 \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan talep olunmu\u015fsa da…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[65],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10899"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10899"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10900,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10899\/revisions\/10900"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}