Ger\u00e7ekten de; TBK\u2019ya g\u00f6re daha \u00f6zel bir Kanun konumunda olan Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda, kamu hizmeti g\u00f6ren avukatlar\u0131n hak ve sorumluluklar\u0131na ve avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelere yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ancak, bu y\u00f6ndeki bir belirleme, \u00f6zel hukuk h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re avukat \u2013 m\u00fcvekkil aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin, TBK 502 ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden ayr\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme t\u00fcr\u00fc oldu\u011fu sonucunu do\u011furmayacakt\u0131r. Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki 6502 say\u0131l\u0131 TKHK\u2019da T\u00fcketici i\u015flemi, mal veya hizmet piyasalar\u0131nda kamu t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri de d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere ticari veya mesleki ama\u00e7larla hareket eden \u2026 ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczel ki\u015filer ile t\u00fcketiciler aras\u0131nda kurulan, eser, \u2026 vek\u00e2let, \u2026 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve hukuki i\u015flemi, \u2026 ifade eder. \u201c \u015feklinde tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, art\u0131k Kanunun bu tan\u0131m\u0131ndan hareketle, avukat \u2013 m\u00fcvekkil aras\u0131ndaki vekalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakl\u0131 ili\u015fkinin niteli\u011finin buna g\u00f6re belirlenmesi gerekece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, Vekil-M\u00fcvekkil aras\u0131nda vekalete dayal\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesel bir ili\u015fki kuruldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, s\u00f6zle\u015fmesel ili\u015fkinin temelindeki i\u015flemin, t\u00fcketici i\u015flemi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re mahkemelerin g\u00f6revli olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daireler aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n giderilmesine karar verilmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SONU\u00c7: Avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden kaynaklanan ihtilaflarda mahkemelerin g\u00f6revi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, Daireler aras\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve uygulama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekilde temeldeki i\u015flemin t\u00fcketici i\u015fleminden kaynaklanmas\u0131 durumunda t\u00fcketici mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funa, ayn\u0131 yer ve farkl\u0131 yer B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemeleri daireleri aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve uygulama ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu \u015fekilde giderilmesine oybirli\u011fi ile kesin olarak 12\/07\/2018 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde karar verildi (Yarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi- Esas No: 2018\/3545 E., Karar No: 2018\/7887).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131, avukat oldu\u011funu, \u0130stanbul 5. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2012\/438 E. 2013\/427 K. say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6n al\u0131m hakk\u0131ndan kaynaklan tapu iptal tescil istekli bu davan\u0131n kabulle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kapsamda 42.500 TL avukatl\u0131k \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, bunun tahsili i\u00e7in ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 takibe daval\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z itirazda bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, itiraz\u0131n iptaline, takibin devam\u0131na ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 73. maddesi bu kanunun uygulanmas\u0131 ile ilgili her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ihtilafa t\u00fcketici mahkemelerinde bak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bir hukuki i\u015flemin sadece 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 yasada d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na o i\u015flemden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcketici mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesini gerektirmez. Bir hukuki i\u015flemin 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in taraflardan birinin t\u00fcketici olmas\u0131 gerekir. Somut olayda davac\u0131 avukat vekalet \u00fccretinin tahsili istemiyle eldeki davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re davaya bakmaya T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir. G\u00f6revle ilgili d\u00fczenlemeler kamu d\u00fczenine dair olup taraflar ileri s\u00fcrmese dahi yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda resen g\u00f6zetilir. G\u00f6revle ilgili hususlarda kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak s\u00f6z konusu olmaz. Bu durumda mahkemece, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcketici mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131 ile g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekirken genel mahkeme s\u0131fat\u0131 ile g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Bozmay\u0131 gerektirir. (Yarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi – Karar: 2017\/151).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Avukatl\u0131k Vekalet S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Do\u011fan Davalarda T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi G\u00f6revlidir Ger\u00e7ekten de; TBK\u2019ya g\u00f6re daha \u00f6zel bir Kanun konumunda olan Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda, kamu hizmeti g\u00f6ren avukatlar\u0131n hak ve sorumluluklar\u0131na ve avukatl\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelere yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ancak, bu y\u00f6ndeki bir belirleme, \u00f6zel hukuk h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re avukat \u2013 m\u00fcvekkil aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerin, TBK 502 ve…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[65],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10859"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10859"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10860,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10859\/revisions\/10860"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}